Trumpeter have just provided us with an extensive series of images of their OWN version of the Sd.Kfz 7/1 in 1/35th scale. the Full Image Report can be seen:
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
NEWS
Trumpeter's Sd.Kfz 7/1 Image Reportjimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 15, 2009 - 01:09 AM UTC
sauceman
Ontario, Canada
Joined: September 28, 2006
KitMaker: 2,672 posts
Armorama: 2,475 posts
Joined: September 28, 2006
KitMaker: 2,672 posts
Armorama: 2,475 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 15, 2009 - 01:30 AM UTC
Not a big WW2 Axis fan, (strange but true) but I do like this one. It has lots to look at and I do love PE
cheers
cheers
nooplwb
Hong Kong S.A.R. / 繁體
Joined: April 12, 2005
KitMaker: 202 posts
Armorama: 195 posts
Joined: April 12, 2005
KitMaker: 202 posts
Armorama: 195 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 15, 2009 - 02:26 AM UTC
Just noticed the date shown on the a PE sheet was 2007........
wbill76
Texas, United States
Joined: May 02, 2006
KitMaker: 5,425 posts
Armorama: 4,659 posts
Joined: May 02, 2006
KitMaker: 5,425 posts
Armorama: 4,659 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 15, 2009 - 04:50 AM UTC
Very very interesting...the inclusion of the ammo trailer is a nice surprise. That ought to provide more dio possibilities for sure. I wonder if this will prompt DML to do the same since there's is still only in the CAD stage?
When I first saw the tan plastic for the tracks I thought they might be MKs but it looks like they are Trumpeter produced as indys and appear to be the type that can be left workable if you're sparing with the glue.
When I first saw the tan plastic for the tracks I thought they might be MKs but it looks like they are Trumpeter produced as indys and appear to be the type that can be left workable if you're sparing with the glue.
acav
Auckland, New Zealand
Joined: May 09, 2002
KitMaker: 517 posts
Armorama: 290 posts
Joined: May 09, 2002
KitMaker: 517 posts
Armorama: 290 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 15, 2009 - 08:43 AM UTC
I like the Sdkfz 7/1 with the Sd Ah 51 ammo trailer...
Hopefully Trumpeter might think about releasing the Sd Ah 51 as a standalone kit later on - maybe with some loading/unloading/passing ammo to the halftrack type of figures, Luftwaffe of course...
We can but dream.
cheers
Duncan
Hopefully Trumpeter might think about releasing the Sd Ah 51 as a standalone kit later on - maybe with some loading/unloading/passing ammo to the halftrack type of figures, Luftwaffe of course...
We can but dream.
cheers
Duncan
Posted: Sunday, March 15, 2009 - 09:25 AM UTC
another nice release will be interesting to see the retail price with all these additional goodies thrown in. Like Bill thought the tracks were MK's but it does appear not.
another release to look forward to
cheers
Keith
another release to look forward to
cheers
Keith
tjkelly
Maryland, United States
Joined: May 04, 2007
KitMaker: 1,132 posts
Armorama: 1,123 posts
Joined: May 04, 2007
KitMaker: 1,132 posts
Armorama: 1,123 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 15, 2009 - 07:51 PM UTC
Wow...two of these versions announced in one week! When was the Tamiya kit initially released...1972? Yikes! Math in public, yeah, 37 years before any updated kits. wow! Wonder what's next?
Like the Flakvierling though! Cheers!
Like the Flakvierling though! Cheers!
pzcreations
Georgia, United States
Joined: May 24, 2006
KitMaker: 2,106 posts
Armorama: 1,116 posts
Joined: May 24, 2006
KitMaker: 2,106 posts
Armorama: 1,116 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 15, 2009 - 11:30 PM UTC
"My god its full of stars! "
Im really excited about this version. Trumps kit sure looks great..and with the inclusion of the trailer..they already have Dragon beat on this one. I'll take 2 or 3 please.
Im really excited about this version. Trumps kit sure looks great..and with the inclusion of the trailer..they already have Dragon beat on this one. I'll take 2 or 3 please.
bill_c
Campaigns Administrator
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Monday, March 16, 2009 - 01:30 AM UTC
If anyone is interested in seeing what is new in this kit and what is repackaged from their Prime Mover, click here.
1.) The tracks are the same (soft plastic so making them workable takes some gentle hands, otherwise they come apart), and are not Modelkasten, though they look similar.
2.) The 2007 copyright on the PE is odd, but apparently Trumpeter knew all along they would spring this kit on us.
3.) The Sd.Kfz. 7 7/2 with 3.7cm PAK gun would seem to be all but certain now that they have the ammunition trailer done.
4.) The announcement at Nuremberg about the "gepanzerte" Sd.Kfz. 7 appears, to me at least, a ploy to deflect speculation about their plans. That vehicle, as we've already said many times here in multiple threads, is really the late version of the prime mover, with wooden cargo bed substituting for a lack of metal (many other half-tracks from that period were made with wooden parts/flatbeds/cabs and some even powered on coal).
While I'm very excited to see DML's versions of these vehicles, Trumpeter has the early lead for the following reasons:
1.) PE gun shield instead of styrene, though I haven't seen the detailing in the DML version, which they claim is scale. Other detailing in T's gun is also metal, obviating the need for an after-market upgrade;
2.) Ammo trailer included. You can't have one of these babies roaming the country with 20mm magazines bouncing all over the flat bed;
3.) Trumpeter clearly has a kit ready to go. DML is still just CAD images. Considering that their Prime Mover was supposed to be in stores nearly a year ago....
1.) The tracks are the same (soft plastic so making them workable takes some gentle hands, otherwise they come apart), and are not Modelkasten, though they look similar.
2.) The 2007 copyright on the PE is odd, but apparently Trumpeter knew all along they would spring this kit on us.
3.) The Sd.Kfz. 7 7/2 with 3.7cm PAK gun would seem to be all but certain now that they have the ammunition trailer done.
4.) The announcement at Nuremberg about the "gepanzerte" Sd.Kfz. 7 appears, to me at least, a ploy to deflect speculation about their plans. That vehicle, as we've already said many times here in multiple threads, is really the late version of the prime mover, with wooden cargo bed substituting for a lack of metal (many other half-tracks from that period were made with wooden parts/flatbeds/cabs and some even powered on coal).
While I'm very excited to see DML's versions of these vehicles, Trumpeter has the early lead for the following reasons:
1.) PE gun shield instead of styrene, though I haven't seen the detailing in the DML version, which they claim is scale. Other detailing in T's gun is also metal, obviating the need for an after-market upgrade;
2.) Ammo trailer included. You can't have one of these babies roaming the country with 20mm magazines bouncing all over the flat bed;
3.) Trumpeter clearly has a kit ready to go. DML is still just CAD images. Considering that their Prime Mover was supposed to be in stores nearly a year ago....
johhar
Alabama, United States
Joined: September 22, 2008
KitMaker: 476 posts
Armorama: 447 posts
Joined: September 22, 2008
KitMaker: 476 posts
Armorama: 447 posts
Posted: Monday, March 16, 2009 - 01:31 AM UTC
Any word on crews from either?
Trumpeter not really big on this but a great Dragon crew could put them ahead.
Trumpeter not really big on this but a great Dragon crew could put them ahead.
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Monday, March 16, 2009 - 02:53 AM UTC
Report updated with details on the new model...
bill_c
Campaigns Administrator
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Monday, March 16, 2009 - 05:20 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Whether this is a late or mid production model, I really don't know.
The Wehrmacht did not strictly differentiate among versions of the Sd.Kfz. 7 and its variants as to "early," "mid" or "late," though you can read a lot about KM numbers before the final design was settled on (some sources actually refer to the Sd.Kfz. 7 as KM 8 through 11). The letters stand for the manufacture by Kraus-Maffei, though other companies built this vehicle as well, and reflects the four evolutionary stages the design went throug. The changes mostly center on the Maybach power plant, which proved insufficient at first for the job of towing the large guns like the 88mm and 150mm howitzer, but also include things like the stowage bins at the rear, the front end and even spare tires affixed to the rear.
But once the power plant was upgraded, the vehicle seems to have been pretty well stable in design from 1937 until the end of the war. The "late" designations are mostly to reflect vehicles constructed with wooden slats or load bed. Herbert A. reports 7/1 or 7/2 variants with wooden flaps instead of the wire mesh on this model, and I am sure he is correct, though I've never seen any photos showing that form of variant. There weren't a lot of the gunned versions produced (319 of the Vierling "quad" rendered here and 123 of the 3.7 cm PAK version that I believe was only produced with an armored cab and motor). If your German is good, you can find out a lot about the vehicle if you click here. Another good source for information is the Wings & Wheels publication Sd.Kfz. 7 In Detail.
The model rendered by Trumpeter is most definitely an earlier variant of the 7/1 since the cab and bonnet aren't armored, but not truly early, since the gun has a shield on it, which apparently the earliest versions did not. It seems hard to imagine having a gun shield and an unarmored cab and motor, but so be it.
iamsu7
Vendor
Anhui, China / 简体
Joined: July 22, 2008
KitMaker: 354 posts
Armorama: 339 posts
Joined: July 22, 2008
KitMaker: 354 posts
Armorama: 339 posts
Posted: Monday, March 16, 2009 - 12:41 PM UTC
To bill_C
Sd.kfz.7/1 early version
Sd.kfz.7/1 early version
Another late version of Sd.kfz.7, But not wooden cargo
Sd.kfz.7/1 early version
Sd.kfz.7/1 early version
Another late version of Sd.kfz.7, But not wooden cargo
bill_c
Campaigns Administrator
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 - 01:42 AM UTC
Gaoyue, I appreciate these images which I have not seen previously, but I'm not totally in agreement with your assessment. My objections are mostly small and pedantic, but since we're discussing variants, I thought I should respond to your very informative post.
First of all, there were no official designations by the Waffenamt ("Office of Weapons Procurement") designating different variants between "early" or "mid," to this sort of taxonomy is really just for us to determine when in the war something was produced so we might know how to camoflage it, etc. Is this image below an early 7/1 with an added gun shield or a middle one with gun shielf factory-installed? Don't know and it doesn't really matter. It's not a "late" version.
This one is, of course, a "late" version because of the armored cab and radiator cover, as well as the different fender with its sharp angle bend. I'm not sure what you mean by a "different axle," as the photo doesn't show enough for me to see a difference. Do you mean a different hub cap? Same for the "different track," I can't see enough in the photo to determine any differences, and have never seen anything about different tracks being used later in the war. The Sd.Kfz.7 tracks were self-lubricating sealed pin tracks that performed very well in all conditions with minimal maintenance.
I'm not sure why you say that, since this looks actually like a much earlier variant except for the sharp mudguard angle at the front. I can't find my copy of [i[Allied-Axis #21[/i] (reviewed by me here) that has the earlier versions of the Sd.Kfz. 7 under their Kraus-Maffei numbers, but it looks to me like this photo above has the spare tires mounted on the rear and no storage bins.
Could it be a later version without the wooden sides? Yes, of course, but could you cite your references or other indications of why you say this is a late version other than the fenders and missing storage bins? Were the Germans producing the vehicle without the storage cabinets to save time & materials? I'm not doubting you, but you have asserted this is a late version and I just want to know how you came to that conclusion. Thanks in advance (TIA).
And one last question: is Trumpeter planning on introducing late versions of the 7/1? Your late version prime mover has the sharp fenders, so it would seem to be easy enough. You could even steal a page from Dragon's sales techniques and include a 2 for 1 "smart kit" that allows us to build either the early or late version?
First of all, there were no official designations by the Waffenamt ("Office of Weapons Procurement") designating different variants between "early" or "mid," to this sort of taxonomy is really just for us to determine when in the war something was produced so we might know how to camoflage it, etc. Is this image below an early 7/1 with an added gun shield or a middle one with gun shielf factory-installed? Don't know and it doesn't really matter. It's not a "late" version.
This one is, of course, a "late" version because of the armored cab and radiator cover, as well as the different fender with its sharp angle bend. I'm not sure what you mean by a "different axle," as the photo doesn't show enough for me to see a difference. Do you mean a different hub cap? Same for the "different track," I can't see enough in the photo to determine any differences, and have never seen anything about different tracks being used later in the war. The Sd.Kfz.7 tracks were self-lubricating sealed pin tracks that performed very well in all conditions with minimal maintenance.
Quoted Text
Another late version of Sd.kfz.7, But not wooden cargo
I'm not sure why you say that, since this looks actually like a much earlier variant except for the sharp mudguard angle at the front. I can't find my copy of [i[Allied-Axis #21[/i] (reviewed by me here) that has the earlier versions of the Sd.Kfz. 7 under their Kraus-Maffei numbers, but it looks to me like this photo above has the spare tires mounted on the rear and no storage bins.
Could it be a later version without the wooden sides? Yes, of course, but could you cite your references or other indications of why you say this is a late version other than the fenders and missing storage bins? Were the Germans producing the vehicle without the storage cabinets to save time & materials? I'm not doubting you, but you have asserted this is a late version and I just want to know how you came to that conclusion. Thanks in advance (TIA).
And one last question: is Trumpeter planning on introducing late versions of the 7/1? Your late version prime mover has the sharp fenders, so it would seem to be easy enough. You could even steal a page from Dragon's sales techniques and include a 2 for 1 "smart kit" that allows us to build either the early or late version?
Tazoslo
Oslo, Norway
Joined: October 29, 2007
KitMaker: 58 posts
Armorama: 52 posts
Joined: October 29, 2007
KitMaker: 58 posts
Armorama: 52 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 - 03:11 AM UTC
Quoted Text
2.) The 2007 copyright on the PE is odd, but apparently Trumpeter knew all along they would spring this kit on us.
The Copyright on the sheet down to the right is 2008, so its probably a work in progress over time. Perhaps the 2007 sheets was supposed to go on something else that was scrapped...or its been planned a long time
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 - 03:14 AM UTC
Honestly, I fail to see what date the PE sheets have is of ANY relevance whatsoever....
bill_c
Campaigns Administrator
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 - 03:18 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Honestly, I fail to see what date the PE sheets have is of ANY relevance whatsoever....
We're parsing this like it was an ancient text or one of the Dead Sea scrolls!
Apparently Gaoyue's photos have gone MIA.
iamsu7
Vendor
Anhui, China / 简体
Joined: July 22, 2008
KitMaker: 354 posts
Armorama: 339 posts
Joined: July 22, 2008
KitMaker: 354 posts
Armorama: 339 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 - 03:32 PM UTC
To dear bill
two kinds of hub cap,
another two type of tracks
Certainly, we can't simply say "early "or "late " version ,but we must differentiate named the KIT,
two kinds of hub cap,
another two type of tracks
Certainly, we can't simply say "early "or "late " version ,but we must differentiate named the KIT,
bill_c
Campaigns Administrator
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 19, 2009 - 02:47 AM UTC
Gaoyue xiansheng, xiexie nin!
I agree that we need names for kits, and I have no problems with Trumpeter using them as long as they are accurate. The kit shown at the Nuremberg Toy Fair says gepanzerte ("armored") and it's not. It's strictly a late war prime mover.
I was on the plane to and from a one-day business trip yesterday (part of the reason I'm behind on my reviews) and I devoured the [i[Allied-Axis #21[/i] section on the Sd.Kfz.7 and have a better grasp of its intricacies now. I want to retract two things I said earlier:
1.) The 7/2 variant was produced without an armored cab & radiator cover (strangely they did not armor the engine compartment, which was vulnerable to even small arms fire);
2.) The final photo showing the angled fenders is probably mid- to late war with no stowage bins. Those bins were likely a luxury the manufacturers could no longer afford, though I should point out there were variations in manufacture based on the different factories that made this vehicle. Buessing NAG-made Sd.Kfz.7s, for example, have some ribbing along the trailing edge of the front fenders. Perhaps this is an example of a manufacturer's variant?
The photos of the various hub caps and tracks types are interesting to fanatics like myself, but I suspect are relatively minor details to the average modeller. But I thank you for sharing them, as I'm always looking for more photos of this vehicle.
I agree that we need names for kits, and I have no problems with Trumpeter using them as long as they are accurate. The kit shown at the Nuremberg Toy Fair says gepanzerte ("armored") and it's not. It's strictly a late war prime mover.
I was on the plane to and from a one-day business trip yesterday (part of the reason I'm behind on my reviews) and I devoured the [i[Allied-Axis #21[/i] section on the Sd.Kfz.7 and have a better grasp of its intricacies now. I want to retract two things I said earlier:
1.) The 7/2 variant was produced without an armored cab & radiator cover (strangely they did not armor the engine compartment, which was vulnerable to even small arms fire);
2.) The final photo showing the angled fenders is probably mid- to late war with no stowage bins. Those bins were likely a luxury the manufacturers could no longer afford, though I should point out there were variations in manufacture based on the different factories that made this vehicle. Buessing NAG-made Sd.Kfz.7s, for example, have some ribbing along the trailing edge of the front fenders. Perhaps this is an example of a manufacturer's variant?
The photos of the various hub caps and tracks types are interesting to fanatics like myself, but I suspect are relatively minor details to the average modeller. But I thank you for sharing them, as I'm always looking for more photos of this vehicle.
iamsu7
Vendor
Anhui, China / 简体
Joined: July 22, 2008
KitMaker: 354 posts
Armorama: 339 posts
Joined: July 22, 2008
KitMaker: 354 posts
Armorama: 339 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 19, 2009 - 12:00 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Gaoyue xiansheng, xiexie nin!
I agree that we need names for kits, and I have no problems with Trumpeter using them as long as they are accurate. The kit shown at the Nuremberg Toy Fair says [i]gepanzerte['i] ("armored") and it's not. It's strictly a late war prime mover.
Yes Bill, the [i]gepanzerte['i] is wrong, It's someone's mistake.