_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: British Armor
Discuss all types of British Armor of all eras.
Hosted by Darren Baker
British N.E. markings
Andronicus
Visit this Community
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: March 13, 2007
KitMaker: 391 posts
Armorama: 321 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 06, 2007 - 02:02 PM UTC
My military history isn't that great but I noticed that UK/Cmmwlth forces for D Day /Italy onwards appeared to adopt the American white star (sans circle) for their vehicles.

Was this for political reasons? Or was it simply to make identification easier for US forces and help prevent 'friendly fire'?


Andronicus
ukgeoff
Visit this Community
England - North East, United Kingdom
Joined: May 03, 2002
KitMaker: 1,007 posts
Armorama: 703 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 06, 2007 - 03:22 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Or was it simply to make identification easier for US forces and help prevent 'friendly fire'?



Exactly
NWBrit
Visit this Community
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: October 30, 2003
KitMaker: 46 posts
Armorama: 41 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 06, 2007 - 04:03 PM UTC
Andronicus,

According to Hodges book on British Military Markings the white star was adopted as an air recognition sign on all allied vehicles in North West Europe. The ones on the side of vehicles were without a circle, the upward facing ones were 'officially' supposed to be within a white circle.

All the best.

Chris
Andronicus
Visit this Community
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: March 13, 2007
KitMaker: 391 posts
Armorama: 321 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 06, 2007 - 04:29 PM UTC

Thanks for that chaps. Now you mention it I think my unmade Cromwell kit has a star in circle for the roof of the turret...

So essentially--the other allies had to change thier markings to stop the US shooting at them.

I've read about mistaken air-attacks but were there many instances of friendly fire between AVFs?


A
Halfyank
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Joined: February 01, 2003
KitMaker: 5,221 posts
Armorama: 1,245 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 06, 2007 - 07:07 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Thanks for that chaps. Now you mention it I think my unmade Cromwell kit has a star in circle for the roof of the turret...

So essentially--the other allies had to change their markings to stop the US shooting at them.

I've read about mistaken air-attacks but were there many instances of friendly fire between AVFs?


A



It wasn't just to have the US stop shooting at them. It was felt that it would be best for all the allied equipment to have similar markings and that the white star worked best.

As far as friendly fire between AFVs it did happen more often than anybody wanted. Certain vehicles would be more prone to this than others. For example the US M-18 Hellcat tank destroyer, because of it's suspension, looked more German than other allied equipment so it often had even larger white stars on it. On Shermans the white stars on the sides and front were often painted out, because the crews felt the Germans were aiming at the stars. The ones on the top though were kept as they would help stop air attacks.
Andronicus
Visit this Community
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: March 13, 2007
KitMaker: 391 posts
Armorama: 321 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 06, 2007 - 07:58 PM UTC
Weren't Panthers disguised as Hellcats in the Ardennes offensive?

I guess the similarity was recognised on both sides if so....


A
NormSon
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: December 17, 2006
KitMaker: 181 posts
Armorama: 141 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 06, 2007 - 08:32 PM UTC
In the Ardennes offensive, the Panthers were supposed to look like M-10's, as there were very few M-18's in service and the Germans weren't that familiar with them yet.

The circles were actually added to the stars so they looked less like the crosses on German vehicles from a distance. This is also why, in Africa and the Med theatre, the stars were painted yellow or a yellow circle painted around the white stars (there were lots of variations on this).
 _GOTOTOP