Hosted by Darren Baker
Did all Shermans have the side mount strip?
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 03, 2007 - 08:48 AM UTC
Some of the Sherman tank pictures I've seen show no sign of having the mounting strips for the side fenders going over the track tops. In which case, which Shermans had the side strips, and which didn't? It seems these fenders were rarely used in the field anway.
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 03, 2007 - 09:30 AM UTC
Off the top of my head, some "earlish" Shermans had the sand shield mounts under the sponson. Later, the more commonly seen bolt holed strip was used. I don't know but I think the earliest Shermans didn't have either... again this is just off the top of my head.
Roy Chow
AMPS 1st Vice President
2008 International Show Chairman
April 10-12, 2008. Auburn, IN
www.amps-armor.org
Roy Chow
AMPS 1st Vice President
2008 International Show Chairman
April 10-12, 2008. Auburn, IN
www.amps-armor.org
HONEYCUT
Victoria, Australia
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 03, 2007 - 01:33 PM UTC
Gday Tom. As Roy stated and from the pics I've seen it seems some earlier M4s and M4A1s especially from the Italian campaign showed no signs of the sandshield attachment strips.
Quoted Text
It seems these fenders were rarely used in the field anway.
Yeah, I think it actually became doctrine later as they interfered with running gear maintenance...
Hope it helps some! What are you building?
Cheers
Brad
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 03, 2007 - 10:21 PM UTC
I'm building an IDF M50, the 1956 version, using Tamiya's M4 as the base. The M4 kit has the unrealistic ridges along the sides, and I'd be happy to just remove the things and leave the sides bare.
INDIA11A
Ontario, Canada
Joined: January 09, 2005
KitMaker: 577 posts
Armorama: 446 posts
Joined: January 09, 2005
KitMaker: 577 posts
Armorama: 446 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 03, 2007 - 10:55 PM UTC
Add them for the M50. Shermans converted had gone through a few re-builds by '56. For some reason the sand shields where added only to be removed by the troops in the field .
Doug
Doug
Gill-oh-no
Paris, France
Joined: October 09, 2005
KitMaker: 44 posts
Armorama: 43 posts
Joined: October 09, 2005
KitMaker: 44 posts
Armorama: 43 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 03, 2007 - 11:51 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Off the top of my head, some "earlish" Shermans had the sand shield mounts under the sponson. Later, the more commonly seen bolt holed strip was used. I don't know but I think the earliest Shermans didn't have either... again this is just off the top of my head.
I recall the same thing from an old thread on Missing Lynx.
HTH