_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Allied - WWII
Armor and ground forces of the Allied forces during World War II.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Iwo Jima Sherman
Elad
Visit this Community
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 - 12:29 PM UTC
hey,

what is the best kit to start with for a Iwo Jima Sherman?

did the marines use M4A2s, A3s or both?
what about the flame throwing Shermans? same case as the gun tank version?

thanks.
gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 - 01:34 PM UTC

Quoted Text

hey,

what is the best kit to start with for a Iwo Jima Sherman?

did the marines use M4A2s, A3s or both?
what about the flame throwing Shermans? same case as the gun tank version?

thanks.


I just finished a Iwo Jima M4A3 flame tank last month and had to go through all the learning curves. I used Italeri U.S. Marines M4 Sherman, you can make it an M4A2 or M4A3. I still did a lot of changes to the model read the following post:
https://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/106843#881450
These are reviews of two kits, they both have problems making them accurate:
http://www.perthmilitarymodelling.com/reviews/vehicles/academy/acd13203.htm
http://www.perthmilitarymodelling.com/reviews/vehicles/italeri/it6389.htm
The Marine 4th and 5th Tank Battalions on Iwo Jima used M4A3’s while the 3rd used M4A2’s. Research the Tank you want to do because I found out that they were all different in one way or another. There were different types of flame tanks on Iwo Jima also. They had the ones with the bow machinegun replaced with a flamethrower and the version I modeled. Only eight M4A3’s were modified with the Mark 1 Navy flame throwers, four went to the 4th Tank Bn, and four went to the 5th Tank Bn. If you have anymore questions I will be glad to save you the miseries I went through.
Don
Elad
Visit this Community
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 - 06:23 PM UTC
thanks Don, I'll read it thoroughly in the evening.

I was hoping to use a DML kit because I need an excuse to build one of their modern kits and because the PE goodies will keep the aftermarket beast at bay

for some reason DML has no 75mm M4A3 and their A2 has the early turret with no loader's hatch which I'm not sure is correct.

what references did you use?


gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 25, 2007 - 02:20 AM UTC

Quoted Text


for some reason DML has no 75mm M4A3 and their A2 has the early turret with no loader's hatch which I'm not sure is correct.

what references did you use?



I used "Marine tanks battles in the Pacific", the web, this site, and HardCorps models helped me. It drove me crazy trying to find out which tanks were the flame tank M4A3's on Iwo. The only one I ever found a photo of shooting flame was "COED". DML's M4A2 is accurate for Tarawa. I would have to check and see if the 3rd tank Bn's M4A3 were 47degree hulls with only a one hatch turret. I picked a Tank then modeled it, not picked a model then see if I could find out if they used it. You pick a tank, and I can help you with what modifications you would have to do for each kit. Like I said before the Italeri kit makes both the M4A3 and M4A2, the deep water fording stacks, wood sides (I really didn't like these) and correct turret. Bad thing is that it has the T-54E1 steel chevron track, BUT NO DUCK BILLED end connectors. I used the Old Tamiya M4A3 track. These are the things you can look for once you pick which tank you want to build.
If you want a kit that will build an Iwo Jima Tank OOB, not happening.
Don
Elad
Visit this Community
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 25, 2007 - 07:18 AM UTC
well, if thats the situation then a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do - I'll merge the DML A2 with Italeri's A3 turret and wading gear and add AFV Club tracks with duckbill...

whats your take on it? anything else I may need?
gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 25, 2007 - 01:40 PM UTC

Quoted Text

well, if thats the situation then a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do - I'll merge the DML A2 with Italeri's A3 turret and wading gear and add AFV Club tracks with duckbill...

whats your take on it? anything else I may need?


3rd Tank Bn M4A2 Iwo, notice aircraft stye markings

4th Tank Bn M4A3 Iwo, notice wood sides, cages on hatches, spare track on turret and front slope, 47 degree hull front and large hatches

This M4A3 "Doris" is a 4th Tank Bn tank, Academy kit has decals for it, but they have it has an M4A2, Wrong. The 4th and 5th Tank Bn's had just been completely re-equiped with M4A3's before the battle.

On this M4A3 you can see the T-54E1 tracks with duck bills.

Late Production M4A2 on Peleliu


DML M4A2 Tarawa has the 56 degree hull, wrong for Iwo.

If you have to have a DML hull, look at this one, 6255 M4A3 (76)W VVSS Sherman Battle of the Bulge. Here is a review:
http://www.dragonmodelsltd.com/html/6255-cookie-reviews.htm
It is an M4A3 with right hull, and comes with duckbill end connectors. This is important because the Academy comes with T48 Rubber Block track with duckbill end connectors. The Italeri kit has T-54E1 but no duckbills. AFV Club doesn’t make T54E1 tracks. Model Kasten does, 1/35 MKSSK45 Sherman T54E1 Steel Chevron Workable Track Set, but no duck bills.
T54E1 Track

The British steel chevron track looks like T54E1 with 3 round bolt heads. With the DML M4A3 you get both the British steel and the T48. You can cut or file these bolts off the tracks and add the duckbills to have a convincing T54E1 with duckbills. However the review on this kit says the tracks are hard to put together, I have only built the Italeri so decide on the other kits carefully.
That will take care of hull and track.
Turret
Buy either the Italeri or Academy kit. You will need the turret plus you get the fording stacks. The Italeri has the mountings for both M4A2 and M4A3 versions.
Wood side armor and other things can be discussed later. If you get one of these kits, then you will really only need the T54E1 track to make it an Iwo tank. So why buy the DML.
Don
Elad
Visit this Community
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 12:35 AM UTC
Don, thanks for the comprehensive reply! great pics too.
from your reply I take it that no early M4A2s were present on Iwo and that the late A2 differes from the A3 by the engine deck only (meaning it has the same front hull as the A3 with out the earlier versions direct vision blocks and the 56 degree slope), is that correct?

I may be better off just getting the Italeri kit then with aftermarket tracks and a basic PE set for headlight guards (and periscope guards if the specific tank I choose to model has them).

btw, what did you use for the side armor wood planks? plain 2 mm RC builders balsa? what did you use for painting and finishing it?
marcb
Visit this Community
Overijssel, Netherlands
Joined: March 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,244 posts
Armorama: 1,226 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 12:47 AM UTC
I'd go for the italeri Marines Sherman, as mentioned above, and the following:
- Formations wheels: F043 Late Welded Sherman Wheels (Jumbo Wheels)
- Bison decals: BD-35035 USMC SHERMANS - WW2 and Korea.
- steel chevron tracks with extended end connectors
- hull wood/ concrete armor, see Hardcorps models site for reference pics (Italeri kit only offers the wood outer planking)
- replace kit .50 mg with fe one from the Academy mg set

Hope this helps.

gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 02:00 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Don, thanks for the comprehensive reply! great pics too.
from your reply I take it that no early M4A2s were present on Iwo and that the late A2 differes from the A3 by the engine deck only (meaning it has the same front hull as the A3 with out the earlier versions direct vision blocks and the 56 degree slope), is that correct?

I may be better off just getting the Italeri kit then with aftermarket tracks and a basic PE set for headlight guards (and periscope guards if the specific tank I choose to model has them).

btw, what did you use for the side armor wood planks? plain 2 mm RC builders balsa? what did you use for painting and finishing it?


You are right about the A2 and A3, differences are the engine deck and rear exhaust and door panel. If you leave the rear fording stack base on you can't see the rear exhaust and engine door. This has been part of the reason that a lot of tanks on Iwo were miss indentified as M4A2's. The sand bags on the engine decks hid the last feature to tell the two types apart.
If you go back through the tread I posted:
https://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/106843#881450
I put a list of changes I made to this model. I was not very familiar with Shermans when I started this build. I learned that the turret should have extra armor thickness called cheek armor. Here is an after market turret that fixes this problem. Other wise you can use putty to thicken the area as I did.

The wood is balsa wood that is scribe down the middle to appear to be two different boards.
I made my hatch cages with plastic window screen. There are after market kits for these as well.
Don
gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 02:13 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I'd go for the italeri Marines Sherman, as mentioned above, and the following:
- Formations wheels: F043 Late Welded Sherman Wheels (Jumbo Wheels)
- Bison decals: BD-35035 USMC SHERMANS - WW2 and Korea.
- steel chevron tracks with extended end connectors
- hull wood/ concrete armor, see Hardcorps models site for reference pics (Italeri kit only offers the wood outer planking)
- replace kit .50 mg with fe one from the Academy mg set
Hope this helps.


- The wheels in this kit are fine, Buy Formation turret instead.
- I looked at Bison, don't know about quality, but they do look accurate.
- I'm still trying to figure out where to get T54E1 w/duckbills. I took mine off OLD Tamiya M4A3 setting in my display shelf. Tamiya's new kits don't have them, I looked.
- Balsa wood with Granite bolts is what I used.
- Don't bother with the .50 cal., almost all .50 cal MG's that came with the tanks were given to the infantry units in the Marines. Marines figured out real quick that firing a .50 on top of a tank in the Pacific is not real smart. In all the pictures of Iwo tanks there are no .50 cal MG's.
Don
Drader
Visit this Community
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 02:34 AM UTC
The second pair of photos on this page from Hard Corps Models show a mid-production M4A2 captioned as being on Iwo Jima, reading Ed Gilbert's old postings on Missing Links I also got the impression that the 3rd Battalions tanks were mid-production (as in Dragon's Tarawa M4A2) and not late production (as in Academy/Italeri)

http://www.hardcorpsmodels.com/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=17&Itemid=28

The tank also has home made applique armour, applique also appears on the late-production M4A2 (75) as these still have dry ammunition stowage, unlike the late M4A3 (75)

David
gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 03:45 AM UTC

Quoted Text

The second pair of photos on this page from Hard Corps Models show a mid-production M4A2 captioned as being on Iwo Jima, reading Ed Gilbert's old postings on Missing Links I also got the impression that the 3rd Battalions tanks were mid-production (as in Dragon's Tarawa M4A2) and not late production (as in Academy/Italeri)


You are right I stand corrected, here is a 3rd tank Bn pic:

I got the version of M4A2 wrong for the 3rd tank Bn, but they where the only Bn on Iwo with M4A2's. Zagola came out with a book years ago that said that only the flame tanks on Iwo where M4A3's, all other tanks on Iwo where M4A2's. This has been proven WRONG. Ed Gilbert's book, the Marine Corps Tanker Association, HardCorps models, and a number of other documents I read all state that the 4th and 5th tank Bn's had been COMPLETELY re-equiped with M4A3's.
So, DML will work for 3rd tank Bn Iwo tank. Good to know.


Elad
Visit this Community
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 06:46 AM UTC
Don,

this photo is very intresting, that particular Sherman clearly has the distinctive welded hull front of the A2 and no duckbill. add the aircraft style star and bar marking and you got an Iwo example that I'm very tempted to model but there are a couple of issues though:
-lack of reference, I doubt I could find enough pics of this tank to do the subject any justice
-I still believe the mid production A2s on Iwo Jima had a loader's hatch which DML's early turret lacks.
-the tank clearly has no wading gear or duckbills so I guess it didnt participate in landing operations at all.
-lack of wood planking, sandbags, nets over the hatches and the presence of the split TC hatch makes me suspect that it is not an Iwo Jima machine at all. also notice the writing on the side - looks like it says Dora which I believe is a D company machine from the Tarawa landings. D Co. tanks also had these aircraft markings.

what do you guys think?

edit: I noticed this M4A2 has the antena on the fron hull ant. mount. does that makes it the CO comander's mount?
gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 07:36 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Don,

this photo is very intresting, that particular Sherman clearly has the distinctive welded hull front of the A2 and no duckbill. add the aircraft style star and bar marking and you got an Iwo example that I'm very tempted to model but there are a couple of issues though:
-lack of reference, I doubt I could find enough pics of this tank to do the subject any justice
-I still believe the mid production A2s on Iwo Jima had a loader's hatch which DML's early turret lacks.
-the tank clearly has no wading gear or duckbills so I guess it didnt participate in landing operations at all.
-lack of wood planking, sandbags, nets over the hatches and the presence of the split TC hatch makes me suspect that it is not an Iwo Jima machine at all. also notice the writing on the side - looks like it says Dora which I believe is a D company machine from the Tarawa landings. D Co. tanks also had these aircraft markings.

what do you guys think?

edit: I noticed this M4A2 has the antena on the fron hull ant. mount. does that makes it the CO comander's mount?


I'll check my reference books when I get home. Most of the research I did was on the 4th and 5th Bn because I wanted a camouflaged sherman. The few pics that I've seen of the 3rd Bn tanks on Iwo, I thought they were all green. I did read that one of the things that the Marines didn't like about the M4A3 was that they couldn't fit into the landing craft like the M4A2's could. The A3's had to come in on the LST's. This could be why this vehicle does not have fording gear on, another reason is a lot of crews removed them while they were there. The Battle lasted over a month. I do believe this is Iwo, you can see a cammie tank in the background. The 4th sailed to Iwo from Muai, 5th from Hawaii, thats why they had A3's. The 3rd sailed from Guam. This is why the 4th and 5th had wood side armor, cages or nails on hatches, water cans on the rear decks, as well as other modifications. Tarawa was C company, cuddles, colorado, etc... But again would have to verify no D Co. The aircraft stlye markings are a dead give away that this is 3rd Bn, they were the only ones to use it. Mutiple antenna tanks were prime targets for the japanese. I guess this would be a command tank, Pltoon commander or CO/XO of company. I will look some more to find out what I can, BUT Remember what I said at first, PICK THE ONE YOU WANT to build, then we can talk about which model would be best.
Don
gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 08:36 AM UTC
Here are some other Iwo Tanks







Don
Elad
Visit this Community
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 11:44 AM UTC
I guess I'll have to stick with a 3rd bn. tank because I can have an OOTB build of DMLs kit (however I'm still pretty sure I'll need a Formations turret). I would have went M4A3 but really cant find a set of T54E1 tracks.

the problem is finding multiple photos of a 3rd battalion M4A2. if anyone knows where I can get these please tell me.
gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 12:55 PM UTC
Ok, I’ve looked at some references and it looks as if the 3rd Tank Bn still had same tanks that C Co used on Tarawa, single hatch turret and all. The two photos I have posted in this tread are 3rd tank Bn tanks on Iwo. This is a link to the Break down of what’s in the DML M4A2 kit,
http://www.dragonmodelsltd.com/html/6062p1.htm
In the pictures I can’t tell if the additional armor that was put on dry storage tanks has been put on by Iwo or not. Bison decals for USMC Shermans has a M4A2, 3rd tank Bn, Iwo Jima, it’s even camouflaged. I have never tried their decals but judging from comparing their decals to photos they are accurate. It will also come with a guide to paint the tank.
http://www.angelfire.com/pro/bison/35035.html

This looks like all you need to get a Iwo Jima tank. One kit and one set of decals. Sounds too simple, I may try it myself.
Don
gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 01:25 PM UTC
Here is why no duckbill on M4A2's:
This is a quote from Ed Gilbert's "Marine tank battles in the Pacific":

Quoted Text

The new M4A3 shermans were wider and heavier than the old M4A2's, and the lighter LCM's could neither carry them nor be expected to survive in Iwo's heavy surf. Most of the tanks of the 4th and 5th tank bn's where loaded into LSM's. The sea going landing ship, medium could embark five sherman tanks (the usual load was three) and did not require an LSD as a mother ship. The 3rd tank Bn was loaded aboard three of the precious LST's.


So it looks like no tanks went to shore at Iwo in "Mike boats" (LCM's).
Don
Elad
Visit this Community
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 01:29 PM UTC
are you refering to the mid production tank carrying the writing - Apache?
if so then I still need the rear wading trunk and duckbill tracks to make it.

to make things more complicated Bison mentions the tank is from an unidentified unit but it is an A2, has the aricraft style markings and has an "8" marking on the back of the wading trunk like the first picture you brought here of a 3rd battalion tank -

in the picture the tank has a low bustle turret and no spare track link holders at the back so it does seem like a mid production A2 or at least one that has some mid production cahractristics (but you can never be sure with Shermans....its even less systematic than german armor).

RHPS made duckbill tracks but it seems they are out of business. I'll try to find a new-old stock set or Ebay one.
about cheek armor...I'll have to guess here...
gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 02:02 PM UTC

Quoted Text

are you refering to the mid production tank carrying the writing - Apache?
if so then I still need the rear wading trunk and duckbill tracks to make it.

to make things more complicated Bison mentions the tank is from an unidentified unit but it is an A2, has the aricraft style markings and has an "8" marking on the back of the wading trunk like the first picture you brought here of a 3rd battalion tank -

in the picture the tank has a low bustle turret and no spare track link holders at the back so it does seem like a mid production A2 or at least one that has some mid production cahractristics (but you can never be sure with Shermans....its even less systematic than german armor).

RHPS made duckbill tracks but it seems they are out of business. I'll try to find a new-old stock set or Ebay one.
about cheek armor...I'll have to guess here...


Apache - Yes, use the decals and paint scheme, I thought it was like this other pic, 56 degree hull with single hatch turret. I think the cheek armor came on later turrets so the DML kit should work, it also has T54E1 without duckbills, Like the picture.

None of these tanks look like they have fording gear, remember 3rd tanks came off LST's they may not have used it or were told to take it off by this point in the battle. The only thing I can't tell by this pic is if they had the add on armor plates on the hull.
Don
Elad
Visit this Community
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 02:13 PM UTC
the Bison diagram of Apache has no standoff wood plankning armor but it has the extra steel plates welded armor where the magazines are. the pic of the A2 numbered 62 also seems to have them and so do the rest of the tanks in the picture (but its hard to determine wether they are of the same unit or maybe even A3s.

one more question - isn't Apache supposed to belong to A company or there is no rule of thumb that first letter denotes company?
gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 02:37 PM UTC
This is turret for DML, low bustle, single hatch, looks like the pic to me

If you have to have the fording gear Tankworkshop makes a set, here is a reveiw:
http://www.amps-armor.org/ampssite/reviews/showReview.aspx?ID=125&Type=FL

If someone knows if this turret needs the cheek armor added please let us know.
Don
gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 02:46 PM UTC

Quoted Text

the Bison diagram of Apache has no standoff wood plankning armor but it has the extra steel plates welded armor where the magazines are. the pic of the A2 numbered 62 also seems to have them and so do the rest of the tanks in the picture (but its hard to determine wether they are of the same unit or maybe even A3s.

one more question - isn't Apache supposed to belong to A company or there is no rule of thumb that first letter denotes company?


They are different units and time periods. Apache is the only one that is 3rd tanks Iwo Jima. The others are 56 degree hull (late) M4A2's and M4A3's. There is even one M4A3 Hvss105mm dozer tank in Korea.
Yes, if the name of the tank starts with A it's A Company Tank.
3rd tanks used no wood armor, extra steel plates are protection of dry storage shermans. My advice is find a better picture of a 3rd Bn tank to see if they used the plates or not.
Don
Elad
Visit this Community
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Joined: June 19, 2004
KitMaker: 458 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 11:04 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

the Bison diagram of Apache has no standoff wood plankning armor but it has the extra steel plates welded armor where the magazines are. the pic of the A2 numbered 62 also seems to have them and so do the rest of the tanks in the picture (but its hard to determine wether they are of the same unit or maybe even A3s.

one more question - isn't Apache supposed to belong to A company or there is no rule of thumb that first letter denotes company?


They are different units and time periods. Apache is the only one that is 3rd tanks Iwo Jima. The others are 56 degree hull (late) M4A2's and M4A3's. There is even one M4A3 Hvss105mm dozer tank in Korea.
Yes, if the name of the tank starts with A it's A Company Tank.
3rd tanks used no wood armor, extra steel plates are protection of dry storage shermans. My advice is find a better picture of a 3rd Bn tank to see if they used the plates or not.
Don



I think there was a misunderstanding, I was refering to the pic you uploaded -


I was saying that all tanks in the picture have the dry stowage hull armor just like Apache and are clearly M4A2 mid production with low bustle turret.
gunnytank
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 24, 2006
KitMaker: 205 posts
Armorama: 200 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 27, 2007 - 05:38 AM UTC
The comment I made about different units and different time periods was for the Bison Decals.

The photo below shows M4A2's on Iwo Jima, even a camouflaged can be seen in the back ground. Only 3rd tank Bn had M4A2's on Iwo, so you can tell by the type of tank and the aircraft markings on these tanks that they are all from 3rd tank bn,


I beleive with just using the DML M4A2 Tarawa kit and the Bison decals of Apache you will have a 3rd Bn Iwo tank.
The only thing more that you need to find out is did the 3rd Bn add the armor plates to sides like this picture:

Those armor plate are easy to add with sheet plastic.
The photo shows no fording gear on the tanks, but if you want it you can either scratch build it or buy the Tankworkshop's deep wading kit for M4A2's.
Again, it is up to you, what you wish to build. Now you know why I said to pick the tank first and then pick the kit or kits to build it.
Don
 _GOTOTOP