Яusso-Soviэt Forum: Cold War Soviet Armor
For discussions related to cold war era Russo-Soviet armor.
For discussions related to cold war era Russo-Soviet armor.
Hosted by Jacques Duquette
Iranian BTR-70
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 - 03:26 PM UTC
I have a Zvezda BTR-70 kit I had thought of making into an Iranian Army version. Why Iranian? They have been in the news lately with their nuke program. So far, I haven't been able to find much information on Iranian equipment so far, as to color, marking, modifications, crew, etc. Anywhere I haven't looked yet? Thanks.
lukiftian
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: March 12, 2010
KitMaker: 791 posts
Armorama: 592 posts
Joined: March 12, 2010
KitMaker: 791 posts
Armorama: 592 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 - 04:05 PM UTC
Al-Jazeera?
Might be some links or photos there.
Might be some links or photos there.
sinfuselaje
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain / España
Joined: May 14, 2010
KitMaker: 25 posts
Armorama: 20 posts
Joined: May 14, 2010
KitMaker: 25 posts
Armorama: 20 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 09, 2010 - 02:48 AM UTC
In Google.
bison126
Correze, France
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 5,329 posts
Armorama: 5,204 posts
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 5,329 posts
Armorama: 5,204 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 09, 2010 - 04:09 AM UTC
Quoted Text
In Google.
Nice pics but unlike what state their file names, those are BTR-80s not 70s.
zapper
Skåne, Sweden
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 09, 2010 - 04:24 AM UTC
If my memory serves me right Iran never had any BTR-70. Someone else that can confirm?
Edit
Found this:
http://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/153825
Cheers,
/E
Edit
Found this:
http://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/153825
Cheers,
/E
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 09, 2010 - 06:20 AM UTC
Quoted Text
If my memory serves me right Iran never had any BTR-70. Someone else that can confirm?
Edit
Found this:
http://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/153825
Cheers,
/E
If you are correct, Wikipedia's article on the BTR-70 is wrong. (It claims Iran has 1000 BTR-70's.)
zapper
Skåne, Sweden
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 09, 2010 - 12:14 PM UTC
Well, I've been wrong before... and so have Wikipedia
Did you read Jaques reply in the link I posted?
Cheers,
/E
Did you read Jaques reply in the link I posted?
Cheers,
/E
TonyDz
United States
Joined: December 13, 2009
KitMaker: 420 posts
Armorama: 419 posts
Joined: December 13, 2009
KitMaker: 420 posts
Armorama: 419 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 09, 2010 - 12:37 PM UTC
Quoted Text
If you are correct, Wikipedia's article on the BTR-70 is wrong. (It claims Iran has 1000 BTR-70's.)
Wikipedia can not be wrong? Do you still believe in the tooth fairy? If Iran had 100 BTR70s, let alone 1000, they would have showed up by now. Everything else in their inventory has.
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 09, 2010 - 03:09 PM UTC
Well, as I stated, it is RUMORED that Iran has the BTR-70. Numbers truly unknown but the US and European military intelligence agencies still list them as possibly having them, with question marks behind the listing (so to speak). They would not be much of a tacticle or strategic asset these days, but if M.I. is willing to give them questionable existence, I am willing to keep my eyes open for pictures.
And Iran still pulls out a few surprises every now and then...how the heck (or why) they are "hiding" 100, let alone 1000, BTR-70's is beyond me and far beyond what I would speculate.
Hey Tom, go ahead and make one in Iranian service for fun if nothing else.
And Iran still pulls out a few surprises every now and then...how the heck (or why) they are "hiding" 100, let alone 1000, BTR-70's is beyond me and far beyond what I would speculate.
Hey Tom, go ahead and make one in Iranian service for fun if nothing else.
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 09, 2010 - 05:03 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextIf you are correct, Wikipedia's article on the BTR-70 is wrong. (It claims Iran has 1000 BTR-70's.)
Wikipedia can not be wrong? Do you still believe in the tooth fairy? If Iran had 100 BTR70s, let alone 1000, they would have showed up by now. Everything else in their inventory has.
Yes I know Wikipedia can be wrong. As for the tooth fairy, I guess if he existed you would have been rich by now.
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 09, 2010 - 05:06 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Well, as I stated, it is RUMORED that Iran has the BTR-70. Numbers truly unknown but the US and European military intelligence agencies still list them as possibly having them, with question marks behind the listing (so to speak). They would not be much of a tacticle or strategic asset these days, but if M.I. is willing to give them questionable existence, I am willing to keep my eyes open for pictures.
And Iran still pulls out a few surprises every now and then...how the heck (or why) they are "hiding" 100, let alone 1000, BTR-70's is beyond me and far beyond what I would speculate.
Hey Tom, go ahead and make one in Iranian service for fun if nothing else.
Nah, If Iran did have them they'd probably be used only for training. I'd rather do something somebody might fight against.
TonyDz
United States
Joined: December 13, 2009
KitMaker: 420 posts
Armorama: 419 posts
Joined: December 13, 2009
KitMaker: 420 posts
Armorama: 419 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 09, 2010 - 05:11 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Yes I know Wikipedia can be wrong. As for the tooth fairy, I guess if he existed you would have been rich by now.
Sorry Tom, I refuse to have a battle of the witts with an unarmed man.
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 09, 2010 - 05:21 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextYes I know Wikipedia can be wrong. As for the tooth fairy, I guess if he existed you would have been rich by now.
Sorry Tom, I refuse to have a battle of the witts with an unarmed man.
I don't fight with people with the minds of snotty two year olds either. Piss off.
zapper
Skåne, Sweden
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Posted: Friday, September 10, 2010 - 12:30 AM UTC
Jacques,
Noticed I missed a "c" there. Sorry about that. Can't edit the post anymore.
Cheers,
/E
Noticed I missed a "c" there. Sorry about that. Can't edit the post anymore.
Cheers,
/E
SovietBoy22
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: September 04, 2011
KitMaker: 461 posts
Armorama: 452 posts
Joined: September 04, 2011
KitMaker: 461 posts
Armorama: 452 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 18, 2012 - 06:54 AM UTC
Watch Your Language!
Berkut916
Kaunas, Lithuania
Joined: October 01, 2009
KitMaker: 149 posts
Armorama: 137 posts
Joined: October 01, 2009
KitMaker: 149 posts
Armorama: 137 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 18, 2012 - 08:41 AM UTC
According to my sources in Iran were only BTR-40/50/60.
And there was not Iran's BTR-70, and there were no nuclear weapons in Iraq, lied about what intelligence the U.S. and other countries invaded Iraq. Nuclear weapons - has been far-fetched pretext for the invasion of an independent Iraq.
And there was not Iran's BTR-70, and there were no nuclear weapons in Iraq, lied about what intelligence the U.S. and other countries invaded Iraq. Nuclear weapons - has been far-fetched pretext for the invasion of an independent Iraq.
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 18, 2012 - 05:53 PM UTC
Quoted Text
According to my sources in Iran were only BTR-40/50/60.
And there was not Iran's BTR-70, and there were no nuclear weapons in Iraq, lied about what intelligence the U.S. and other countries invaded Iraq. Nuclear weapons - has been far-fetched pretext for the invasion of an independent Iraq.
Yo, who ever said that Iraq had nuclear weapons? They did have a nuclear plant that was bombed by Israel in 1981 though. They also had tried to build a gigantic gun that could have fired shells at Israel, which was found out when the Iraqis tried shipping the barrel companents through Europe.
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Monday, February 20, 2012 - 07:03 AM UTC
First, accusations were over attempts to make nukes and over hiding chemical weapons. BUT!!! This is not the place for this...keep it topic related and take the other stuff down to the lounge, please.
Back on topic, the BTR-70 is still listed as possible in Iran...I am guessing from a possible sales report that never went through. My guess is it would have been when Russia was going to sell the Iranians the T-72S, before that deal went south.
And it is not like Iran is a open place with easy access to military equipment...
Back on topic, the BTR-70 is still listed as possible in Iran...I am guessing from a possible sales report that never went through. My guess is it would have been when Russia was going to sell the Iranians the T-72S, before that deal went south.
And it is not like Iran is a open place with easy access to military equipment...