135
Greetings from the Eastern Front


External construction
The kit from Tamiya does represent a StuG III Ausf G in one early version, but not the first ones, that were fielded. What were the differences between the kit and the first version? Here follows the features of the first "G"-version, which came to the units in the end of 1942:
· a driver observation slit left of his station,
· steeper angles of the lateral structure front armoring,
· no MG shield,
· no periscope protection at the roof,
· the fan installed onto the center of the roof instead at the middle of rear wall of the fighting compartment,
· a " driver vision port ,type 50' ", as well as the view holes for the driver telescope above it, therefore also,
· a divided additional armor in front of the driver workstation and,
· no " mushrooms " as mounts for the auxiliary crane at the top of the roof.

Since my vehicle should however represent a version, used in autumn ´43, I assembled the following features:

· MG shield (fielded starting from December 1942),
· screwed on additional armor at the bow plates and in front of the driver-, resp. loaders area (produced by the companies from ´42 to partly [MIAG-company] October ´43),
· early version of the tracks without grab lugs (manufactured to end of ´43)

I removed kit items or did not represent:
· the " mushrooms " at the hull roof (only built from ´44 onwards)
· the side skirts (manufactured for new vehicles starting from April ´43, delivered to the units as tool kit in June ´43, with priority to those, which were involved in the Kursk offensive),
· the smoke grenade launchers (production from February to May ´43, then removed because of self-endangerment),
· the deflector ramps for the chain pins protection (only generally introduced, starting from ´44 as a company-supply

I completed or improved:
· a pistol plug left of the driver (starting from December ´42, TAMIYA forgot this plug!)
· the mounts of the blackout drive light (aluminum sheet and copper braid),
· the brackets for tools and equipment (aluminum sheet and -foil, photo etched parts from ABER),
· hatches (partly made new from plastic sheet, wire and the nuts/bolts by the" Punch and die" set),
· antennas inclusive their mounting plates (hypodermic needles, steel wire, fishing rod wire, aluminum sheet), the asterisk antenna are soldered together wires,
· the tail railing (soldered brass),
· the screens on the cooling intakes (photo etched part from my spare box),
· the tow rope (cable wire from a bicycle shop),
· the reserve antenna supports (hypodermic needle, plastic strips and aluminum sheet),
· I represented engagement damages at the fenders by sanding them down to almost "see through"-thickness and then punctured them with a craftsknive. At the rear I replaced the splash guards by an aluminum sheet, on which the profile, provided by the kit, thinly polished again, was glued.
· the fire extinguisher (tube of a car antenna, photo etched parts from ABER)

Additionally the surface of the armor was preparated: loose-handed I let "bounce" a sanding tool, which was attached in a mini drill, across the hull armor plates. So the rough structure of the cast armor is done "en miniature". Be careful, not to overdo this effect. German armor is - compared to other countries´ armor - very smooth!

About the Author

About Viking
FROM: WIEN, AUSTRIA

Starting with aircraft models in 1:72 scale, I soon switched to armour and figures. But only since 1998 I´m seriously concerned with the topic of diorama-, tank-, vehicle-, and figure construction. Running my homepage: "Wikingers Panzermodellbau" also tak...


Comments

That is great work. Very, very nice and richly detailed. Love those well used road wheels.
APR 08, 2002 - 07:29 PM
What a masterpiece you did! I specially loved the battle damages and the painting techniques. Keep up the excellent work (and don't mind to take about half an year to complete such beautiful pieces! ) Cheers!
APR 08, 2002 - 07:45 PM
Simply outstanding work...marvelousness! :-)
APR 08, 2002 - 07:52 PM
Modeling at its best. George, you have me torn between giving up the hobby (since I will never be able to produce such beautiful pieces) or kidnapping you to my basement, where I will make you show me exactly how to reproduce the wonderful techniques you used. You really should be proud of what you accomplished. And, thank you for the terrific article. I know it's good when I find myself saying "Shit, why didn't I think of that" over and over as I read how you did it. I hope we see more of your work on display here. Mike
APR 08, 2002 - 08:28 PM
Wow!!! Great work there! The painting, the figures, the tank interior. The little details like the damaged road wheels. It's the little details that make a great model better. I can relate to the builder when he says Heh, I've been reasonably upset when a model I was building just wasn't turning into what I wanted! YodaMan
APR 08, 2002 - 08:29 PM
Well, I'm sure everyone thinks that about their skills. The trick is to just keep trying! This is precisely the reason Armorama exists! And if George dosen't want to give us a how-to at first, I'm sure someone will bug him until he does! YodaMan
APR 08, 2002 - 08:32 PM
Thanks Yoda, for the vote of confidence. I know practice makes perfect, but man, people here produce some really high-grade stuff. What I meant by the second part, about watching George do his thing, is about how people learn, I guess. In grade school, given a project to make paper Thanksgiving items, others would make lovely Pilgrims, turkeys, etc., and I was the guy in the back with one thumb glued to his eyelid, and the other up his "blo-hole". I just have a little trouble visualizing instructions off a written page. But, if I see something done once, I can usually duplicate the effort quite nicely. For instance, I read a number of articles on painting and weathering aircraft. I played around with a few techniques, but wasn't real happy with the results. Then I found some Video Workshop tapes by Charles Davenport, who covered the topic. Just seeing how others did it, improved my work considerably. It was the same material, just basic painting/weathering techniques, but seeing it done made all the difference for me. I do appreciate the written tips and techniques, don't get me wrong. They get me thinking and trying new things. But sometimes I think how nice it would be to actually watch a master at work. Mike
APR 08, 2002 - 10:40 PM
Yeah I know what you mean. Sure it's easy to tell people how to do stuff, but it's a lot easier to learn if someone's there with you. YodaMan
APR 08, 2002 - 10:47 PM
Outstanding work! Museum quality stuff. Look on page 10 of the article and you will find a link to more of Georges work. It's worth a look. Good stuff George. :-)
APR 09, 2002 - 12:02 AM
Hello friends! Thank you for your positive reaction to my dio! As "mj" stated: I played around with a few techniques, but wasn't real happy with the results. it was also on me to "play". Sometimes I try two month to finish the colors of a vehicle in the desired way and on the way to the result it sometimes looks as if I´d better throw it into the waste basket... So my painting sometimes also consists of "recovering" bad stages of paintwork. One must knock his way trough this problems to get to a somewhat acceptable result. The problem is: how to tell others about the growing of the paintwork? My next item will be an Afrika dio about the L.R.D.G. (next year?) In the meantime visit: Wikinger´s Panzermodellbau or: Die Luftwaffe im Modell (German "Luftwaffe" in models)
APR 09, 2002 - 05:51 PM