Georgia, United States
Joined: June 19, 2007
KitMaker: 254 posts
Armorama: 76 posts
Posted: Monday, April 05, 2010 - 12:57 PM UTC
England - North, United Kingdom
Joined: February 20, 2007
KitMaker: 1,453 posts
Armorama: 1,319 posts
Posted: Monday, April 05, 2010 - 01:37 PM UTC
Honestly? I think it's crying out for at least a wash to give it some depth. You've dusted up the wheels nicely. But it needs more.
From what I can see, it looks like a very clean build, and you've done a nice job on the painting side also. And you can't tell those painted-on markings from decals in the pics.
But as it is, it just looks too toy-like. The basic job is a very sound one, and just some subtle weathering would make all the difference.
- Steve
I don't need you - sixty feet of bridge I can pick up almost anywhere.
Arizona, United States
Joined: June 24, 2007
KitMaker: 45 posts
Armorama: 42 posts
Posted: Monday, April 05, 2010 - 04:16 PM UTC
Looks great but a little wear and tear wouldnt hurt.
Victoria, Australia
Joined: March 14, 2006
KitMaker: 1,973 posts
Armorama: 1,843 posts
Posted: Monday, April 05, 2010 - 04:47 PM UTC
Jeff I agree with Steve.
It's a sweet Puma !
But it needs a wash... perhaps a simple brown to give it depth. It's a great build but at the moment, it honestly looks a little toylike.
A light wash will really make a big difference !
Cheers
Paul
OddBall: "It's a wasted trip baby. Nobody said nothing about locking horns with no Tigers"
KIlgore: " I love the smell of napalm in the morning. ...The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory."
United States
Joined: March 27, 2010
KitMaker: 112 posts
Armorama: 88 posts
Posted: Monday, April 05, 2010 - 07:03 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Jeff I agree with Steve.
It's a sweet Puma !
But it needs a wash... perhaps a simple brown to give it depth. It's a great build but at the moment, it honestly looks a little toylike.
A light wash will really make a big difference !
Cheers
Paul
AGREED! How was this kit to build, it turned out very nicely for you.
North Carolina, United States
Joined: November 12, 2002
KitMaker: 357 posts
Armorama: 310 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 - 02:12 AM UTC
Just to add to the rest of the guys, yes, it needs to have some variation in the tone. Washes and weathering will take it there for certain. How did you like the engineering of the kit? Been thinking of picking one up myself.
Lugs & Pieces,
Jon a.k.a. Filthy Ghangis Jonus
Sith Lord, Darth Letcherous
The DFR
Oink,Freak'n,OINK!!!
North Carolina, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 - 05:29 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted Text
Jeff I agree with Steve.
It's a sweet Puma !
But it needs a wash... perhaps a simple brown to give it depth. It's a great build but at the moment, it honestly looks a little toylike.
A light wash will really make a big difference !
Cheers
Paul
AGREED! How was this kit to build, it turned out very nicely for you.
Justin ,I build this kit last year,it has a lot of parts in the suspension,and an interior also,but it went together very nicely,it was well engineered.And as you can see by Jeff's job here it really looks great.
Ontario, Canada
Joined: September 18, 2005
KitMaker: 1,226 posts
Armorama: 819 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 - 05:30 AM UTC
Jeff,
Nice clean build and with the sugestions from the other gentlemen you will have a very nice Puma.
Darryl
blackpoolkennels.com
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: March 12, 2010
KitMaker: 791 posts
Armorama: 592 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 - 03:25 PM UTC
It's a bit sterile, but as sort of a 'book style' it's fine by me. The question is--- are you satisfied? If you are, then great.
On the Bench:
Diopark Mercedes
AFV Club CM-11