Illinois, United States
Joined: January 19, 2006
KitMaker: 657 posts
Armorama: 456 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 21, 2008 - 12:14 AM UTC
hey,
Just finishing up on my build for this campaign,I built Cyber-Hobby 7.5cm Stu.Kan.auf Pz.Kpfw.38(t) .Interesting little vehicle,built OOB,Instructions,sure could have been a little better.I left it Dunkelgelb,no camo or insignia,as it may have been seen on the proving grounds during tests.
Joe
Istanbul, Turkey / Türkçe
Joined: December 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,163 posts
Armorama: 842 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 21, 2008 - 01:22 AM UTC
Greetings all,
I have started my E-100 kit a few days ago. It is the old Dragon offering, kind of hard to find nowadays. Comes with its own set of problems, I had purchased the kit second-hand. While it looked mint (the sprues were in their wrappings even), it has a damaged body. Seems like its previous owner has mispackaged the interior and bent the hull floor(price for buying a second hand kit). I am struggling to put everything back in shape, let's see what happens.
Even still incomplete, this thing is enormous! The turret itself is as large as a 3-ton Opel Blitz truck. How the Germans thought they would haul a 100-ton beast this size around the battlefield is a question to be asked, indeed...
Hopefully I will get my compressor repaired soon and be enable to paint once again. Once my CPA exam is over, I hope I'll have time to properly complete this kit.
Pictures will follow once the glue sets.
Proud Supporter of Armorama Campaigns
Ontario, Canada
Joined: January 17, 2005
KitMaker: 58 posts
Armorama: 26 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 27, 2008 - 04:44 AM UTC
Im doing a Canadian Skink. Its a really wretched resin conversion kit from brazil, so Im not sure I'll actually be able to finish this in time, but Im giving it a shot.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b063e/b063eb65de86eda1db874fed1b9a2e9435e19358" alt=""
Only one was ever used in combat, of the two built, so it definitly qualifies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3cec/b3ceceb9f88f1ab9ba4bcebc3b73faf635dbcabd" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#041
Kobenhavn, Denmark
Joined: July 20, 2006
KitMaker: 10,069 posts
Armorama: 4,677 posts
Posted: Friday, March 28, 2008 - 12:54 AM UTC
Looks good, Mayer.
A little too clean for my taste, but if it just came of the line for testing then it is very reaslistic.
Great entry in the campaign
Campaign'oholic - 252+ campaigns completed
Removed by original poster on 04/10/08 - 13:23:35 (GMT).
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 25, 2005
KitMaker: 80 posts
Armorama: 63 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 02:31 AM UTC
My E-10 is done and photos posted on Kit Maker gallery. I have not mastered posting photos on this forum so if you want to see pics you have to go to the WW2 Experimental Campaign.
My sad brain is a vast cave filled with more dead than potter's field.
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 03:59 AM UTC
A lovely clean build Mayer, but like Jesper, a bit too clean for my tastes! Unless this has just rolled out of the factory doors it would have some sign of wear or dirt. Even a mild pin-wash to enhance some details would really bring out the details.
Also the reflector and convoy light on the rear could do with having their lenses painting.
A nice clean build though for sure!
James
Ontario, Canada
Joined: January 17, 2005
KitMaker: 58 posts
Armorama: 26 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 02:42 PM UTC
With the exception if the KV3 and my Skink...is there anyone else doing an allied build?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3cec/b3ceceb9f88f1ab9ba4bcebc3b73faf635dbcabd" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#145
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 22, 2006
KitMaker: 471 posts
Armorama: 383 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 02:57 PM UTC
Due to an issue with kids and glue my Maus was but on hold until I find some replacement parts. Don't ask. I have switch to a KV-2 1939 prottype as only 6 were built of this version berfor moving to the common 1940 model we all know.
Colorado, United States
Joined: December 25, 2004
KitMaker: 3,770 posts
Armorama: 2,263 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 04:35 PM UTC
Quoted Text
With the exception if the KV3 and my Skink...is there anyone else doing an allied build?
Yep! Russian A-40 Flying Tank!
Mike
Istanbul, Turkey / Türkçe
Joined: December 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,163 posts
Armorama: 842 posts
Posted: Friday, April 11, 2008 - 04:02 AM UTC
My E-100s became two now, since a friend has sent a Trumpeter E-100 as a gift. Will try to finish them both (though displaying them will be a problem, I think I'll need new shelves
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b063e/b063eb65de86eda1db874fed1b9a2e9435e19358" alt=""
)
Proud Supporter of Armorama Campaigns
Indiana, United States
Joined: May 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,117 posts
Armorama: 564 posts
Posted: Friday, April 11, 2008 - 11:05 AM UTC
"Treat 'em Rough", Current Builds--Wingnut Rumpler
I am frequently seen with blood shot eyes from staying up past my nap time to get the right colour scheme on my latest WWI model?
Istanbul, Turkey / Türkçe
Joined: December 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,163 posts
Armorama: 842 posts
Posted: Friday, April 11, 2008 - 03:12 PM UTC
Don't get me wrong Carl, but it sort of looks like a soda commercial. Applying the same idea to a civilian car using different colors might produce very interesting results. It looks kind of strange on a military vehicle.
Proud Supporter of Armorama Campaigns
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: December 30, 2006
KitMaker: 646 posts
Armorama: 473 posts
Posted: Friday, April 11, 2008 - 03:59 PM UTC
I like it
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c882/3c882b32c7afc0e322e3d3f865d3e1e122b9cd01" alt=""
If i was about to fire on it , the hesitation while looking at it might get me killed!!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2439/c2439d1a2b1ce43df29f5a836a4e56eb966a66eb" alt=""
Was it a real scheme or something you did
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c882/3c882b32c7afc0e322e3d3f865d3e1e122b9cd01" alt=""
A heavy weathering would tone it down but it's cool
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c882/3c882b32c7afc0e322e3d3f865d3e1e122b9cd01" alt=""
Thanks for the pics , Bob
Mom and Julie and Aunt Ruth, my dear Godmother, I miss you all and think of you everyday. I'll see you all again sometime:)
Indiana, United States
Joined: May 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,117 posts
Armorama: 564 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 10:41 AM UTC
Some Panthers actually did receive a disc pattern something like this. They did not look like a soda pop though. The disruptive pattern of the discs actually was very affective as a camo scheme. But the ambush pattern was easier to apply, and became the preffered camo. Some weathering would tone it down.
The pictures really dont do justice to the true effervescence of this build.
"Treat 'em Rough", Current Builds--Wingnut Rumpler
I am frequently seen with blood shot eyes from staying up past my nap time to get the right colour scheme on my latest WWI model?
North Carolina, United States
Joined: August 15, 2006
KitMaker: 408 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Friday, April 18, 2008 - 03:27 AM UTC
First, let me apologize for the late comment. I just noticed this campaign.
When I was a young 2nd Lt. I was briefly assigned temp duty in the Marine Corps Development Center while i was between schools. My primary job at the time was to microfilm old records of experimental equipment development from the 1920's on. At the time, I had no idea what a rich experience it was going to be. I only wish I could remember more than just a couple of the projects. The ones I do remember are as follows:
1. Mounting the 40mm turret of the M-42 Duster on an LVT-4 chassis.
2. Mounting the 40mm turret of the M-42 Duster on an LVT-5 chassis (post WWII).
3. A 155mm mortar that looked a lot like the 4.2in Chemical Mortar of the WWII era.
4. A set of bolt-on, rim-like devices that attached to the wheels of a jeep and had two uses. The first use was as capstans for the self recovery of the jeep when stuck in the mud. The second use was to engage cable-style bridging to allow the jeep to cross streams, wadis, etc. before full bridges could be deployed. (As I recall, this didn't work too well - the jeeps kept bouncing off the cables mid-stream.)
Man!!! I wish I could get at those records now! There were some really cool projects tried and dropped for various reasons.
Semper Fi,
Dave
Artillery lends dignity to what would otherwise be a vulgar brawl.
"Some people spend an entire life time wondering if they made a difference, but the United States Marines don't have that problem."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3cec/b3ceceb9f88f1ab9ba4bcebc3b73faf635dbcabd" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#041
Kobenhavn, Denmark
Joined: July 20, 2006
KitMaker: 10,069 posts
Armorama: 4,677 posts
Posted: Friday, April 18, 2008 - 08:36 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Some Panthers actually did receive a disc pattern something like this. They did not look like a soda pop though.
Carl, great effort you put into this build, but I agree with you that it does not look like the Panther camouflage. The difference is that the dots in the Panther camouflage were overlapping a little bit more. Your dots have more sand colour between them. Also some of your dots are very big compared to the Panther pattern. This is what makes it look different. However, making the small dot pattern on something as big as a Grille II would be an even more massive task that what you have already done.
I am really impressed by your great effort and skill in making this. It is impressive work even though you are not satisfied with the end result. I am planning to do the same on a late war Panther, but only on the side skirts. I do not have your kind of courage to do the whole tank.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78116/7811667d0a310b312607cad8feadb8abe352756e" alt=""
How the you make the circles for the masking?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89693/89693ad7756a36eedaed89875e0f9e521aeabb0b" alt=""
Campaign'oholic - 252+ campaigns completed
Colorado, United States
Joined: December 25, 2004
KitMaker: 3,770 posts
Armorama: 2,263 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 26, 2008 - 08:46 AM UTC
Quick update from my build-thread:
The rigging is done. I chose to have the boom rigging go
under the boom support:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b8a8/3b8a8fd415832acda3180eee8da0650257b689cf" alt=""
Next up is to do some final prep on the wing assembly to get it ready for the Russian Green. Then.....ugh, the tracks for the teeny-tiny tank.
Mike
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3cec/b3ceceb9f88f1ab9ba4bcebc3b73faf635dbcabd" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#041
Kobenhavn, Denmark
Joined: July 20, 2006
KitMaker: 10,069 posts
Armorama: 4,677 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 27, 2008 - 04:40 AM UTC
Quoted Text
My E-100s became two now, since a friend has sent a Trumpeter E-100 as a gift. Will try to finish them both (though displaying them will be a problem, I think I'll need new shelves
)
It could be very interesting to see these two builds next to each other. I have the feeling by looking at sprue shots that the Dragon E-100 is the best detailed. I might be wrong, since my initial judgement is based only on pictures from the net.
Campaign'oholic - 252+ campaigns completed
Lisboa, Portugal
Joined: March 04, 2008
KitMaker: 5,386 posts
Armorama: 4,727 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - 06:17 AM UTC
i think i'll join for this one too...
E-10 or Dicker Max - they are suitable right ?
Gotta hurry on this one !
Active Builds: 0
Active Campaigns: 0
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3cec/b3ceceb9f88f1ab9ba4bcebc3b73faf635dbcabd" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#041
Kobenhavn, Denmark
Joined: July 20, 2006
KitMaker: 10,069 posts
Armorama: 4,677 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - 07:59 PM UTC
Hi John, without being the campaign leader I think it is safe to say both are suitable for this campaign. I made the E-10 myself. Excellent kit!
Welcome onboard
Campaign'oholic - 252+ campaigns completed
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3cec/b3ceceb9f88f1ab9ba4bcebc3b73faf635dbcabd" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#145
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 22, 2006
KitMaker: 471 posts
Armorama: 383 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 01:36 AM UTC
Yes both are more then fine.
spongya
Associate EditorBudapest, Hungary
Joined: February 01, 2005
KitMaker: 2,365 posts
Armorama: 1,709 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 01:47 AM UTC
So, Scott, is the Karl mortar something that fits this campaign?
Please visit me at my blog: https://butterfingeredmodelbuilder.wordpress.com/
Lisboa, Portugal
Joined: March 04, 2008
KitMaker: 5,386 posts
Armorama: 4,727 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 03:22 AM UTC
I'll have an E-10 but there was a sweet Trumpeter Dicker Max at my LHS...
i 'll see right now i have an Old KTiger, a Panzer IV D, a Faun Transporter and a JSU-152 on my workbench...
Active Builds: 0
Active Campaigns: 0
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3cec/b3ceceb9f88f1ab9ba4bcebc3b73faf635dbcabd" alt="KitMaker Network Subscriber"
#145
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 22, 2006
KitMaker: 471 posts
Armorama: 383 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 04:20 AM UTC