
Hosted by Darren Baker
chains on halftrack
russamotto


Joined: December 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,389 posts
Armorama: 2,054 posts

Posted: Sunday, October 03, 2010 - 11:38 AM UTC
I've seen chains on the front tires, but not on the tracks themselves. Was this common? The vehicle is the M3 modified with a 40mm Bofors in use in the Philippines, against the Yamashita line.


Grumpyoldman


Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
Armorama: 7,297 posts

Posted: Sunday, October 03, 2010 - 02:57 PM UTC
There are chains on the tracks:


jeepman

Joined: May 25, 2003
KitMaker: 22 posts
Armorama: 22 posts

Posted: Sunday, October 03, 2010 - 03:09 PM UTC
There is what looks to be a ordinance manual photo in R.P.Hunnicutt,s Halftrack showing chains on the tracks.IMHO the reason you do not see many photos of them in action in use is that they look like they would take some time to install and remove.Also a set of two chains would take up a lot of room in or on the halftrack when not in use.Just my opinion.
redleg12

Joined: March 11, 2007
KitMaker: 872 posts
Armorama: 831 posts

Posted: Monday, October 04, 2010 - 06:23 AM UTC
Reson for chains....REALLY BAD MUD....Look at those road wheels
I am sure, especiall with the weight on the back end of the half track that they tried anything!!! I would bet this was a field modification!!
Rounds Complete!!
I am sure, especiall with the weight on the back end of the half track that they tried anything!!! I would bet this was a field modification!!
Rounds Complete!!

jeepman

Joined: May 25, 2003
KitMaker: 22 posts
Armorama: 22 posts

Posted: Monday, October 04, 2010 - 02:31 PM UTC
Redleg, As I stated above,this is not a field mod.I just found a picture in the Concord book,US Halftracks in Combat 1941-1945,on page 59 of a French 2nd Armored Division halftrack eguipped with the same set of chains.This is about as far from the Pacific as you can get.Also in the Ian Allan publishing book,Military Vehicles in Detail series,US Half-tracks,M2-M3-M5-M9,there is a photo on page 25 showing the tool used to install the chain on the track.This photo is credited to the tech manual.Just for your info.

jeepman

Joined: May 25, 2003
KitMaker: 22 posts
Armorama: 22 posts

Posted: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 - 12:09 AM UTC
[quote]Redleg, As I stated above,this is not a field mod.I just found a picture in the Concord book,US Halftracks in Combat 1941-1945,on page 59 of a French 2nd Armored Division halftrack eguipped with the same set of chains.This is about as far from the Pacific as you can get.Also in the Ian Allan publishing book,Military Vehicles in Detail series,US Half-tracks,M2-M3-M5-M9,there is a photo on page 25 showing the tool used to install the chain on the track.This photo is credited to the tech manual.If by field mod you mean the 40 mm I agree this is a field mod.

CDK

Joined: September 24, 2006
KitMaker: 358 posts
Armorama: 339 posts

Posted: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 - 01:59 AM UTC
Track chains are most definitely not a field mod, these are standard issue and don't take up all that much room when fitted into their own respective bags and stowed under the rear seats.
They are covered in fairly great depth in both TM 9-707 and TM 9-710 which shows not only several pictures of installation but maintenance and stowing of these chains as well.
HTH

They are covered in fairly great depth in both TM 9-707 and TM 9-710 which shows not only several pictures of installation but maintenance and stowing of these chains as well.
HTH

redleg12

Joined: March 11, 2007
KitMaker: 872 posts
Armorama: 831 posts

Posted: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 - 02:24 AM UTC
I bow to the TM......thanks for the correction
I would not want to carry all that chain
Rounds Complete!!
I would not want to carry all that chain

Rounds Complete!!

CDK

Joined: September 24, 2006
KitMaker: 358 posts
Armorama: 339 posts

Posted: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 - 02:44 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I would not want to carry all that chain![]()
Well Mike,
you could always just hang them on the side if you wanted, of course you'll risk getting stuck that way.


![]() |