135
A Tale of Three Jeeps

  • move
Canvas frame
Tamiya and Bronco basically have the same layout and include the straps in the plastic part. DML has a more complicated setup and separate PE straps. All three work well, though personally I prefer the Tamiya and Bronco approach, as it is much simpler. Also, the frames are of slightly different thickness on the DML kit.

Jerry cans
All three have a somewhat different approach. DML and Tamiya have the same basic breakdown of the parts, but DML is more detailed (lid) and has a separate rack from PE. Bronco includes the rack but has a different breakdown. On a practical note, the handle on the DML kit is connected to the sprue with three (!) attachment points, which makes cleanup unnecessarily complicated and of course I broke the part while cleaning it. Both Bronco and Tamiya were able to make one attachment at the base, so I don’t see that it should be so hard?

Keeping with the DML part, be sure to cut off the locating lugs on the main parts, because if you don’t the parts won’t line up. The DML rack is made up of two parts. It’s not that easy to fold and align them correctly, I just got them lined up as best I could and then put a load of Mr. Surfacer on the edges as well as the folding creases around the round edges. After a quick pass with the file the part looks quite nice. Overall, I think it’s worth the effort, as then not all Jeeps in the modeling world will have the Jerry can facing the same direction and you have the option to leave it empty or include different kinds of jerry cans. The strap from PE leaves too much slack if folded as intended. I replaced the strap with tape and added the buckle from the PE strap.

No issues were encountered with the other manufacturers, except for the attachment of the Bronco Jerry can to the Jeep. There seems to be no attachment point, which would add any strength to the assembly. I decided to add a little shim from plastic leftovers.

Another note by Gino P. Quitiliani here: “The early script jeeps (Ford and Willys) did not come with fuel cans. The fuel can is not intended to be mounted if you want to have an early script GPW, hence the FORD on the rear plate and no mounting pins. The fuel can was added later in the field and it went right over where the Ford script is, so you can add it for a later jeep.” This should explain the lack of attachment points. Only later did I notice that the jerry can rack is indicated as optional in the instructions. I would nevertheless have expected some sort of attachment point.

  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move

About the Author

About Stefan Halter (Dangeroo)
FROM: ZURICH, SWITZERLAND

I'll build just about anything military related that gets my interest, though most of it is 1/35 scale WWII Allied.


Comments

Great feature, Stefan. No surprise that Bronco kit is the best, but I am a bit surprised that Dragon is THAT bad!
AUG 23, 2013 - 12:00 AM
Thanks guys! Don't get me wrong, it's not THAT bad, it just doesn't offer any advantage over the other two.
AUG 23, 2013 - 12:16 AM
Great work Stefan !! Very Nice finished Models and very, very interesting comparison test... Especially as I am -slowly- building two tamiya jeeps in order To "up date" them with a Nice résine set from Legend, and a bronco jeep is on Its Way to me via air mail... BRAVO and once again congratulations.
AUG 23, 2013 - 10:00 AM
Wow, this is simply one of the best features we've had on Armorama in some time! GREAT work, Stefan. Terrific detail, superb layout of the build, and some excellent information that will make picking kits much easier for most of us. Thanks!
AUG 24, 2013 - 03:25 AM
Great article and thanks for putting it all together for us.
AUG 24, 2013 - 01:46 PM
Excellent comparisons on all 3! Had been contemplating buying the DML, but now my money would be better spent on Bronco.
AUG 25, 2013 - 08:50 PM
Very good comparison, thanks for the work Stefan! Great to see the parts next to each other, in many cases that explains more than many words. Very thorough article on my favorite subject! I have the Tamiya one, and the next is going to be Bronco... Cheers Alex
SEP 06, 2013 - 08:44 AM
Awesome article Stefan! I'm going to be picking up a Bronco kit in the near future and I've got a 1:1 scale 42 GPW in my garage right now. My question though is how does the old Italeri kit compare? I know that the three kits reviewed here are far newer and incorporate a lot of better mold making technology since the Italeri showed up two decades ago. Thanks! Jon
SEP 06, 2013 - 11:29 AM
Thank you for the nice comments, gentlemen! I am glad to have been of help. Jon, can't really say about the Italeri kit. I only built the commandocar long time ago and as I remember it wasn't a bad kit, but not as good as Tamiya. With a bit of TLC I'm sure it can be brought up to speed and versions of it are still widely available and for good prices too. Cheers! Stefan
SEP 07, 2013 - 02:52 AM
Hi Stefan, A very informative article and 3 great results. You put a lot of time and effort into the comparison which will be of great benefit to many. Congrats on a fine article. Al
OCT 11, 2013 - 07:13 AM