Quoted Text
What you mean pawell, You have seen every single vehicle of this model? have pic reference of every one of them, so you can absolutely sure that this is of an incorrect camo pattern?
Dave, I don't need to see every one of them, as camouflage patterns of US Army are standardized and I have the official painting instructions at hand. And I checked that all photos of this vehicle I have, show this official pattern, as expected.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6d05/c6d05c07767c7d2a40f981f753febded4baaed0e" alt=""
Quoted Text
I checked my reference. One pic in one magazine (only one reference I got, but I think I am an expert already by looking at it). I say the camo pattern is correct, maybe the brown is 3% too dark, but I blame it on lighting effect.
I agree that colors are almost perfectly chosen. That's why the camo looks just right, regardless of its inaccuracy!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b063e/b063eb65de86eda1db874fed1b9a2e9435e19358" alt=""
Quoted Text
This is an all around great looking model grifter, and comes to camo, I don't think there is ever a set pattern rules. It's not like them tank crews have 1:1 Eduard maskings.
Unfortunately this is not truth.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6d05/c6d05c07767c7d2a40f981f753febded4baaed0e" alt=""
Tank crews don't have Eduard masking, but have precise instructions to follow, that even show exact dimmensions of particular color areas. There is no place for free-style here. Of course some variations could occur, but they will never be more that two - three inches. Below is a sample picture:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb63d/eb63de77f8aad569405642e9a38e3e0713287504" alt=""
Rgds,
Pawel