Quoted Text
The orginal M1A1 AIM kit had some issues with the instructions on the location of photoetch parts on the side skirts (and I believe) the engine decks. Do you know if the instructions on the new SEP kit have been corrected for these parts?
I think the only problem with location of PE parts on side skirts was that it was not clearly shown and unfortunately it's still the same in SEP instructions (M1 Panther II kit had much clearer diagram). Also one of side skirt PE strips was wrong length for the plastic part - this error was corrected and all parts should fit properly (if attached in correct place, which as I wrote above is not always clear). Error with placement of PE engine mesh screens was corrected in SEP instructions.
Quoted Text
Also, as a small gripe, why do the kit decals all represent earlier 2003-2004 circa tanks? I'd like my kit to have the latest hardware (hawker batteries and extended bustle rack) but none of the decals are applicable. Any reason why they could not have included at least one decal option for a current SEP tank?
Because Hawker battery modification was very fresh thing when the kit was in development and at that moment we still were not able to obtain complete set of markings for any such modified tank - we only had a set of close-up shots of new hull panels on freshly modified tank. So our choices were: not include Hawker setup parts in the kit at all, or include them, but without corresponding markings. Was it a wrong decision that we selected the second option?
And BRE? Well, it's in the kit, because I wanted to have it there to use it with various Abrams projects - not necessarily M1A2SEP. That's it. It would probably be there even if no M1A2SEP tanks carried it at all. You can consider it a bonus part from me

Quoted Text
When are you going to start working on a new M2A3 Bradely with reactive armor?
Probably never... In fact some two years ago DML briefly considered releasing new Bradley kits in 1/35 and I even started collecting reference materials (Pete Becerra can confirm), but the idea was quickly abandoned for various reasons before any design work was done. Instead they focused on 1/72 scale Bradleys.
Pawel