Sherman in all its variants.
Tiger I
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
Tanks
csch
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Joined: December 27, 2002
KitMaker: 1,941 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: December 27, 2002
KitMaker: 1,941 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 - 05:50 AM UTC
JimF
Texas, United States
Joined: July 05, 2002
KitMaker: 717 posts
Armorama: 621 posts
Joined: July 05, 2002
KitMaker: 717 posts
Armorama: 621 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 - 06:06 AM UTC
I go along with Faust... I like different things about a variety of AFV's, but the Stug's are probably my favorites right now, especailly as a Sturmi (Finnish Stug III G)
yagdpanzer
Ohio, United States
Joined: August 21, 2002
KitMaker: 415 posts
Armorama: 231 posts
Joined: August 21, 2002
KitMaker: 415 posts
Armorama: 231 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 - 07:01 AM UTC
Pz111 in all it's varients. The Pz111 was the first tank that embodied all the features of modern tanks.
The Soviets almost cancelled the T-34 after testing an early Pz111.
The Soviets almost cancelled the T-34 after testing an early Pz111.
jackhammer
North Carolina, United States
Joined: November 12, 2002
KitMaker: 357 posts
Armorama: 310 posts
Joined: November 12, 2002
KitMaker: 357 posts
Armorama: 310 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 - 07:32 AM UTC
AAAAHHHHHHHH..................FAMO!!!!!!! Eerrrr...uhmmm....ehm,ehm......I mean the Panther!
Bravo21
Washington, United States
Joined: February 07, 2003
KitMaker: 78 posts
Armorama: 63 posts
Joined: February 07, 2003
KitMaker: 78 posts
Armorama: 63 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 - 09:24 AM UTC
Favorite WW-II tank? That's a tough one but for me it's got to be the Sherman. The shear quantity of them gave them a quality all their own. It may not have been the best thing on the battlefield but there were just too many interesting variations. My favorite Shermans are the M4A1 in British service in North Africa and the M4A3E2 Jumbo.
Running a close second in my book is the M3 Stuart, much for the same reasons halfyank cited: I used to read that silly Haunted Tank comic religiously!
Running a close second in my book is the M3 Stuart, much for the same reasons halfyank cited: I used to read that silly Haunted Tank comic religiously!
Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 - 09:34 AM UTC
Yet another T34 vote. Splash on a abit of dust and a bit of rust and you´ve got a winner! What drew me to this tank was the exhausts. Loved watching who they always stood out as bing so rusty. Lots of guys build clean American and clean German vehicles, but has anybody ever built a clean russian vehicle?
Howitzer
United States
Joined: February 24, 2003
KitMaker: 232 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: February 24, 2003
KitMaker: 232 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 - 11:13 AM UTC
I'm glad I asked the question. Put me down for the King Tiger .
N8SPI
United States
Joined: January 14, 2003
KitMaker: 18 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: January 14, 2003
KitMaker: 18 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 - 12:19 PM UTC
I like building all of them, my 13-year old likes the M-26 Purshing and the Sherman.
Howitzer
United States
Joined: February 24, 2003
KitMaker: 232 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: February 24, 2003
KitMaker: 232 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 - 01:29 PM UTC
Isnt it spelled PERSHING?
sgtreef
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: March 01, 2002
KitMaker: 6,043 posts
Armorama: 4,347 posts
Joined: March 01, 2002
KitMaker: 6,043 posts
Armorama: 4,347 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 - 02:03 PM UTC
This is tough one Well The T/34 to me always spoke of speed as compared to the Brute force of the German tanks. But the Tiger one is a great brute of a tank. Goosh can't really pick one
bracomadar
Arkansas, United States
Joined: March 01, 2003
KitMaker: 410 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: March 01, 2003
KitMaker: 410 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 - 03:17 PM UTC
As far as looking just cool, it would be a toss up between a Churchill Mk. VII. and an M3 Lee.
Howitzer
United States
Joined: February 24, 2003
KitMaker: 232 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: February 24, 2003
KitMaker: 232 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 - 11:51 AM UTC
Wow I didn't expect this many results. Hope everyone liked readind it. Danka.
SS-74
Vatican City
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 - 08:21 PM UTC
Tiger I, Nashorn, Stugs, Jagdpanther.
Posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 - 08:42 PM UTC
Mine is the Pzkw lV, the most flexible tank of all time. The chassis has been used for a lot of different types and platforms, than any other armored vehicle.
Chris Leader of the Massive Swine Takeover
Chris Leader of the Massive Swine Takeover
Halfyank
Colorado, United States
Joined: February 01, 2003
KitMaker: 5,221 posts
Armorama: 1,245 posts
Joined: February 01, 2003
KitMaker: 5,221 posts
Armorama: 1,245 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2003 - 03:59 AM UTC
pak40
Not to take anything away from the PzIV but I think the Sherman has to be the all time champ for different platforms. There were over 50 different variants listed just in the US army, not counting all the other Allied forces and Israel.
Quoted Text
The chassis has been used for a lot of different types and platforms, than any other armored vehicle.
Not to take anything away from the PzIV but I think the Sherman has to be the all time champ for different platforms. There were over 50 different variants listed just in the US army, not counting all the other Allied forces and Israel.
Monte
Rhode Island, United States
Joined: December 08, 2002
KitMaker: 833 posts
Armorama: 601 posts
Joined: December 08, 2002
KitMaker: 833 posts
Armorama: 601 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2003 - 08:13 AM UTC
With out a doubt the Tiger I. Tthe Panther and Jagpanther were great also but for pure brute force it had to be the Tiger.
shad
Hainaut, Belgium
Joined: February 17, 2003
KitMaker: 11 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: February 17, 2003
KitMaker: 11 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2003 - 08:18 AM UTC
The King Tiger is also my favorite !
Still have to build my 1/16 one from Tamiya... :-)
phil
Still have to build my 1/16 one from Tamiya... :-)
phil
Noodles
Cork, Ireland
Joined: January 27, 2003
KitMaker: 75 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: January 27, 2003
KitMaker: 75 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2003 - 08:21 AM UTC
the matilda mk2 i think gets my vote.it just looks the business.
otherwise the king tiger.
otherwise the king tiger.
zululand66
New Jersey, United States
Joined: August 07, 2002
KitMaker: 233 posts
Armorama: 216 posts
Joined: August 07, 2002
KitMaker: 233 posts
Armorama: 216 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2003 - 10:32 AM UTC
Hi All,
I'd have to say the T-34. Something like 30 countries have used them from 1940 to 2003! Lots and lots of variants, plus at least a million different markings, not to mention the conversions done (T-34/122 etc). Truly neato! I've built at least 20 or so in the past 20 years!
Sorry to be a nit-picker here, but the quote below is kinda wrong: "The T-34 had lots of design features that are still used in tank design today -- low profile, "dead track" (no return rollers), rear drive, diesel engine, sloping armor ... " "Dead track" refers to the track's design to roll up. This helped the track stay on the suspension. American tanks were some of the first to use them (Stuart family, I think). They are complicated and expensive to make incomparison with "dead track" links. The reason for the "roll-up" feature has to do with the construction of the link: the track block has two boltssticking out of the sides. the bolts contain machined notches that when the end-connector is placed over them is exposed. A wedge-bolt is put in the end-connector and tightened. The causes tension to be put on the two block and they try to roll up. Russian armor didn't upgrade to this style until the 1970's.
Regards,
Georg
I never make the same mistake twice, I make new ones
I'd have to say the T-34. Something like 30 countries have used them from 1940 to 2003! Lots and lots of variants, plus at least a million different markings, not to mention the conversions done (T-34/122 etc). Truly neato! I've built at least 20 or so in the past 20 years!
Sorry to be a nit-picker here, but the quote below is kinda wrong: "The T-34 had lots of design features that are still used in tank design today -- low profile, "dead track" (no return rollers), rear drive, diesel engine, sloping armor ... " "Dead track" refers to the track's design to roll up. This helped the track stay on the suspension. American tanks were some of the first to use them (Stuart family, I think). They are complicated and expensive to make incomparison with "dead track" links. The reason for the "roll-up" feature has to do with the construction of the link: the track block has two boltssticking out of the sides. the bolts contain machined notches that when the end-connector is placed over them is exposed. A wedge-bolt is put in the end-connector and tightened. The causes tension to be put on the two block and they try to roll up. Russian armor didn't upgrade to this style until the 1970's.
Regards,
Georg
I never make the same mistake twice, I make new ones
panzer_fan
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 25, 2003
KitMaker: 427 posts
Armorama: 348 posts
Joined: March 25, 2003
KitMaker: 427 posts
Armorama: 348 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 - 02:03 PM UTC
For me Tiger I will always be the favourite.
Kind regards,
Sebastian
Kind regards,
Sebastian
ongjeff
Joined: March 06, 2002
KitMaker: 18 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
KitMaker: 18 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 - 11:23 PM UTC
Panzer III in African Corp my favourite.