Hosted by Darren Baker
Sword june 6, 1944 10:00 AM near WN18

Navy95

Joined: October 03, 2008
KitMaker: 174 posts
Armorama: 173 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 - 10:56 PM UTC
.... while a soldier from Commando Kieffer is carefully coming closer to the destroyed porthole of the H612 bunker flanking Colleville beach toward Hermanville, a grunt of East Yorkshire regiment - 3rd British Infantry division, is trying, despite the hubbub of the battle, to point out a new target to the tank commander of a Churchill Mk IV AVRE, 5th Assault Regiment Royal Engineer

jimbrae

Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 - 11:12 PM UTC
Really excellent work - thanks for sharing it!
In reference to Commando Kieffer:

In reference to Commando Kieffer:




thomokiwi

Joined: January 11, 2006
KitMaker: 438 posts
Armorama: 359 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 - 11:14 PM UTC
Excellent Diorama, I particularly like your bunker and the Commando. Were did you source your figures form.
Posted: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 - 11:19 PM UTC
Hi Yvan,
Nice work, very good representation of the bunker. Just one thought should the AVRE not have wading stacks?
Excellent stuff.
Al
Nice work, very good representation of the bunker. Just one thought should the AVRE not have wading stacks?
Excellent stuff.
Al

Navy95

Joined: October 03, 2008
KitMaker: 174 posts
Armorama: 173 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 - 11:20 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Excellent Diorama, I particularly like your bunker and the Commando. Were did you source your figures form.
Thks !
The Commando is a limited resin edition figure that came with the subscription to french modeling magazine Steel Master
( maybe it was also available in the past as well from Nemrod ?

The tank commander and the grunt are both the Tamiya plastic figures ( slightly modified arms position ) that come with the Churchill kit, and with Hornet heads

Navy95

Joined: October 03, 2008
KitMaker: 174 posts
Armorama: 173 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 - 11:22 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Hi Yvan,
Nice work, very good representation of the bunker. Just one thought should the AVRE not have wading stacks?
Excellent stuff.
Al
According to the pictures available, not all of them were equiped with wading stacks, probably depending on when they landed ( 1st wave or later on )


Drader

Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 - 11:22 PM UTC
Nice work - is that the same Vickers K gunner who was later photographed cadging a light for his cigarette from some civilians?
David
David

Navy95

Joined: October 03, 2008
KitMaker: 174 posts
Armorama: 173 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 - 11:31 PM UTC
2 pictures of the real H612 bunker a few hours or days after D-Day

regarding the wading stacks, for ex. this one don't have


regarding the wading stacks, for ex. this one don't have


Drader

Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 - 11:43 PM UTC
The BARV behind the AVRE in your picture looks interesting - is the darker surround to the star the result of a repaint or cleaning?
David
David
spitfire303

Joined: December 22, 2006
KitMaker: 1,437 posts
Armorama: 1,406 posts

Posted: Thursday, October 16, 2008 - 01:01 AM UTC
that's an excellent work! The painting job is really outstanding.
spit
spit

HONEYCUT

Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts

Posted: Thursday, October 16, 2008 - 01:24 AM UTC
Gday Yvan
That is tremendous work mate.
A really different scene, which is great
The details are super, as is the figure painting.
A couple of minor things would be to add a wash to the tank commanders hands or deepen/remove the grooves between the fingers? Also the actual bunker looks a little too clean, even though the archive photo suggests it. Very minor things as I said...
Great stuff
Brad
That is tremendous work mate.
A really different scene, which is great

The details are super, as is the figure painting.
A couple of minor things would be to add a wash to the tank commanders hands or deepen/remove the grooves between the fingers? Also the actual bunker looks a little too clean, even though the archive photo suggests it. Very minor things as I said...
Great stuff
Brad


youngc

Joined: June 05, 2007
KitMaker: 2,166 posts
Armorama: 1,080 posts

Posted: Thursday, October 16, 2008 - 01:47 AM UTC
Very nice diorama,
The gunner must have been very accurate to get so many hits in one small area and avoid hitting the oblique wall!
Nicely painted figures also.
Chas
The gunner must have been very accurate to get so many hits in one small area and avoid hitting the oblique wall!
Nicely painted figures also.
Chas

Navy95

Joined: October 03, 2008
KitMaker: 174 posts
Armorama: 173 posts

Posted: Thursday, October 16, 2008 - 02:03 AM UTC
Tks all for your comments !
these are not impacts all those holes, but actualy holes made when building the bunker to create a kind of camo by trying to "break" the typical aspect of a bunker
the oblic wall indeed cannot be hit anyhow, because it's facing the opposite side ( on the 2nd picture, the beach is on the left )
the H612 bunker is a flanking casemate, with porthole axis more or less paralele to be the beach
Here is as well a picture from 1944

these are not impacts all those holes, but actualy holes made when building the bunker to create a kind of camo by trying to "break" the typical aspect of a bunker
the oblic wall indeed cannot be hit anyhow, because it's facing the opposite side ( on the 2nd picture, the beach is on the left )
the H612 bunker is a flanking casemate, with porthole axis more or less paralele to be the beach
Here is as well a picture from 1944



youngc

Joined: June 05, 2007
KitMaker: 2,166 posts
Armorama: 1,080 posts

Posted: Thursday, October 16, 2008 - 02:15 AM UTC
Quoted Text
these are not impacts all those holes, but actualy holes made when building the bunker to create a kind of camo by trying to "break" the typical aspect of a bunker
the oblic wall indeed cannot be hit anyhow, because it's facing the opposite side ( on the 2nd picture, the beach is on the left )
the H612 bunker is a flanking casemate, with porthole axis more or less paralele to be the beach
You learn something new everyday

Good on ya mate.
Chas

210cav

Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 6,149 posts
Armorama: 4,573 posts

Posted: Thursday, October 16, 2008 - 03:26 AM UTC
Great job on a well deserved subject area. I really like the way you weathered the vehicle and painted the bunker. Good job!

jjumbo

Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts

Posted: Thursday, October 16, 2008 - 04:36 AM UTC
Excellent work Yvan !
Great looking diorama !!
Your photo-shopped B/W pic looks like the real thing !!!
Cheers
jjumbo
Great looking diorama !!
Your photo-shopped B/W pic looks like the real thing !!!
Cheers



jjumbo


chicane

Joined: March 25, 2008
KitMaker: 201 posts
Armorama: 161 posts

Posted: Thursday, October 16, 2008 - 07:19 AM UTC
great diorama like the figures alot . nice history backround to your diorama



Navy95

Joined: October 03, 2008
KitMaker: 174 posts
Armorama: 173 posts

Posted: Thursday, October 16, 2008 - 11:27 AM UTC
Thank you very much for your comments





sparky

Joined: December 26, 2004
KitMaker: 128 posts
Armorama: 105 posts

Posted: Thursday, October 16, 2008 - 12:42 PM UTC
WOW
Great job Yvan!
Great job Yvan!

Jamesite

Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts

Posted: Friday, October 17, 2008 - 01:00 AM UTC
Really good job,
your churchill is great and you've really re-created the damaged bunker very well, also nice work on the old Tamiya figs, although in the 'hubbub of battle' I doubt the commander would be so far out of his hatch. Also i'd suggest that the pointing tommy may have been better posed to be making eye contact with the commander to give a better idea of their interaction.
These are minor points though, a great scene, well done.
James
your churchill is great and you've really re-created the damaged bunker very well, also nice work on the old Tamiya figs, although in the 'hubbub of battle' I doubt the commander would be so far out of his hatch. Also i'd suggest that the pointing tommy may have been better posed to be making eye contact with the commander to give a better idea of their interaction.
These are minor points though, a great scene, well done.
James

Posted: Friday, October 17, 2008 - 01:57 AM UTC
Excellent work Yvan, especially on the bunker. My first impression of the bunker exterior was similar to others here, thinking something was not quite right. Thanks for the pictures and explanation. Shows us all how that there is never a 'definitive' right or wrong when it comes to modelling 60+ year old reality....
Henk

Henk

Romeo12

Joined: July 14, 2004
KitMaker: 79 posts
Armorama: 52 posts

Posted: Friday, October 17, 2008 - 02:16 AM UTC
OUTSTANDING ! I like the way everything seems flow together in it. It all just fits together and you've captured the realism to a tee IMHO.Very well done sir!


mattjack

Joined: July 05, 2007
KitMaker: 137 posts
Armorama: 109 posts

Posted: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 - 09:39 AM UTC
![]() |