Hi All,
Did the British use the M10 or the M10A1 in NW Europe?
I've googled for an answer but the results haven't been too specific.
TIA
Tom
Hosted by Darren Baker
Wolverine tank destroyer
allycat
England - North East, United Kingdom
Joined: October 03, 2004
KitMaker: 942 posts
Armorama: 571 posts
Joined: October 03, 2004
KitMaker: 942 posts
Armorama: 571 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 - 11:23 PM UTC
wbill76
Texas, United States
Joined: May 02, 2006
KitMaker: 5,425 posts
Armorama: 4,659 posts
Joined: May 02, 2006
KitMaker: 5,425 posts
Armorama: 4,659 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 - 11:39 PM UTC
I believe so but they referred to it as the Achilles. Try looking for it under that designation and you might have more luck.
mark197205
England - East Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: November 10, 2003
KitMaker: 1,593 posts
Armorama: 1,465 posts
Joined: November 10, 2003
KitMaker: 1,593 posts
Armorama: 1,465 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 - 11:52 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I believe so but they referred to it as the Achilles. Try looking for it under that designation and you might have more luck.
Hi both, I'm no expert on British Armour, but wasnt the Achilles the 17 pounder armed version of the M-10?
allycat
England - North East, United Kingdom
Joined: October 03, 2004
KitMaker: 942 posts
Armorama: 571 posts
Joined: October 03, 2004
KitMaker: 942 posts
Armorama: 571 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 - 12:11 AM UTC
Your right, Mark.
The Achilles was the 17pdr version.
I'm wondering about the 3inch gunned version.
Tom
The Achilles was the 17pdr version.
I'm wondering about the 3inch gunned version.
Tom
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 - 12:16 AM UTC
Yes the M10 3" gun motor carriage was used by UK units in NWE
m4sherman
Arizona, United States
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 - 12:25 AM UTC
Yes the British Commonwealth used the M10 from 1943 on.
The M10A1's were the gas V8 versions and records indicate these did not see combat as 3 inch TD's. Some were converted to artillery tractors and used by the US Army. Most of the M10A1's were coverted to M36's.
The M10A1's were the gas V8 versions and records indicate these did not see combat as 3 inch TD's. Some were converted to artillery tractors and used by the US Army. Most of the M10A1's were coverted to M36's.
jjumbo
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 - 12:28 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Yes the M10 3" gun motor carriage was used by UK units in NWE
The M10 3" GMC's were also used by Polish, Canadian and other Commonwealth units.
Cheers
jjumbo
p.s. Randall, you beat me to the punch! LOL
allycat
England - North East, United Kingdom
Joined: October 03, 2004
KitMaker: 942 posts
Armorama: 571 posts
Joined: October 03, 2004
KitMaker: 942 posts
Armorama: 571 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 - 12:30 AM UTC
Thanks All,
Randall, would the Academy kit#1393 be the best match for a British M10?
Tom
Randall, would the Academy kit#1393 be the best match for a British M10?
Tom
Posted: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 - 03:02 AM UTC
Just for the record, the term Wolverine or Achillies doesn't appear to have been used in WW II at all. All available Commonwealth records list the M10s as 3" SP, M10 and the rearmed versionas 17 pdr SP, M10. There are post war drawings showing the 17 pdr versions as Achillies, but nothing from the war itself. The term Wolverine is a bit of a mystery and the best story I've heard to date is that it grew out of Cdn nomenclature (which was generally based upon animals), but even that doesn't appear on any documentation from the war.
Paul
Paul
Drader
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 - 02:11 PM UTC
This one in the IWM collection was photographed on the 6th June
No unit ID so it may equally be British or Canadian, looks like it has the right combination of late turret and add-on armour mounts to match the Academy model. And we shan't mention the various issues with the Academy model either......
The IWM collection has a couple more pictures, but they seem to be later versions without the add-on armour mounts. Removing them is fun to do on the Academy hull
David
No unit ID so it may equally be British or Canadian, looks like it has the right combination of late turret and add-on armour mounts to match the Academy model. And we shan't mention the various issues with the Academy model either......
The IWM collection has a couple more pictures, but they seem to be later versions without the add-on armour mounts. Removing them is fun to do on the Academy hull
David
210cav
Virginia, United States
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 6,149 posts
Armorama: 4,573 posts
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 6,149 posts
Armorama: 4,573 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 - 06:56 PM UTC
I thought the M-10 was the Wolverine and it was armed with the 3 inch gun which I seem to recall is really a naval gun used by the Army. The other vehicle names were: M-18 Hellcat and M-36 Jackson. I was also under the impression that the British/Commonwealth countries only re named the modified M-10 giving it the title Achilles. Am I off base here?
thanks
DJ
thanks
DJ
Posted: Thursday, May 24, 2007 - 12:28 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Am I off base here?
Yes, I'm afraid you are. :-)
The US never officially named the M10 and the Commonwealth called them 3" SP M10s throughout the war. The M18 was the Hellcat and the M36 was the Jackson, but the M10 stayed the M10.
The 3" gun was, indeed, originally a naval weapon adapted to the army as having a better punch than the 75mm M2 or M3.
Paul
NebLWeffah
Alberta, Canada
Joined: October 13, 2004
KitMaker: 1,683 posts
Armorama: 1,248 posts
Joined: October 13, 2004
KitMaker: 1,683 posts
Armorama: 1,248 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 24, 2007 - 12:56 AM UTC
Google abounds with 'M10' and 'Wolverine' used in combination. Prime Portal even has an M10 Wolverine walkaround. Now I'm confused but I admit I don't know much about this vehicle so that explains much right there.... I'm an M10 noob......
Bob
Bob
m4sherman
Arizona, United States
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 24, 2007 - 06:16 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Thanks All,
Randall, would the Academy kit#1393 be the best match for a British M10?
Tom
Tom,
I am not familiar with all the numbers that Acadamy used. The best bet is to check out the IWM pictures and find one that you like. The picture David posted is typical of Commonwealth M10's as I recall.
Most of the US veterans that I have talked to called M4's "M4's", M5's "M5's". All the names were made up by the British and very few US soldiers used these names. I figured that since the British named all the other tanks, they came up with the Wolverine name as well. Now I am curious as to where it came from.
Posted: Friday, May 25, 2007 - 12:53 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Google abounds with 'M10' and 'Wolverine' used in combination. Prime Portal even has an M10 Wolverine walkaround.
Yes, I realise that it's a common name for the M10, but apparently it is a post war fabrication with even less pedigree than "Achillies". At least Achillies shows up on post war documents. Who knows, maybe by the time of Korea the remaining 17 pdr M10s of the Strathcona's might have been named Wolverine by the Canadian Army. But I have yet to see or hear of anything definitive on where the term Wolverine came from.