_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Vietnam
All things Vietnam
Hosted by Darren Baker
M60 AVLB
Thomas_
Visit this Community
Aargau, Switzerland
Joined: January 10, 2006
KitMaker: 63 posts
Armorama: 57 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 22, 2008 - 11:51 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I've got a question for you. Why do you have this marked as a build log? You have no pictures of a build.



It was a mistake, but solved now.
newfish
Visit this Community
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 2,329 posts
Armorama: 2,110 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2008 - 02:45 AM UTC
alright mate =] are you going to build the kit =]
because hbobby fan do the conversion or the whole kit


cheers =]

Thomas_
Visit this Community
Aargau, Switzerland
Joined: January 10, 2006
KitMaker: 63 posts
Armorama: 57 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2008 - 07:26 AM UTC
yes, I will do it

the hf is a M48 AVLB, I guess.

M48 AVLB ARMORED VEHICLE LAUNCHED BRIDGE
HF018
LeoCmdr
Visit this Community
Alberta, Canada
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 4,085 posts
Armorama: 3,917 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2008 - 08:14 AM UTC
The Hobby Fan kit is very nice.....an M48A5 AVLB.

There has been comments based upon measurement comparisons that the bridge deck is too narrow........close enough for me.....the kit is very well detailed.

It needs some minor upgrades to bring it up the last version used.
Anmoga
Visit this Community
Spain / España
Joined: November 18, 2004
KitMaker: 456 posts
Armorama: 333 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2008 - 08:52 PM UTC
Hi Jason,

Could you give me the link to the comparison article? I have the HobbyFan kit and would be interested in correcting it.

Thanks in advance,
Angel
HeavyArty
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2008 - 09:09 PM UTC

Quoted Text

The Hobby Fan kit is very nice.....an M48A5 AVLB... It needs some minor upgrades to bring it up the last version used.



Like an entirely new hull, running gear, tracks, etc. The M60 AVLB uses an M60 hull. The M48 AVLB was replaced w/M60AVLBs in the late 70's.
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Monday, November 24, 2008 - 01:09 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

The Hobby Fan kit is very nice.....an M48A5 AVLB... It needs some minor upgrades to bring it up the last version used.



Like an entirely new hull, running gear, tracks, etc. The M60 AVLB uses an M60 hull. The M48 AVLB was replaced w/M60AVLBs in the late 70's.

The M48 AVLB was used well into the 1980s, as late as 1988. Late M48 AVLBs used the same tracks as late M60 series vehicles.
Removed by original poster on 11/24/08 - 13:32:46 (GMT).
HeavyArty
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Monday, November 24, 2008 - 01:28 AM UTC
Ok, so they were used a little longer. Still not the same hull though. It will require a quite a bit more than "minor upgrades to bring it up the last version used."
Kenaicop
#384
Visit this Community
Nevada, United States
Joined: August 23, 2005
KitMaker: 1,426 posts
Armorama: 1,316 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 28, 2008 - 10:13 AM UTC
Brave Rifles DJ!

We still had AVLB's in 1/3 in 1985. I was in HHT and D Co, and I can't remember which unit had them. I remember they used them as wash racks for a long time. Left in 1989 and they were still there then. I also remember they were painted a solid green color.

Jim
artyJim
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: February 15, 2009
KitMaker: 2 posts
Armorama: 1 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 15, 2009 - 02:22 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

I'll be darned. There were two arty battalions there - - I seem to recall the other was 1/10 FA. Did Abrams have 2/39?



Oh yeah, in all his weirdness. Glad I only spent 8 months there. Of course, about 6 of that was in the field. We also had 1 & 2/30 INF, along with 3/7CAV. It was kind of crowded.



Schweinfurt was quite the place. And I totally agree that the the arty guys spent more time in the field than the armor battalions. I sent a bunch of my FOs to 2/39 when the FIST started up. A great concept and one long overdue in implementation. I went to 1/30 to be the S-3 very late in my tour. Interesting.



Howdy. I'm new here but thought I might input some related historical details.

I was @ Schweinfurt with the 1/10FA 1977-81. Agreed the other Bn was the 2/39FA.
Keep in mind there were two Kasernen there. The arty was a Ledward. The only 'armor' there was the A-Cav 2/7th cav. They had M551s when I got there but those were replaced with M 60A1s >I think< (no armor expert for all I spent 3 years @ Ft. Knox).

The arty spent about 4 months in the field a year on average but that was being increased. The A-cav spent 280(+/-) days in the field in 79 I think it was. Graf, Wielflecken, Hohenfels, border duty, alert roll outs... Guys used to try to get thrown in the stockade to avoid it until there BN-CO started getting them out to go to the field. Then they had an incident of mutiny.

So they started giving us arty guys border patrol. That could actually get interesting those days. Cold nights, old mines would go off sometimes.
Anyway, they were giving us arty boys cross training in infantry tactics. The arty unit resistance expectation in conventional warfare was 0, zero, zilch. It was understood we'd never get a gun out of the park. The 'ideal' was "for small groups and individuals to create isolated pockets of resistance for 24 hours." That was from the S-2.

Another difference was the fo arrangement. Originally, fo's were detached 13E (FDC) and selected 13B (gun bunnies). While I was there, they established 13F as a seperate MOS.

Back to your armor, those guys were at "Conn barracks." All I know is they had M60A1 at least. I don't know about later varients.

As for Schweinfurrt being quite a place- You could leisurely stroll across the kaserne in 10 minutes but it was the most built up Kaserne in the area. Had the biggest PX & commissary, western store (only one outside of Wurzburg IIRC), and a ski shop/sporting goods store. The local community was large enough to absorb the GI personnal without too much animosity. I recall Kitzigen (DIVARTY HQ) as feeling particularly sullen and resentful (not w/out some reason I grant.) The moral of soldiers there suffered accordingly.

I know this veers off topic but though you might be interested in the history considering some of the discussion.
C|:-)
10thmd
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: December 10, 2008
KitMaker: 78 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 29, 2009 - 06:25 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

The Hobby Fan kit is very nice.....an M48A5 AVLB... It needs some minor upgrades to bring it up the last version used.



Like an entirely new hull, running gear, tracks, etc. The M60 AVLB uses an M60 hull. The M48 AVLB was replaced w/M60AVLBs in the late 70's.

The M48 AVLB was used well into the 1980s, as late as 1988. Late M48 AVLBs used the same tracks as late M60 series vehicles.



If this helps I turned in my Company's 5 AVLBs while in @ID in Korea in 2005. I had two that were on M48 Chassis. both were 3 tone CARC. The 5th (float vehicle) was one tone green
chnoone
Visit this Community
Armed Forces Europe, United States
Joined: January 01, 2009
KitMaker: 1,036 posts
Armorama: 1,033 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 29, 2009 - 07:04 AM UTC
Hello Guys!

As already mentioned the M104 Wolverine is only deployed in the US, based on M1A2 hulls, I believe only around 40+ of originally 100+ were funded and built.
The USMC M1 AVLB variant is their own invention and funding, just like the Assault Breaching Vehicle M1, since they already have the scissor bridge capable of handling 70 tons.
Like in Korea all AVLB in Europe (Germany mostly) are M48 and M60 and some hulls where completely refurbished during the late 90's I believe, by a German factory. There were definitely still some M48 AVLB around in 2006/06, all tracks had the CARC camo.
There is a very good, still up to date, article in the Concord/ Pub.: 7808 ASSAULT: Journal of Armored & Heliborne Warfare Vol. 8
on the 54th Engineers in Germany.

Cheers
Christopherjavascript:PasteSmiley(':-)--%3C')
MikeMummey
Visit this Community
New Mexico, United States
Joined: February 09, 2005
KitMaker: 672 posts
Armorama: 653 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 29, 2009 - 07:44 AM UTC
Howdy Chris, there is no USMC M1 AVLB variant. The current AVLBs are built on M60A2 hulls and have the bulge below the rear grille doors. They also launch 70 ton capable bridges. The USMC did fund/field the ABV (Assault Breacher Vehicle) based on the M1 chassis. Outta here, Mike sends . . .
chnoone
Visit this Community
Armed Forces Europe, United States
Joined: January 01, 2009
KitMaker: 1,036 posts
Armorama: 1,033 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 29, 2009 - 09:13 AM UTC
Heh Mike!

I know that the Corps is / was testing the British system, that‘s the pic in Frenchy‘s reply, mounted on an older M1 hull.
Having funds or introducing them in to service yet I don‘t know, but this program is run like the ABV separately by the Corps, and has nothing to do with the Army‘s M104/ German Leguan system. I read in some article that the choice for testing the British system was made to handle the 70 tons bridges you just mentioned, already in the Corps inventory.
Did not realize the the USMC AVLB‘s are mounted on M60A2 hulls, well I never took a close look at them anyway, interesting and good to know!

Cheers
Christopher

Harleyhowie05
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: March 07, 2016
KitMaker: 1 posts
Armorama: 1 posts
Posted: Monday, March 07, 2016 - 05:46 AM UTC
I was on the AVLB"S in Vietnam
jon_a_its
Visit this Community
England - East Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: April 29, 2004
KitMaker: 1,336 posts
Armorama: 1,137 posts
Posted: Monday, March 07, 2016 - 06:58 PM UTC
AVLB?

M48A5, M60A2, M104 Wolverine, Tiguan, Bieber...

I want them all, But I'll settle for any of them
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 - 01:49 AM UTC
I can't ever remember seeing the M60 or M48 bridge layer. Doesn't mean there wasn't one. Things you have to remember about most any country close to the ocean; the rivers get pretty wide once your with ten miles of the beach. Much more than thirty miles west, and you didn't need one. Plus tanks were running out of operating room, but with a hand full of exceptions. Up towards the DMZ, you saw tanks all the way to Khe Sanh. South of there, and there was no armor till you got down by the Que Son Valley. Pretty dry in there, with maybe one river. My guess would have been II-Corps and south.

In my A.O. we had several streams to cross. We had blue crossings marked on the maps. Yet if there was a road (usually dirt, or if lucky gravel)you'd see a bridge built by combat engineers. They kept these bridges in pretty good condition, and seemed to be constantly repairing one due to mines. No AVB's out there. When you got to the coast line (mostly Highway One) you saw bridges that were new construction, or the older iron frame type. Still you'd run into a pontoon bridge every now and then. Usually right beside it was a blown up bridge. Needless to say Combat Engineers were always busy. I never ever saw a CAV troop with a bridge layer. Perhaps the 5th Mech or 69th Armor?

Just some thoughts
gary
fhvn4d
#159
Visit this Community
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: April 07, 2008
KitMaker: 803 posts
Armorama: 564 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 - 02:28 AM UTC
Is there a ribbon for thread resurrection ???? 6 and a half years is a long time to lay dormant!
 _GOTOTOP