_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
News
MiniArt: Tiran 4 Late Type
Maki
Staff MemberSenior Editor
ARMORAMA
Visit this Community
Croatia Hrvatska
Joined: February 13, 2002
KitMaker: 5,579 posts
Armorama: 2,988 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 - 02:49 PM UTC


MiniArt released details of their upcoming Tiran 4 kit. Check it out!

Read the Full News Story

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!
RobinNilsson
Staff MemberTOS Moderator
KITMAKER NETWORK
Visit this Community
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 - 04:03 PM UTC
It looks as if there will be a lot of T-54/T-55 variants in the stash in the future I like their business model of packaging two different kits, with and without the interior, since my personal taste is to build with closed hatches. Maybe I should build at least one T-5x with the interior .....
Decisions, decisions ....
/ Robin
ReluctantRenegade
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: March 09, 2016
KitMaker: 2,408 posts
Armorama: 2,300 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 - 04:07 PM UTC
Nice! I also like the variety of finishing options. The second one though (SLA, Negev Desert, early ‘80s) is probably a mistake...
RobinNilsson
Staff MemberTOS Moderator
KITMAKER NETWORK
Visit this Community
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 - 04:30 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Nice! I also like the variety of finishing options. The second one though (SLA, Negev Desert, early ‘80s) is probably a mistake...



Maybe they had travelled south for a large scale training exercise
pod3105
Visit this Community
Waterford, Ireland
Joined: August 08, 2010
KitMaker: 466 posts
Armorama: 444 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 - 11:28 PM UTC
given they were supplied from Israeli stocks its not too much of a leap
ReluctantRenegade
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: March 09, 2016
KitMaker: 2,408 posts
Armorama: 2,300 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 - 12:24 AM UTC

Quoted Text

given they were supplied from Israeli stocks its not too much of a leap



I think simply the title is wrong. It’s probably an IDF vehicle in the Negev Desert, early ‘80s. It might have been even used for training SLA tankers, but it’s almost certainly not an SLA tank based down there.
RobinNilsson
Staff MemberTOS Moderator
KITMAKER NETWORK
Visit this Community
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 - 01:40 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

given they were supplied from Israeli stocks its not too much of a leap



I think simply the title is wrong. It’s probably an IDF vehicle in the Negev Desert, early ‘80s. It might have been even used for training SLA tankers, but it’s almost certainly not an SLA tank based down there.



It's sort of a north/south of the border thing


SLA is based in the southern parts of Lebanon, the Negev is in the south of Israel....
Sort of like Canadian tanks in markings for Mojave desert.
/ Robin
Precious_rob
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: March 09, 2009
KitMaker: 206 posts
Armorama: 183 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 - 07:56 AM UTC
Its odd because the Takom Tiran 4 also has an option for a Negev Desert markings.
ReluctantRenegade
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: March 09, 2016
KitMaker: 2,408 posts
Armorama: 2,300 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 - 03:55 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Its odd because the Takom Tiran 4 also has an option for a Negev Desert markings.



Also marked as SLA?
ReluctantRenegade
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: March 09, 2016
KitMaker: 2,408 posts
Armorama: 2,300 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 21, 2018 - 01:44 PM UTC

Quoted Text

It might have been even used for training SLA tankers



Well, apparently this is it (this picture of the finishing options was taken from MiniArt's website; the capture is indeed slightly different and makes much more sense).

 _GOTOTOP