135
Churchill Never Looked So Good

Construction

Tamiya’s Churchill has been released in the 80ies and much to my surprise there are some sinkholes on certain parts of the kit. I did not expect that and I also cannot recall that any review pointing on this. Kit construction is straightforward and without the conversion it would have taken 3 days to complete this beast. The AL-BY conversion consists of a hollow turret, the mortar ( moveable ), the rectangular hatches for the side sponsons and the frontal armour of the upper hull.

On earlier Marks a part this frontal armour is set back a bit, while on the Mark VII the whole armour is straight. Thus the upper front armour of the kit does not fit with AL-BY’s front plate. I rebuilt the front and front upper armour from plastic sheet and added details according pictures and photographs. I also had to remove the 3 periscopes ( driver & co driver ), shortened 2 in height and added them again

Comparing the side sponsons of Mark IV and Mark VII opened many distinctions. Apart from the different hatches Mark VII sponsons were welded and up-armoured, earlier Marks had them bolted. The design of the opening behind the idler wheel is different. Earlier Marks also had a slide which handled the dirt gushing from this hole. I cut off 2/3 of the outer sponsons and rebuilt them with plasticsheet, the slide has been built from Evergreen L-profiles. The smaller bolts were produced with a Grainers Set and 0,4mm Plastic. The big nuts come from a baby rattle which I was begging for from a friend of my wife ( THANKS, Doris ! )

While I was examining photos I discovered, that all Churchill AVRE’s with Petard-Mortar had strange holders fixed on the side sponson. I was puzzled about the functionality, as they were too delicate to carry a dozer but finally I got the conclusion.
The holders were intended to fix a frame for a bobbin of canvas designed to lay a 10ft. wide carpet over soft sand. Infantry was due to follow the tank on this carpet. After landing these bobbins were removed from the tanks. Obviously there were different versions of this holders in use and due to lack of time I decided to scratchbuilt the easiest one. At the rear a small box has to be removed, which results in a hole which I covered with a larger box from Verlinden.

Copyright ©2002 - Text by Werner Kampfhofer (tankbuster). Photos by Wolfram Bradac. All Rights Reserved.

Project Photos
CLICK TO ENLARGE


 


 

 

About the Author

About Werner Kampfhofer (tankbuster)
FROM: WIEN, AUSTRIA


Comments

Werner--Danke. Great job as always. DJ
AUG 06, 2002 - 02:15 AM
I hope everyone is going all the way to the END of the article. That's where all the finished pics are. Really I don't understand why this article has been read so much less than others. Is the Churchill that disliked?? Jim
AUG 27, 2002 - 01:48 PM
No Jim. I was stuck at work for the past month and am now just discovering it! Very, very nice job Werner! I love it's ugliness so much it's beautiful. Really!
AUG 27, 2002 - 05:29 PM
I've always found the Churchill interesting. I have a couple 1/72 AVRE's with small box-girder bridges, an AMRCR, a Mk. 7, a Mk. 1 and a Mk. 2CS. If you want, its not impossible to make the full AVRE family. A facine carrier would be an easy mod for the old Matchbox AVRE and once you got the framework for the bobbin made, the matting wouldn't be hard to do---just check your local fabric shop, same for material for netting and base for hessian. It would be nice if someone out there in the world made detail parts to help us out some with small scale mods and conversions. I'm looking for 2 sets of production air intakes to graft onto a Hasagawa Mk. 1 and a Mk. 2CS for a Deippe diorama without having to cannibilize from other kits.
AUG 27, 2002 - 06:25 PM
hi may i say it is finished very nicely but!! to be correct. the main two points i have on the tank are :- (1) you have forgot to include the sliding Loaders hatch . this is where the Petard was loaded. (2) no AVRE that i have seen photographs or from crew man or my farther would ever fit a tool box on the rear everything was tied on the rear. main reason was because of fitting of the winch. some stowage boxes were fitted here but they had two "u" shape bits of metal which went in to the grills. historic notes. designed by Lt Deneveon Candian ME Company after the failure of Dieppie. the Petard was always called a flying Dustbin or Petard. a Wade Charge is a seperate charge stowed in side in the pannier doors to which the crew would climb out & attach to a obsticale to be destroyed. the fixings on the side are the CIRD fittings used as rightly said for attaching differant equipments. these were not fitted to Italian AVRE's, nice looking model ossie
MAR 18, 2004 - 07:40 AM
I never saw the feature....pity really as it is truly brilliant.....Jim
MAR 18, 2004 - 07:49 AM
woah cool thats the churchill thats on my british tanks rule tshirt.!!!! cooool nice piece of work!
MAR 18, 2004 - 08:46 AM
I first read this article as I see in the Dutch forum translating the Dutch article to English,glad to see the original now . The built ,the article and translation was all great :-) congrats Werner and Juul.
MAR 18, 2004 - 07:10 PM
Now finishing my Churchill Crocodile , the mudding tracks work has been usefull to me and i have seen this article time ago . Very good work
MAR 18, 2004 - 07:39 PM
good article as resicast do a conversion for it as well and I think cromwell are supposed to be doing one Legend also has a conversion kit as well thinking of doing one got 3 churchhill tucked away and needing built!
MAR 19, 2004 - 06:21 AM