thanks a bunch Don, I'm going with Apache then (Bison decals + DML M4A2).
I'll probably have more questions down the road.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Iwo Jima Sherman
Elad
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 27, 2007 - 05:45 PM UTC
gunnytank
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 27, 2007 - 05:57 PM UTC
Quoted Text
thanks a bunch Don, I'm going with Apache then (Bison decals + DML M4A2).
I'll probably have more questions down the road.
You welcome, just tell me how you like the Bison Decals. I might want a set for myself.
Don
Elad
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 28, 2007 - 02:04 AM UTC
no probs Don.
this will be a come back project as I havent done any model building for more than a year.
got lots of 90% done projects and thats why I wanted a new DML kit - something that wont occupy the workbench for a long time, a fast easy build with decent detail OOTB.
I guess it will still take quite some time to reach the decals stage but when I do I'll let you know how they are and if you want I may just send you the left overs as I believe you are more likely to model another USMC Sherman than I am.
this will be a come back project as I havent done any model building for more than a year.
got lots of 90% done projects and thats why I wanted a new DML kit - something that wont occupy the workbench for a long time, a fast easy build with decent detail OOTB.
I guess it will still take quite some time to reach the decals stage but when I do I'll let you know how they are and if you want I may just send you the left overs as I believe you are more likely to model another USMC Sherman than I am.
gunnytank
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 28, 2007 - 07:00 AM UTC
Quoted Text
no probs Don.
this will be a come back project as I havent done any model building for more than a year.
got lots of 90% done projects and thats why I wanted a new DML kit - something that wont occupy the workbench for a long time, a fast easy build with decent detail OOTB.
I guess it will still take quite some time to reach the decals stage but when I do I'll let you know how they are and if you want I may just send you the left overs as I believe you are more likely to model another USMC Sherman than I am.
That would be great, I would really appreciate that.
Thanks,
Don
Elad
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 28, 2007 - 07:41 AM UTC
stage II - figures.
I may want to pair the tank with a figure or two (always gives a sense of size and motion frozen in time).
would DML's new Tarawa figure set be historically correct for an Iwo Jima setting?
fatigue uniforms seems to be the same as their old Iwo Jima set and I believe the camoflauged HBT uniform is reversible.
all in action pics show the Marines' tanks driving buttoned up.
did Marines' doctrine dictate fighting with close hatches always?
this may affect my decision wether to include a tank crewman or an infantry figure (I dont want cluttered diorama, just a figure or two).
I may want to pair the tank with a figure or two (always gives a sense of size and motion frozen in time).
would DML's new Tarawa figure set be historically correct for an Iwo Jima setting?
fatigue uniforms seems to be the same as their old Iwo Jima set and I believe the camoflauged HBT uniform is reversible.
all in action pics show the Marines' tanks driving buttoned up.
did Marines' doctrine dictate fighting with close hatches always?
this may affect my decision wether to include a tank crewman or an infantry figure (I dont want cluttered diorama, just a figure or two).
gunnytank
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 28, 2007 - 08:11 AM UTC
Quoted Text
stage II - figures.
I may want to pair the tank with a figure or two (always gives a sense of size and motion frozen in time).
would DML's new Tarawa figure set be historically correct for an Iwo Jima setting?
fatigue uniforms seems to be the same as their old Iwo Jima set and I believe the camoflauged HBT uniform is reversible.
all in action pics show the Marines' tanks driving buttoned up.
did Marines' doctrine dictate fighting with close hatches always?
this may affect my decision wether to include a tank crewman or an infantry figure (I dont want cluttered diorama, just a figure or two).
DML new set is NICE!!!! The only difference between Tarawa and Iwo would be Canteens. The covers had changed to the long cross flap type on Iwo. Also the Marines made it mandatory for all Marines to carry two canteens because of heat casualties in other battles. The Tarawa set does ignore the fact that the Marines wore Leggings. But these were some times discarded during the fight. I have both the Iwo and Tarawa sets and plan to mix and match.
The tankers fought buttoned up on Iwo, but there are plenty of pictures of crews riding around exposed on the island during the final stages of the battle when not engaged in combat. Your choice here depending on the action you want to portray. The tankers wore the same uniform as the rest of the Marines. One item that DML did not put on thier figures is the M1941 field jacket.
This is from the movie Flags of our fathers, Clint Eastwood is wearing the M1941 jacket.
Don
Drader
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 28, 2007 - 08:41 PM UTC
Quoted Text
The comment I made about different units and different time periods was for the Bison Decals.
The photo below shows M4A2's on Iwo Jima, even a camouflaged can be seen in the back ground. Only 3rd tank Bn had M4A2's on Iwo, so you can tell by the type of tank and the aircraft markings on these tanks that they are all from 3rd tank bn,
I beleive with just using the DML M4A2 Tarawa kit and the Bison decals of Apache you will have a 3rd Bn Iwo tank.
The only thing more that you need to find out is did the 3rd Bn add the armor plates to sides
To me it looks like there is a pale stripe on the hull side in exactly the place where the top edge of an applique armour panel would catch the light. The question then becomes is the applique from the standard uparmouring kit (which can be found in lots of Sherman models) or a field-produced one like the colour photos in my post up the thread.
David
gunnytank
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 28, 2007 - 09:57 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextThe comment I made about different units and different time periods was for the Bison Decals.
The photo below shows M4A2's on Iwo Jima, even a camouflaged can be seen in the back ground. Only 3rd tank Bn had M4A2's on Iwo, so you can tell by the type of tank and the aircraft markings on these tanks that they are all from 3rd tank bn,
I beleive with just using the DML M4A2 Tarawa kit and the Bison decals of Apache you will have a 3rd Bn Iwo tank.
The only thing more that you need to find out is did the 3rd Bn add the armor plates to sides
To me it looks like there is a pale stripe on the hull side in exactly the place where the top edge of an applique armour panel would catch the light. The question then becomes is the applique from the standard uparmouring kit (which can be found in lots of Sherman models) or a field-produced one like the colour photos in my post up the thread.
David
Is this the appliqué armor you where talking about? He’ll have to make them unless the DML kit comes with them. They look Field applied, and notice the first picture is Apache probably on Guam and the second is how she looked on Iwo. Guess this answers the question I had about the 3rd Bn adding the armor plates.
Thanks,
Don
Drader
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 28, 2007 - 10:29 PM UTC
Hi Don
From the sprue shots on PMMS the Dragon M4A2 mid production doesn't have any hull applique plates. As which sort to add, Apache definitely sports non-standard plates (and a great touch-up job around them too ). On the other hand the tank in the photo I copied in my post seems to have the top edge of the plate in about the right place for the plate supplied in the uparmouring kits (or added during remanufacture). Compare it with the applique armoured late M4A2s on Hard Corps to see what I mean. Tamiya's Shermans have the plates - even the M4A3 which shouldn't but Tamiya got confused with late production M4A2s too.
For some reason the second pic of Apache isn't showing for me.
David
From the sprue shots on PMMS the Dragon M4A2 mid production doesn't have any hull applique plates. As which sort to add, Apache definitely sports non-standard plates (and a great touch-up job around them too ). On the other hand the tank in the photo I copied in my post seems to have the top edge of the plate in about the right place for the plate supplied in the uparmouring kits (or added during remanufacture). Compare it with the applique armoured late M4A2s on Hard Corps to see what I mean. Tamiya's Shermans have the plates - even the M4A3 which shouldn't but Tamiya got confused with late production M4A2s too.
For some reason the second pic of Apache isn't showing for me.
David
gunnytank
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 28, 2007 - 11:39 PM UTC
I found this, another 3rd tank Bn tank
Don
Don
Drader
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 28, 2007 - 11:56 PM UTC
That's the 3rd Battalion tank that was in the back of my mind. Looks more like the standard applique (to me anyway) - and it appears to be applied to the RH turret-front too.
David
David
gunnytank
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 08:20 AM UTC
Quoted Text
That's the 3rd Battalion tank that was in the back of my mind. Looks more like the standard applique (to me anyway) - and it appears to be applied to the RH turret-front too.
David,
It might be a standard size, and shape, but I will almost guarantee you that the Marine Maintenance people installed them. C Co 3rd Tanks participated in the landings at Tarawa without them. That means 3rd tanks received their M4A2’s with out the appliqué armor. By Guam they had it on. I can’t find out where they refitted. While on Tarawa, Gilbert’s book says that their retrievers were at New Caledonia. Before Guam there is mention that A Co 3rd Tanks was assigned to the new 4th Marine regiment that was made up with Marines from the disbanded Raider Battalions on Guadalcanal. Anyway you see my point that the 3rd didn’t get new tanks from the states and they would have had to do it themselves.
Don
Elad
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 09:31 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I found this, another 3rd tank Bn tank
Don
same tank -
the applique armor does seem a bit larger than normal and the corners are sharp where the standard issue plates of the applique kit seem a bit round.
as opposed to the what David said I dont think it has the applique cheek armor on the RH side of the turret, just a discolouring or dust.
Don
regarding the jacket - from the picture of Clint Eastwood I'd say the M-1941 looks like the post war M-65 jacket but with 2 slash pockets instead of the 4 sewn over large ones.
how often did the infantry wear them during combat?
you mentioned tank crews wore same uniform as the infantry - did they wear leggings too? gloves? canteens? webbing maybe? holsters for the 0,45? did each crew member carry a sidearm? any chance they had a Thompson or an M3A1 Greasegun?
Elad
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 10:38 AM UTC
Quoted Text
DML new set is NICE!!!! The only difference between Tarawa and Iwo would be Canteens. The covers had changed to the long cross flap type on Iwo. Also the Marines made it mandatory for all Marines to carry two canteens because of heat casualties in other battles. The Tarawa set does ignore the fact that the Marines wore Leggings. But these were some times discarded during the fight. I have both the Iwo and Tarawa sets and plan to mix and match.
the DML Iwo set also has no Leggings.
I noticed the guy with the Garand in the Tarawa set doesnt have the bandolier like those worn by the guys behind Clint (I have a copy of the movie but havent watched it yet) and like the rifleman in DMLs marines Iwo Jima set.
did ammo pouches differ too between the Tarawa landings and the Iwo Jima ones?
gunnytank
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 11:33 AM UTC
Quoted Text
regarding the jacket - from the picture of Clint Eastwood I'd say the M-1941 looks like the post war M-65 jacket but with 2 slash pockets instead of the 4 sewn over large ones.
how often did the infantry wear them during combat?
you mentioned tank crews wore same uniform as the infantry - did they wear leggings too? gloves? canteens? webbing maybe? holsters for the 0,45? did each crew member carry a sidearm? any chance they had a Thompson or an M3A1 Greasegun?
M1941 is the same jacket the US Army started the war using, it is a just below the waist type. The M65 is longer and looks almost identical to the Army Late WW2 green field jacket M1943. A lot of people think that the M1941 was tan, or buff, or khaki. Go to this site:
http://www.atthefront.com/
I’ve seen one of these in person and the color tends to change with the light. Bright sun light makes it tanish and shade makes it greenish. As for wear, Iwo Jima is the only time I have seen Marines wear it in Combat. It was 19 February and it gets cold in the Pacific that far north.
This is a reproduction uniform maker site for re-enactors. Re-enactors are A LOT MORE PICKY about their uniforms being accurate than us model makers. This site has comments about color of the uniforms and equipment, with pictures. This section talks about the field gear with pictures of original USMC field gear.
http://www.atthefront.com/us_gear_usmc_about.htm
These are pictures showing that the Marines wore the M1941 jacket quite often on Iwo. Also note the two canteens with the cross flaps on them. Notice the leggings on almost all of them.
The tankers all hand M1911A1 .45 semi automatic pistols. Lots of photos I’ve seen some tankers with a Thompson SMG, but NO M3A1 grease gun (Marines didn’t get them in WW2), not sure we ever got them. Typical would be a crew of five would all have pistols with one Thompson or M1 carbine for the whole crew. Most of the web gear that tankers had stayed in the tank, notice this crew has no gear on..
And here is two tankers on Iwo;
I hope this helps,
Don
gunnytank
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 11:46 AM UTC
Quoted Text
the DML Iwo set also has no Leggings.
I noticed the guy with the Garand in the Tarawa set doesnt have the bandolier like those worn by the guys behind Clint (I have a copy of the movie but havent watched it yet) and like the rifleman in DMLs marines Iwo Jima set.
did ammo pouches differ too between the Tarawa landings and the Iwo Jima ones?
The Iwo set has two figures with leggings, the one with the shotgun and the one with M1 and ammo bandoleers. Their trousers are over them. The leggings went over the trousers and boots, but the trousers could be pulled out the top through activity or by the wearer if it got hot.
The ammo bandoleers are just cloth pouches with an M1 clip in each and a web strap. They came packaged in the ammo cans that way. Yes they would be the same as far as I know.
Don
Elad
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 12:08 PM UTC
thanks Don,
I cant stress enough how helpful is your knowledge in this subject.
I'll get the DML kit and Bison decals first and leave the figure choice for later when I have a rough idea of how I want the layout of the mini-dio to be.
thanks!
I cant stress enough how helpful is your knowledge in this subject.
I'll get the DML kit and Bison decals first and leave the figure choice for later when I have a rough idea of how I want the layout of the mini-dio to be.
thanks!
gunnytank
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 12:21 PM UTC
Keep me posted and if I can be of anymore help just send me a PM.
Don
P.S.- One of these days I want to build a Merkava, then I'll be on the asking end.
Don
P.S.- One of these days I want to build a Merkava, then I'll be on the asking end.
Elad
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 05:54 PM UTC
I know my stuff when it comes to the Merkava series, may even make a model builder oriented PDF to sort out all the little details and all those myths that surrond the tank among foreign modelers.
I placed an order with LuckyModel for the DML kit and the Bison decals, should be here in a week+.
I placed an order with LuckyModel for the DML kit and the Bison decals, should be here in a week+.
Drader
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 08:45 PM UTC
Quoted Text
David,
It might be a standard size, and shape, but I will almost guarantee you that the Marine Maintenance people installed them. C Co 3rd Tanks participated in the landings at Tarawa without them. That means 3rd tanks received their M4A2’s with out the appliqué armor. By Guam they had it on. I can’t find out where they refitted. While on Tarawa, Gilbert’s book says that their retrievers were at New Caledonia. Before Guam there is mention that A Co 3rd Tanks was assigned to the new 4th Marine regiment that was made up with Marines from the disbanded Raider Battalions on Guadalcanal. Anyway you see my point that the 3rd didn’t get new tanks from the states and they would have had to do it themselves.
Don
Hi Don
No argument with you about the likelihood that the applique was installed by Marine Maintenance. Applique kits were issued by Ordnance for adding to tanks at depot or unit level, as well as supplied to factories for adding to remanufactured tanks.
On the subject of turret applique, the first thing to catch my eye in the second photo was a hard black shadow along the lower edge of the turret. At first I thought this indicated thickened cheek armour, but then I saw what looked like the top edge of an applique plate. Really need a better (larger) version of the photo to be sure. I'll have a look this weekend in the old Tanks Illustrated US Marine Tanks in World War Two as well as the Concord book and see if anything turns up.
David
Drader
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 08:56 PM UTC
gunnytank
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 03:26 AM UTC
David,
Dave Harper is the guy at HardCorps Models that helped me out with my Iwo Jima Flame Tank. He told me that he will have a book out in December. I told him that I wanted to be the first to buy it.
If you go buy what formations models say about their Mid production turret, single hatch, it says it has the cheek armor. I am going to by Hunnicut Sherman book one of these days in order to figure out what versions had what. The cheek armor was added because a new fire control system was installed and the turret armor had to be thinned on the inside of the turret. The solution was to add armor on the out side. If this tank had the welded on cheek armor it would be the only USMC tank that I have seen with it.
Don
Dave Harper is the guy at HardCorps Models that helped me out with my Iwo Jima Flame Tank. He told me that he will have a book out in December. I told him that I wanted to be the first to buy it.
If you go buy what formations models say about their Mid production turret, single hatch, it says it has the cheek armor. I am going to by Hunnicut Sherman book one of these days in order to figure out what versions had what. The cheek armor was added because a new fire control system was installed and the turret armor had to be thinned on the inside of the turret. The solution was to add armor on the out side. If this tank had the welded on cheek armor it would be the only USMC tank that I have seen with it.
Don
Drader
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 03:33 AM UTC
Hi Don
I've got Hunnicutt and I'm still confused.
David
I've got Hunnicutt and I'm still confused.
David
Drader
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Monday, November 05, 2007 - 02:05 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I found this, another 3rd tank Bn tank
Don
Okay, now I've studied a decent resolution print of this photo in Concord's book on tank warfare in the Pacific, I'm convinced that this tank has the applique armour panels on the turret cheek (even the seam between the two plates is visible). Not only that, but the two tanks following also have a full set of hull and turret applique panels - obviously recently added as the paint doesn't match the rest of the tank.
Looking through Steve Zaloga's US Marine tanks in World War 2 I found another couple of cases of the use of turret applique, though the quality of the photos isn't so good. The probable is a tank of 4th Tank Battalion on Saipan (photo 67). Much more definite is Photo 78 of a tank from the 4th Separate Tank Company on Guam. Both of the photos were apparently taken in July 1944. All of the date/location/unit info is taken from the photo captions and may be subject to error of course.
The same book has a couple of the 3rd Battalions tanks also on Guam which have either no applique or the home-made type like that on Apache.
David
Elad
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 11, 2007 - 02:29 AM UTC
just got home back from the post office with the kit and decals.
not a big surprise but there are no applique armor parts in kit so these would have to be fashioned from sheet plastic.
the decals are a bit of a "good, bad, ugly" affair-
the good - decals arent part of hugh decal film sheet but the carrier film is only about 1-0.5mm wider than the print thus no careful trimming is required. not a big deal but a nice touch that reduces the risk of trimming to much.
the bad - as I suspected the tanks with camo paintjob are only depicted in side view leaving the builder guessing whats going on the other sides.
the ugly - the carrier film seems to be yellow tinted, how is that going to affect the look of the decals over the finished model? I don't know but I will do a test run on a scrap model first.
not a big surprise but there are no applique armor parts in kit so these would have to be fashioned from sheet plastic.
the decals are a bit of a "good, bad, ugly" affair-
the good - decals arent part of hugh decal film sheet but the carrier film is only about 1-0.5mm wider than the print thus no careful trimming is required. not a big deal but a nice touch that reduces the risk of trimming to much.
the bad - as I suspected the tanks with camo paintjob are only depicted in side view leaving the builder guessing whats going on the other sides.
the ugly - the carrier film seems to be yellow tinted, how is that going to affect the look of the decals over the finished model? I don't know but I will do a test run on a scrap model first.