_GOTOBOTTOM
Constructive Feedback
For in-progress or completed build photos. Give and get contructive feedback!
M103 U.S. Heavy Tank (in progress)
WeWillHold
Visit this Community
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: April 17, 2002
KitMaker: 2,314 posts
Armorama: 1,905 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2003 - 12:19 PM UTC
I am in the process of building the Commander Series M103 U.S. Heavy tank. This is a combined resin, photo-etch, and plastic kit that has been a pretty challenging build, (as I was not ready for what this kit does, or doesn’t, offer).

Many of the parts needed to complete this kit were simply not provided or were listed as parts, but not supplied. I have emailed the Company requesting several items including both rear fenders, the radio box, and several other things.

Some of this kit is very good, like the turret, which is a beautiful resin casting, and the tracks which are Academy’s. The photo etch parts and wire for the racks around the turret bustle are also well done.

However, the suspension mountings on the resin hull and the associated road wheels and shocks are very very disappointing, (lots of airpockets, missing resin from the pour, and gaps and edges). Frankly some of these parts were unusable. Luckily the spares box provided some replacement shocks, track return rollers, headlights, torsion bars, in addition, to the searchlight, decent lift rings, the 50-cal machine gun, and both turret mounted gas cans.

I want to thank John Mendoza, (aka Jeepney, aka "Da Man"), for pushing me along and providing encouragement to not give up on this one, (which was tempting). When completed it’s dedicated to my good friend from the Philippines.

Attached are some in progress pics. There are problems with this build, but please comment as you see fit. There are still many things to complete and paint/weather. Thanks.

From the start, the resin hull and turret with gun tube and mantlet


This is a lot of resin!










Tin_Can
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Joined: January 26, 2002
KitMaker: 1,560 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2003 - 12:24 PM UTC
That looks pretty slick so far. The antennae look very "wispy"-I think that was the word I was looking for. What did you use for them? Keep us updated.
WeWillHold
Visit this Community
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: April 17, 2002
KitMaker: 2,314 posts
Armorama: 1,905 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2003 - 12:28 PM UTC


For some reason I had trouble posting this pic--sorry
Selrach
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 04, 2003
KitMaker: 466 posts
Armorama: 378 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2003 - 02:19 PM UTC
Looking good so far. I like it! :-)

Can't wait to see more , Good job
Oberst
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: June 26, 2002
KitMaker: 851 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2003 - 03:22 PM UTC
Nice M 103 WWH. What are you holding anyway?
Nice to see some PE in there...
Who says I never comment on you work????

Andrew

SS-74
Visit this Community
Vatican City
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2003 - 03:25 PM UTC
Lord WWH,

Finally I am able to see these fine pics. As from the chat session, I was under the impression it was a difficult build, but you definitely did a good a job. I really like how the turret turned out.

You should've used this modelling skills to do more German stuff. #:-)
Manchu34
Visit this Community
Missouri, United States
Joined: March 08, 2002
KitMaker: 493 posts
Armorama: 361 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2003 - 05:24 PM UTC
If my opinion is worth anything. It looks good. can't wait to see it when completed
210cav
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 6,149 posts
Armorama: 4,573 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2003 - 10:22 PM UTC
Great subject to model and a superb job. Keep up the good work.
DJ
scoccia
Visit this Community
Milano, Italy
Joined: September 02, 2002
KitMaker: 2,606 posts
Armorama: 1,721 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2003 - 10:22 PM UTC
Very impressive "beast"! I heard about it only over the past days here on Armorama. Could you please give me/us a bit of background for it the only one thing I can understand is that it should belong to the "Patton" family (something like an M60 evolution)...
Thanks
WeWillHold
Visit this Community
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: April 17, 2002
KitMaker: 2,314 posts
Armorama: 1,905 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2003 - 01:28 AM UTC

Quoted Text

The antennae look very "wispy"-I think that was the word I was looking for. What did you use for them?


Tin: When making tow cables I use the woven picture frame wire. The antennae here are the result of unraveling the picture frame wire and using a single strand. "Wispy"--I like that . Thanks for the comments.


Quoted Text

Could you please give me/us a bit of background for it the only one thing I can understand is that it should belong to the "Patton" family (something like an M60 evolution)...



"The M103, the Heavy Tank variant of the M48 series, was designed to counter to the Soviet's JS III heavy tanks, which outclassed all other US tanks during the immediate period following World War II. At nearly 65 tons, it was by far the heaviest tank placed in service by the US Army prior to the advent of the M1 Abrams.

The strong family resemblance to the M48 was based on the components common to both vehicles. The suspension was similar to that of the M48, though modified to carry the increased weight. The M103 had one additional road wheel on each side, though unlike the M48 most of the M103's torsion arms had shock absorbers. Six return rollers were fitted, and the final-drives had much larger exposed gear-boxes.

While the M103 hull was similar in shape to the M48, it was longer and wider, and had thicker armor with better ballistic shape in the forward hull. The engine deck was unlike that of the M48. The turret was totally different, with a large bustle to enable the 120mm gun to recoil. The ballistic shape was excellent from the front, but poor from the rear. The machine gun mount was used to allow the gun to be trained, elevated, and fired from within the vehicle.

The M103A1 differed slightly from the M103, having improved fire-control devices that resulted in minor changes in the turret shape.

The M103A2 was the Heavy Tank variant of the M60 series. It had the large bulged rear engine deck, typical of the diesel engined M48 and M60. It saw service, with a few being around into the 1970's."

A description from GlobalSecurity.org


Jeepney
Visit this Community
Philippines
Joined: July 22, 2002
KitMaker: 1,538 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2003 - 12:33 PM UTC
Awesome build Beermeister!!! This beast is ugly in a nice sort of way. That turret looks huge and I can't imagine how the chassis can take the weight.

Thank you for dedicating this one to me. Your skills inspire me to finish my kits and bring them up to the same level as yours.

Keep up the good work pal! This one is for the official Armorama gallery!
 _GOTOTOP