Posted new photos of the last few LAV-3 TUA's before they go to rebuild, never to be seen again.
Linkie:
http://s87.photobucket.com/home/ldshrecceboy
Cheers
Anthony
Hosted by Darren Baker
Last Of the LAV-3 TUA's
recceboy
Alberta, Canada
Joined: July 20, 2006
KitMaker: 706 posts
Armorama: 665 posts
Joined: July 20, 2006
KitMaker: 706 posts
Armorama: 665 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 14, 2010 - 03:54 PM UTC
GaryGore
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 338 posts
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 338 posts
Posted: Friday, October 15, 2010 - 01:46 AM UTC
What are we using for a mobile AT system today? Or have we gotten rid of that idea all together?
gcdavidson
Ontario, Canada
Joined: August 05, 2003
KitMaker: 1,698 posts
Armorama: 1,563 posts
Joined: August 05, 2003
KitMaker: 1,698 posts
Armorama: 1,563 posts
Posted: Friday, October 15, 2010 - 09:45 AM UTC
Leopard 2A6 / 2A4 & ADATS
Tongue planted halfway in cheek. Though they do say the best anti-tank system is another tank.
I wonder how hard it would be to slap a TOW on the side of a Coyote or LAV-III turret, like the Bradley or Desert Warrior?
Tongue planted halfway in cheek. Though they do say the best anti-tank system is another tank.
I wonder how hard it would be to slap a TOW on the side of a Coyote or LAV-III turret, like the Bradley or Desert Warrior?
Brad-M
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: June 06, 2008
KitMaker: 402 posts
Armorama: 393 posts
Joined: June 06, 2008
KitMaker: 402 posts
Armorama: 393 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 - 02:55 PM UTC
So we order a whole hockey sock of these only to say that we are converting them to something else...what's wrong with this type of thinking????
Brad
Brad
gcdavidson
Ontario, Canada
Joined: August 05, 2003
KitMaker: 1,698 posts
Armorama: 1,563 posts
Joined: August 05, 2003
KitMaker: 1,698 posts
Armorama: 1,563 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 - 03:41 PM UTC
email LGen Leslie, he might answer you!
Seriously, I think the reduction of the TUA was part of the "we've been in Afghanistan for 10 years...if we haven't deployed a particular piece of kit in all that time, then why is it still in inventory". At least LAV-TUA are new enough to be reconfigured.
Seriously, I think the reduction of the TUA was part of the "we've been in Afghanistan for 10 years...if we haven't deployed a particular piece of kit in all that time, then why is it still in inventory". At least LAV-TUA are new enough to be reconfigured.