this is the tamiya M-60A1 with reactive armor , i also added a DML mine plow .The fox hole in the corner is based on a pic i found on a site some where i can't seem to remember .enjoy (++)
Constructive Feedback
For in-progress or completed build photos. Give and get contructive feedback!
For in-progress or completed build photos. Give and get contructive feedback!
Hosted by Darren Baker, Dave O'Meara
USMC-M-60A1 Desert Storm
turrettoad13
Mississippi, United States
Joined: February 26, 2003
KitMaker: 607 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Joined: February 26, 2003
KitMaker: 607 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 11:20 AM UTC
Kencelot
Florida, United States
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 11:30 AM UTC
I can't critique your model because I do not know enough about modern armor. And I can't let a good looking model job and dio pass by without saying something. It looks great.
HastyP
Ontario, Canada
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 1,117 posts
Armorama: 468 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 1,117 posts
Armorama: 468 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 11:51 AM UTC
Beauty Job. Love the earthwork and the canvas roles on the side. Excellent paint job as well.
Cheers
HastyP
Cheers
HastyP
Trackjam
Ontario, Canada
Joined: April 12, 2002
KitMaker: 831 posts
Armorama: 614 posts
Joined: April 12, 2002
KitMaker: 831 posts
Armorama: 614 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 11:55 AM UTC
That's quite a good job. The photos never do a model justice. Did you use headlight lenses or paint the headlights and IR light?
turrettoad13
Mississippi, United States
Joined: February 26, 2003
KitMaker: 607 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Joined: February 26, 2003
KitMaker: 607 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 12:11 PM UTC
Thanks for the comments so far guys. Paul, the headlights and the IR lights are painted on. I have since removed the barrel from the dio (didn't like it ). (++) :-)
Jeepney
Philippines
Joined: July 22, 2002
KitMaker: 1,538 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: July 22, 2002
KitMaker: 1,538 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 12:39 PM UTC
Very nice weathering Carlton! Looks like it has seen some action. The base also adds something to the overall effect
Selrach
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 04, 2003
KitMaker: 466 posts
Armorama: 378 posts
Joined: January 04, 2003
KitMaker: 466 posts
Armorama: 378 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 12:45 PM UTC
Looks great TT The weathering looks great. and the stowage looks wonderful
Great work
Great work
USMC0321
United States
Joined: April 14, 2003
KitMaker: 76 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: April 14, 2003
KitMaker: 76 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 12:59 PM UTC
Very nice, I am working on mine right now. It's only my second armor piece. Finishing up a Tamiya Wesepe. I am somewhat confused though. Is the markings for two desert M-60A1s? The marking instructions are not too clear in the instructions. So is Predator another option instead of the Genesis II: Shoot-n-Loot? Also I am guessing that the scorpion would not be on the Shoot-n-Loot M-60. Help anyone?
USMC0321
USMC0321
SS-74
Vatican City
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 01:28 PM UTC
Lord Tu,
This is awesome looking M60 you got there. Very effectively done. I can't comment on the accuracy or anything. But I like how it turned out. I am sure that with our new injection of expertise from the region, we will have some constructive comment soon.
Oh one more thing, is this me or the dry brush seems a little excessive... #:-)
This is awesome looking M60 you got there. Very effectively done. I can't comment on the accuracy or anything. But I like how it turned out. I am sure that with our new injection of expertise from the region, we will have some constructive comment soon.
Oh one more thing, is this me or the dry brush seems a little excessive... #:-)
TankCarl
Rhode Island, United States
Joined: May 10, 2002
KitMaker: 3,581 posts
Armorama: 2,782 posts
Joined: May 10, 2002
KitMaker: 3,581 posts
Armorama: 2,782 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 01:45 PM UTC
Tango,Tango,
Those tracks are fine,ref our chat earlier.
I used my magnifier in Windows to check,and those have the endconnectors and centerguides in the right place.
To me the drybrushing is fine. I gotta nit pick about the left "ski" on the plow,it seems off level.Are the real ones loosely mounted?
(++) (++) (++) (++) (++) (++) (++) (++)
Those tracks are fine,ref our chat earlier.
I used my magnifier in Windows to check,and those have the endconnectors and centerguides in the right place.
To me the drybrushing is fine. I gotta nit pick about the left "ski" on the plow,it seems off level.Are the real ones loosely mounted?
(++) (++) (++) (++) (++) (++) (++) (++)
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 03:35 PM UTC
Looks good, I like all your stowage on the kit. Very well done without being too unrealistic. Tines (teeth) on the mine plow look a little too new, same with the mold boards. I have a real good photo of an M60A1 blade tank in the Osprey Desert Storm Special Land Power book. Superb photo for weathering the tines. One interesting aspect is that the outer edges of the tines lose just about all paint. Photo shows the sand paint, green underpaint and rusted bare metal underneath. But the inner side of the tines show minimal wear.
Photo identifies the vehicle as an M60A3, this is incorrect. It is actually a USMC M60A1 RISE/Passive. Easy to tell since it lacks the thermal shroud and the Marines never used the A3 and the Army never operationally mounted ERA on the A3. This photo shows the headlight and IR light reversed from your kit, most folks wouldn't catch it so I wouldn't bother changing it.
Photo identifies the vehicle as an M60A3, this is incorrect. It is actually a USMC M60A1 RISE/Passive. Easy to tell since it lacks the thermal shroud and the Marines never used the A3 and the Army never operationally mounted ERA on the A3. This photo shows the headlight and IR light reversed from your kit, most folks wouldn't catch it so I wouldn't bother changing it.
Venom
Alessandria, Italy
Joined: July 28, 2003
KitMaker: 720 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: July 28, 2003
KitMaker: 720 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 04:17 PM UTC
very nice
Regards
Regards
mikeli125
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,595 posts
Armorama: 1,209 posts
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,595 posts
Armorama: 1,209 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 06:52 PM UTC
TT looks really cool makes me want to start my academy one! only one thing on the 1st picture it looks like there is a bit of silvering on the "v" decal or is this just because of the flash great work all the same
zer0_co0l
Limburg, Netherlands
Joined: January 04, 2003
KitMaker: 1,432 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: January 04, 2003
KitMaker: 1,432 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 07:05 PM UTC
Hi first I want 2 say cheers 2 a great model
but since this is the rivet review board and Im not allowed 2 say only that I have a question,
maybe suggestion?
I never build modern armor but the V shaped decals shoudn't they be with the point up like
/ I might be mistaken just my toughts.
and keep up the good work
HooaH
but since this is the rivet review board and Im not allowed 2 say only that I have a question,
maybe suggestion?
I never build modern armor but the V shaped decals shoudn't they be with the point up like
/ I might be mistaken just my toughts.
and keep up the good work
HooaH
zer0_co0l
Limburg, Netherlands
Joined: January 04, 2003
KitMaker: 1,432 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: January 04, 2003
KitMaker: 1,432 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 07:05 PM UTC
Hi first I want 2 say cheers 2 a great model
but since this is the rivet review board and Im not allowed 2 say only that I have a question,
maybe suggestion?
I never build modern armor but the V shaped decals shoudn't they be with the point up like
/ I might be mistaken just my toughts.
and keep up the good work
HooaH
but since this is the rivet review board and Im not allowed 2 say only that I have a question,
maybe suggestion?
I never build modern armor but the V shaped decals shoudn't they be with the point up like
/ I might be mistaken just my toughts.
and keep up the good work
HooaH
Grifter
North Carolina, United States
Joined: November 17, 2002
KitMaker: 608 posts
Armorama: 425 posts
Joined: November 17, 2002
KitMaker: 608 posts
Armorama: 425 posts
Posted: Monday, August 18, 2003 - 11:09 PM UTC
Zero,
Those V, or chevron,markings are company or divisional marks...can't remember exactly.....but they can point different directions depending on the vehicle.
Those V, or chevron,markings are company or divisional marks...can't remember exactly.....but they can point different directions depending on the vehicle.
slodder
North Carolina, United States
Joined: February 22, 2002
KitMaker: 11,718 posts
Armorama: 7,138 posts
Joined: February 22, 2002
KitMaker: 11,718 posts
Armorama: 7,138 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 - 12:26 AM UTC
The AFV looks great. I like it - the figure gives me a great sense of scale.
Coming from a diorama guy, the base is cool. I like the vertical scrapes on side in the 3rd photo. I would put that whole thing on a nicely stained piece of wood or tile or a picture frame. That would really make it stand out.
The sandbags - Tamiyas right? They are a bit 'stiff'. I personally would sculpt my out of sculpy. However having said that - the main subject isn't really the base at all so this doesn't detract from the M60.
Coming from a diorama guy, the base is cool. I like the vertical scrapes on side in the 3rd photo. I would put that whole thing on a nicely stained piece of wood or tile or a picture frame. That would really make it stand out.
The sandbags - Tamiyas right? They are a bit 'stiff'. I personally would sculpt my out of sculpy. However having said that - the main subject isn't really the base at all so this doesn't detract from the M60.
ahueger
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 214 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 214 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 - 07:34 AM UTC
Toadster,
real nice kit you have there. I wonder why you choose the Tamiya kit? The Academy kit is far superior. Anyway I really like the paint job you have done, what color did you use? I am still having an unbuild Desert Storm M60A1sitting on my shelf ... #:-)
cheers - Andreas -
real nice kit you have there. I wonder why you choose the Tamiya kit? The Academy kit is far superior. Anyway I really like the paint job you have done, what color did you use? I am still having an unbuild Desert Storm M60A1sitting on my shelf ... #:-)
cheers - Andreas -
Azevedo
Torino, Italy
Joined: June 27, 2002
KitMaker: 468 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: June 27, 2002
KitMaker: 468 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 - 03:32 PM UTC
Great job!!!
Congratulations
Congratulations
turrettoad13
Mississippi, United States
Joined: February 26, 2003
KitMaker: 607 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Joined: February 26, 2003
KitMaker: 607 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 - 10:54 PM UTC
Thanks again to everyone for the comments , this kit wll go back to the table for a few touch ups and corections with a up-date to follow . Sabot thanks for the great refference pic ! really needed that . 13 OUT.
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 21, 2003 - 01:44 AM UTC
How did you attach the plow to the front hull? Do you have some pictures that show this area of plow-equipped M60A1? I also have the Tamiya USMC M60A1 with Dragon plow attached and I think you attached it the same way I did, but looking at some pictures I have (including the one Rob posted here) I think it is not quite correct way to do it. The Dragon set is designed for Abrams, so I'm not sure if it contains correct parts for M60.
Did you install the armor plates behind/under the plow, or did you omit them?
I think I will rebuild my model one day, but will use Italeri/ESCI M60A1 as a basis and add Tamiya armor plates and Dragon plow from old model to it. I also will try to make one modification you missed (but I also missed it in my model...) - the weight of the plow causes the tank to be visibly tilted forward when the plow is in raised position. It should be quite easy modification of the model suspension to show it.
Rgds,
Pawel
Did you install the armor plates behind/under the plow, or did you omit them?
I think I will rebuild my model one day, but will use Italeri/ESCI M60A1 as a basis and add Tamiya armor plates and Dragon plow from old model to it. I also will try to make one modification you missed (but I also missed it in my model...) - the weight of the plow causes the tank to be visibly tilted forward when the plow is in raised position. It should be quite easy modification of the model suspension to show it.
Rgds,
Pawel
WeWillHold
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: April 17, 2002
KitMaker: 2,314 posts
Armorama: 1,905 posts
Joined: April 17, 2002
KitMaker: 2,314 posts
Armorama: 1,905 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 21, 2003 - 02:31 AM UTC
Toadster:
This thing is solid. I also have this kit, sans plow, and only wish it looked half as good as yours.
The base really sets the model off, and your stowage looks "real" and not slapped on. Figs look good, and the shading/weathering makes this whole thing "pop".
Congrats Lord Toad.
Steve
This thing is solid. I also have this kit, sans plow, and only wish it looked half as good as yours.
The base really sets the model off, and your stowage looks "real" and not slapped on. Figs look good, and the shading/weathering makes this whole thing "pop".
Congrats Lord Toad.
Steve
AJLaFleche
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: May 05, 2002
KitMaker: 8,074 posts
Armorama: 3,293 posts
Joined: May 05, 2002
KitMaker: 8,074 posts
Armorama: 3,293 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 21, 2003 - 03:00 AM UTC
The model looks good, I don't think the drybrushing is overdone. I concur withthe comment on the chevron in the first picture, it almost look like it's just an outline. Removing the barrel was a good decision, it looked a bit glossy.
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 21, 2003 - 04:08 AM UTC
Somewhere, I do not know where, I have the older mine plow TM that shows how to mount the mine plow on the M60 series tank as well as the AVLB hull. Unfortunately, I may have tossed it when I got the new mine plow TM. It only covers mounting the blade on the M1 series tank.
turrettoad13
Mississippi, United States
Joined: February 26, 2003
KitMaker: 607 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Joined: February 26, 2003
KitMaker: 607 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Posted: Friday, August 22, 2003 - 05:33 AM UTC
vodnik ,i did leave off the lower hull armor to prevent fit problems . i cheated and used a small screw to attach the plow , just in case this was in-accurate so it would be easy to remove