True, but they all have to conform to the the laws of physics and structural integrity. Given what Miniart are representing within the details depicted in this model it just wouldn't work. Alan

Well, IMO it doesn't look too outlandish. No more so than this; All I'm saying is that there are all sort of building codes and I don't believe the way they've done this kit is too odd to be believable. If the main thing you're concerned about is that there should be support plates that could be easily fixed w/some styrene, either on the inside or outside. No biggie. I just thought it was nice looking piece. Cheers. Randy Pepprock Dioramas Plus True, but they all have to conform to the the laws of physics and structural integrity. Given what Miniart are representing within the details depicted in this model it just wouldn't work. Alan[/quote]

I like it and will buy it. I would like to do mine without the damage and that can be easily fixed with some plaster or Hydrocal. As for the steps all you gotta do is get some Plastruct or Evergreen I beams and place them where you think they would be structurally sound. Then they will look more supported.......it is not that big of a deal..............nice building..........Al

Very true ... but its still a good point by Alan. The chances that this would run through the brickwork would be minimal, as it would be conductor for damp, but as said already, a few bits of styrene could be added as support plates on the wall. I also agree this is one of MiniArts better building. As their inventory of forms increases, more architecture and shape is included in the buildings. This is particularily nice IMO.

Very true ... but its still a good point by Alan. The chances that this would run through the brickwork would be minimal, as it would be conductor for damp, but as said already, a few bits of styrene could be added as support plates on the wall. I also agree this is one of MiniArts better building. As their inventory of forms increases, more architecture and shape is included in the buildings. This is particularily nice IMO. [/quote] Gotta love that photo. Lead singer of one of the greatest bands of all time. Lemmy of Motorhead. I saw him at the Cathouse in Hollywood in 87. At the bar, with a drink in his hand. Big surprise. : ) Cheers.

I agree, nice looking structure. Might have to invest in one myself. My only criticism is that in this case their "generic" doors and window frames are a little limited here. I can see how they are maximising moulds but can we have a little variation please ? Yeah, I know. I can sctratchbuild different doors and windows (and do) but I think it would improve the range considerably if Miniart did a few alternate sets of door & window sprues. Love 'em or hate 'em, Miniart have filled a gap in the market (no pun intended)and I love them. Then again, I work in architecture, so I know how they are supposed to look. Andy

This building could be used in a diorama for a modern settng. Detail looks amazing. Cookie

I agree with Paul. If you build it undamaged it would fit in perfectly as a building in Cold War Germany........Al

Heck, I was thinkin' it'd be great for a post apocalyptic diorama of my home town, The Bronx! Now we just need an iron "fire escape" typical for that region. As to the "no visible means of support" theory --- looks okay to me, but a little Plastruct I-beam goes a long way... I like that this structure is not tied to any particular region. Very cool! And yes, generic, undamaged buildings would be a nice choice as well. Regards and Aloha, Johnny B.