did anybody every do a kit of this track? Or maybe make somekind of a resin conversion?
gary
Hosted by Darren Baker
M114
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 - 05:25 AM UTC
ptruhe
Texas, United States
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 - 05:33 AM UTC
joegrafton
United Kingdom
Joined: October 04, 2009
KitMaker: 1,209 posts
Armorama: 1,143 posts
Joined: October 04, 2009
KitMaker: 1,209 posts
Armorama: 1,143 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 - 06:32 AM UTC
This was the track that was phased out of Vietnam pretty quickly, wasn't it?
Joe.
Joe.
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 - 06:13 AM UTC
Quoted Text
This was the track that was phased out of Vietnam pretty quickly, wasn't it?
Joe.
South Vietnamese used them all thru the war, and at least one CAV unit used them in their recon platoons. Were not well thought of. They were still in use in the early 1980's with some NG units as I saw them parked.
And to really add to this madness, did anybody happen to catch the M46 kit??????? These guys are going to bankrupt me!
Is there a dealer for Accurate Armor stuff in the United States? If not, then who has them in London? (my kid is over there three or four times a year)
gary
Thatguy
Virginia, United States
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 - 06:38 AM UTC
Quoted Text
South Vietnamese used them all thru the war, and at least one CAV unit used them in their recon platoons. Were not well thought of. They were still in use in the early 1980's with some NG units as I saw them parked.
South Vietnamese received their first M114s in 1962 and were so dissatisfied with them that they had been completely phased out for M113s by 1964. The experiences with them in the ARVN pretty much directly led to the MTOEs for Vietnam bound US Army Cavalry units, where the M113 was also substituted.
Demand for M113s in Southeast Asia, however, meant that US Army Cavalry units in Europe and CONUS were equipped with the vehicles right into the 1970s (included the "improved" version with a 20mm cannon).
Sudzonic
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: December 07, 2007
KitMaker: 2,096 posts
Armorama: 1,983 posts
Joined: December 07, 2007
KitMaker: 2,096 posts
Armorama: 1,983 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 - 06:42 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextThis was the track that was phased out of Vietnam pretty quickly, wasn't it?
Joe.
South Vietnamese used them all thru the war, and at least one CAV unit used them in their recon platoons. Were not well thought of. They were still in use in the early 1980's with some NG units as I saw them parked.
And to really add to this madness, did anybody happen to catch the M46 kit??????? These guys are going to bankrupt me!
Is there a dealer for Accurate Armor stuff in the United States? If not, then who has them in London? (my kid is over there three or four times a year)
gary
Accurate Armour do world wide mail order as far as i know?
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 - 08:36 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextSouth Vietnamese used them all thru the war, and at least one CAV unit used them in their recon platoons. Were not well thought of. They were still in use in the early 1980's with some NG units as I saw them parked.
South Vietnamese received their first M114s in 1962 and were so dissatisfied with them that they had been completely phased out for M113s by 1964. The experiences with them in the ARVN pretty much directly led to the MTOEs for Vietnam bound US Army Cavalry units, where the M113 was also substituted.
Demand for M113s in Southeast Asia, however, meant that US Army Cavalry units in Europe and CONUS were equipped with the vehicles right into the 1970s (included the "improved" version with a 20mm cannon).
Brother in law drove a recon track for awhile with the 1/4 CAV, and it was an M114. He came home in the summer of 1969. The first four months of his tour was with the Quarter Cav, and later was sent north to B/1/1` armored Cav. I remember this so well as he told me the M114's were given to newbies. I can also remember seeing M114's on Highway One just north of DaNang, and also down by Duc Pho in the spring of 68. Might have been Koreans using them near Duc Pho as they didn't mix well with the Arvins down that way
gary
ptruhe
Texas, United States
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 - 09:50 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Is there a dealer for Accurate Armor stuff in the United States? If not, then who has them in London?
Ordering direct from Accurate Armour is easy and they ship quickly. Plus you get the export price minus VAT.
I found out the hard way that if you buy over there that you don't get the VAT refund when you leave. I think only large companies participate in the VAT refund program.
Paul
Thatguy
Virginia, United States
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 - 09:55 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Brother in law drove a recon track for awhile with the 1/4 CAV, and it was an M114. He came home in the summer of 1969. The first four months of his tour was with the Quarter Cav, and later was sent north to B/1/1` armored Cav. I remember this so well as he told me the M114's were given to newbies. I can also remember seeing M114's on Highway One just north of DaNang, and also down by Duc Pho in the spring of 68. Might have been Koreans using them near Duc Pho as they didn't mix well with the Arvins down that way
gary
No disrespect, but I can say with almost complete confidence that the US Army never used the M114 in Vietnam. The MTOEs developed for Vietnam clearly stated that all M114s in cavalry units were to be substituted for M113s. This change followed the tests of the M114 by the ARVN, which saw the vehicle quickly withdrawn from service. Confusing the 2 vehicles would not be difficult in my mind as they are visually similar, with the M114 being smaller.
On ARVN usage:
Quoted Text
In March 1964 the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV) and the High Command, Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces (RVNAF), decided to replace, because of limited trafficability of the M114, four M114-equipped troops with mechanized rifle troops (M113) and to organize two new mechanized rifle troops. This was begun in May 1964 and completed in July 1964.
From an Army Concept Team in Vietnam (ACTIV) report titled "Final Report, Armor Organization for Counterinsurgency Operations in Vietnam," dated 1966. The M114 is mentioned on briefly, including the quoted passage, and is not mentioned or listed in the discussion of any of the ARVN's armored cavalry units (the M24 tank and M8 armored car, however, are still listed). The ARVN may have retained some M114s after 1964, but their numbers would have been very small.
joegrafton
United Kingdom
Joined: October 04, 2009
KitMaker: 1,209 posts
Armorama: 1,143 posts
Joined: October 04, 2009
KitMaker: 1,209 posts
Armorama: 1,143 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 - 11:21 AM UTC
Gary,
Accurate Armour are in Scotland. Not London, England. It's probably a good 10 hour drive away from London going at a fair lick! Now I know that isn't much of a distance for you guys in the States but over here that is a long way! LOL
You are probably better off getting them to send it to you.
Joe.
Accurate Armour are in Scotland. Not London, England. It's probably a good 10 hour drive away from London going at a fair lick! Now I know that isn't much of a distance for you guys in the States but over here that is a long way! LOL
You are probably better off getting them to send it to you.
Joe.
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Friday, October 22, 2010 - 05:52 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Gary,
Accurate Armour are in Scotland. Not London, England. It's probably a good 10 hour drive away from London going at a fair lick! Now I know that isn't much of a distance for you guys in the States but over here that is a long way! LOL
You are probably better off getting them to send it to you.
Joe.
OK Joe, I have a question for you or maybe another friend from the UK. Is there a duty free store that sells kits located in Heathrow? If there is one, I'll have my youngest kid pick one up while in London (he's over there four or five times a year). Also where is Hannets in London?
gary
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Friday, October 22, 2010 - 05:58 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextBrother in law drove a recon track for awhile with the 1/4 CAV, and it was an M114. He came home in the summer of 1969. The first four months of his tour was with the Quarter Cav, and later was sent north to B/1/1` armored Cav. I remember this so well as he told me the M114's were given to newbies. I can also remember seeing M114's on Highway One just north of DaNang, and also down by Duc Pho in the spring of 68. Might have been Koreans using them near Duc Pho as they didn't mix well with the Arvins down that way
gary
No disrespect, but I can say with almost complete confidence that the US Army never used the M114 in Vietnam. The MTOEs developed for Vietnam clearly stated that all M114s in cavalry units were to be substituted for M113s. This change followed the tests of the M114 by the ARVN, which saw the vehicle quickly withdrawn from service. Confusing the 2 vehicles would not be difficult in my mind as they are visually similar, with the M114 being smaller.
On ARVN usage:Quoted TextIn March 1964 the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV) and the High Command, Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces (RVNAF), decided to replace, because of limited trafficability of the M114, four M114-equipped troops with mechanized rifle troops (M113) and to organize two new mechanized rifle troops. This was begun in May 1964 and completed in July 1964.
From an Army Concept Team in Vietnam (ACTIV) report titled "Final Report, Armor Organization for Counterinsurgency Operations in Vietnam," dated 1966. The M114 is mentioned on briefly, including the quoted passage, and is not mentioned or listed in the discussion of any of the ARVN's armored cavalry units (the M24 tank and M8 armored car, however, are still listed). The ARVN may have retained some M114s after 1964, but their numbers would have been very small.
take this as written in stone! I walked past about a dozen of them back in the early to mid 1980's in a parking lot at Camp Attebery in Indiana. These were not junk to shoot at, and all looked to be in very good condition. This was right close to the Allison test track down there, and on the main road the goes right thru the middle of the place (north & south).
gary
dobon68
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: June 19, 2007
KitMaker: 392 posts
Armorama: 329 posts
Joined: June 19, 2007
KitMaker: 392 posts
Armorama: 329 posts
Posted: Friday, October 22, 2010 - 11:23 AM UTC
Quoted Text
OK Joe, I have a question for you or maybe another friend from the UK. Is there a duty free store that sells kits located in Heathrow? If there is one, I'll have my youngest kid pick one up while in London (he's over there four or five times a year). Also where is Hannets in London?
gary
Gary,
There is no duty free store selling model kits in Heathrow or any other British airport for that matter, unless the designer houses have started making kits that is
As for Hannants they are in Colindale in North London I would say about a half hour underground tube ride from central London on the Northern Line and it's very close to the RAF museum and only a short walk from Colindale tube station.
If you were hoping to get Accurate Armour stuff from them I don't think they stock them as a rule even though they are listed in their list of manufacturers.
Hope this helps you.
David
dobon68
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: June 19, 2007
KitMaker: 392 posts
Armorama: 329 posts
Joined: June 19, 2007
KitMaker: 392 posts
Armorama: 329 posts
Posted: Friday, October 22, 2010 - 11:34 AM UTC
Gary,
I 've just checked the Accurate Armour website and they sell to non EEC countries at export prices so you will save the cost of duty buying direct from them. The following is copied and pasted directly from their website.
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION EXPORT EC
K030V US Army M114 APC (Vietnam era) £ 51.05 £ 59.98
I'm not sure of postage costs but I have brought from them myself and have to say their customer service is second to none. One kit I brought I didn't check for a few weeks and when opened a few bits were missing, gave them a call and the missing bits were in the post and arrived at my address the next day with a hand written apology.
Cheers
David
I 've just checked the Accurate Armour website and they sell to non EEC countries at export prices so you will save the cost of duty buying direct from them. The following is copied and pasted directly from their website.
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION EXPORT EC
K030V US Army M114 APC (Vietnam era) £ 51.05 £ 59.98
I'm not sure of postage costs but I have brought from them myself and have to say their customer service is second to none. One kit I brought I didn't check for a few weeks and when opened a few bits were missing, gave them a call and the missing bits were in the post and arrived at my address the next day with a hand written apology.
Cheers
David
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 23, 2010 - 05:48 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Gary,
I 've just checked the Accurate Armour website and they sell to non EEC countries at export prices so you will save the cost of duty buying direct from them. The following is copied and pasted directly from their website.
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION EXPORT EC
K030V US Army M114 APC (Vietnam era) £ 51.05 £ 59.98
I'm not sure of postage costs but I have brought from them myself and have to say their customer service is second to none. One kit I brought I didn't check for a few weeks and when opened a few bits were missing, gave them a call and the missing bits were in the post and arrived at my address the next day with a hand written apology.
Cheers
David
I'll probably just go that route as I'm also thinking about the M46 as well (I have the DML kit somewhere). There's supposed to be a couple audio equipment shops at Heathrow, and the kid keeps forgetting to find out where they are at (he's probably mad at me for putting the cat ahead of him and his brothers in the will)
gary
rebelsoldier
Arizona, United States
Joined: June 30, 2004
KitMaker: 1,336 posts
Armorama: 757 posts
Joined: June 30, 2004
KitMaker: 1,336 posts
Armorama: 757 posts
Posted: Monday, November 08, 2010 - 11:44 AM UTC
hiya gang!
i was trained in the m114 at ft knox in 69[ scout school ]and i didn't see a 113 until i hit nam at zian[ 11th aromored cavalry ].
was a fun training vehicle is about all i can say about it.
thanks for advice where to get one.
have a good one!
reb
i was trained in the m114 at ft knox in 69[ scout school ]and i didn't see a 113 until i hit nam at zian[ 11th aromored cavalry ].
was a fun training vehicle is about all i can say about it.
thanks for advice where to get one.
have a good one!
reb
Delta42
Georgia, United States
Joined: August 27, 2002
KitMaker: 616 posts
Armorama: 511 posts
Joined: August 27, 2002
KitMaker: 616 posts
Armorama: 511 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - 12:18 PM UTC
WOW!!! I haven't thought about the M114 in years. Didn't think anyone produced a model of it. The Cav unit that was co-located with us in Germany in 1977 had then along with M551s. But they soon (as well as I remember about 6 months later) changed them out for M60A1s. Glad they are available.
Thatguy
Virginia, United States
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - 03:02 PM UTC
Quoted Text
take this as written in stone! I walked past about a dozen of them back in the early to mid 1980's in a parking lot at Camp Attebery in Indiana. These were not junk to shoot at, and all looked to be in very good condition. This was right close to the Allison test track down there, and on the main road the goes right thru the middle of the place (north & south).
gary
Never said that the US Army didn't actively field them, just not in Vietnam. They were all over CONUS and Europe, mostly to help free up M113s for southeast Asia. As noted they lingered to varying degrees into the 1980s, before finally being phased out entirely.
BigDaddybluesman
Texas, United States
Joined: November 17, 2010
KitMaker: 119 posts
Armorama: 81 posts
Joined: November 17, 2010
KitMaker: 119 posts
Armorama: 81 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 - 04:17 AM UTC
I was in the 11th ACR also. I trained at Knox in 1980 and went to Germany.
The M114 was fun to drive, they had small block Chevy engines and were fast and maneuverable. They were a great vehicle to drive some of the old timers told me. BUT they were terrible in combat(gas engine NOT good). The Army DID use them early in Nam and recalled them quickly, ARVN also used them and did not like them, all M114s were replaced in front line units with M113s. NOBODY liked them in combat, everybody loved them to just drive around in.
So you probably had working vehicles all around the states(Army, Army reserve and NG units) and Nam for years just not in combat. I never saw a working one, only museum pieces.
The M114 was fun to drive, they had small block Chevy engines and were fast and maneuverable. They were a great vehicle to drive some of the old timers told me. BUT they were terrible in combat(gas engine NOT good). The Army DID use them early in Nam and recalled them quickly, ARVN also used them and did not like them, all M114s were replaced in front line units with M113s. NOBODY liked them in combat, everybody loved them to just drive around in.
So you probably had working vehicles all around the states(Army, Army reserve and NG units) and Nam for years just not in combat. I never saw a working one, only museum pieces.
Thatguy
Virginia, United States
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 - 05:03 AM UTC
Quoted Text
The Army DID use them early in Nam and recalled them quickly...
I hate to keep harping on this, but there is nothing to support this. The ARVN was the only user in the region, and quickly disposed of them.
ptruhe
Texas, United States
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 - 05:15 AM UTC
Being in that it is a Vietnam era vehicle I'm sure it would have at least been trialed in Vietnam.
Nice camo scheme of a M114 (not in Vietnam):
http://www.defenseimagery.mil/imagery.html#a=search&s=m-114&chk=6cfe0&guid=22ba94324f6600db5e20f3dad4e30622b0ad6a46
Paul
Nice camo scheme of a M114 (not in Vietnam):
http://www.defenseimagery.mil/imagery.html#a=search&s=m-114&chk=6cfe0&guid=22ba94324f6600db5e20f3dad4e30622b0ad6a46
Paul
BigDaddybluesman
Texas, United States
Joined: November 17, 2010
KitMaker: 119 posts
Armorama: 81 posts
Joined: November 17, 2010
KitMaker: 119 posts
Armorama: 81 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 - 07:08 AM UTC
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=AD343708&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
This does support the possible use of the M114 by US forces but is not definitive.
I don't think he's referring to an ARVN troop commander, maybe the unit had a US officer in charge of those vehicles. If it were one he would have called him an ARVN commander not a troop commander which is CAV. I think he says CAV troop commander. This leads me to believe that indeed a small US CAV troop did in fact use them in an operation. Although he does not state it was a US Army officer he does imply it. Although that could be his way of substantiating the report and not just saying the ARVN troops reported this which would probably not have as much impact.
Plus no copies were sent to any Vietnam army personnel.
So far I information I could get was that 80 M114s were sent to ARVN mech forces, they quickly sent them back. What happened to what was left of the remaining M114s? I bet Army personnel used them for something, very little of what went their came back except for equipment that was needed in other theaters like M113s (I'm sure some of the tracks we had were rebuilt Vietnam M113s) and other newer weapons and systems.
So yes ARVN forces used them but since they were given back I'm sure some served in some type of way for the US Army in country. What and were I have yet to find out.
That report does lead me to believe he was talking about n operation by ARVN forces and NOT US Army forces.
So I doubt that any M114s saw combat with US forces they were probably used in the rear with the gear. My search will continue. But to definitively say they were never used by US forces in country is impossible unless you were there and were in a CAV unit or similar type unit that used those types of vehicles. I was in the 11ACR but did not serve in Nam.
This does support the possible use of the M114 by US forces but is not definitive.
I don't think he's referring to an ARVN troop commander, maybe the unit had a US officer in charge of those vehicles. If it were one he would have called him an ARVN commander not a troop commander which is CAV. I think he says CAV troop commander. This leads me to believe that indeed a small US CAV troop did in fact use them in an operation. Although he does not state it was a US Army officer he does imply it. Although that could be his way of substantiating the report and not just saying the ARVN troops reported this which would probably not have as much impact.
Plus no copies were sent to any Vietnam army personnel.
So far I information I could get was that 80 M114s were sent to ARVN mech forces, they quickly sent them back. What happened to what was left of the remaining M114s? I bet Army personnel used them for something, very little of what went their came back except for equipment that was needed in other theaters like M113s (I'm sure some of the tracks we had were rebuilt Vietnam M113s) and other newer weapons and systems.
So yes ARVN forces used them but since they were given back I'm sure some served in some type of way for the US Army in country. What and were I have yet to find out.
That report does lead me to believe he was talking about n operation by ARVN forces and NOT US Army forces.
So I doubt that any M114s saw combat with US forces they were probably used in the rear with the gear. My search will continue. But to definitively say they were never used by US forces in country is impossible unless you were there and were in a CAV unit or similar type unit that used those types of vehicles. I was in the 11ACR but did not serve in Nam.
Thatguy
Virginia, United States
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 - 08:03 AM UTC
Quoted Text
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=AD343708&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
This does support the possible use of the M114 by US forces but is not definitive.
I don't think he's referring to an ARVN troop commander, maybe the unit had a US officer in charge of those vehicles. If it were one he would have called him an ARVN commander not a troop commander which is CAV. I think he says CAV troop commander. This leads me to believe that indeed a small US CAV troop did in fact use them in an operation. Although he does not state it was a US Army officer he does imply it. Although that could be his way of substantiating the report and not just saying the ARVN troops reported this which would probably not have as much impact.
Plus no copies were sent to any Vietnam army personnel.
That's the Army Concept Team in Vietnam report on the development of the ARVN Mechanized Reconnaissance Troop, equipped with the M114. It is, without a doubt, referring to the ARVN. There were no US armored elements in Vietnam until 1965.
US advisors were heavily involved. The ACTIV report was for the benefit of US planners, not the ARVN, so its not surprising that no copies would have been sent to the ARVN. The results of the tests were already known to them, since they were conducting them. The ACTIV report is only an evaluation.
From Chapter 2, [u]Mounted Combat in Vientam[/u] (emphasis added):
Quoted Text
For a year the Army Concept Team in Vietnam evaluated the combat actions of the [ARVN] armored cavalry reconnaissance squadrons equipped with the M114. Although the squadrons had a few organizational and logistical problems, their critical problem was that the M114 could not move cross-country and had difficulty entering and leaving waterways. Since these defects limited the usefulness of M114's in Vietnam, the armored reconnaissance vehicles were replaced by M113's. Most Vietnamese reconnaissance squadrons. began transition training with the M113 in April and finished by November 1964.
Quoted Text
So far I information I could get was that 80 M114s were sent to ARVN mech forces, they quickly sent them back. What happened to what was left of the remaining M114s? I bet Army personnel used them for something, very little of what went their came back except for equipment that was needed in other theaters like M113s (I'm sure some of the tracks we had were rebuilt Vietnam M113s) and other newer weapons and systems.
I would imagine without spare parts and proper care that these vehicles rusted in ARVN depots along with a wide array of other vehicles.
Quoted Text
But to definitively say they were never used by US forces in country is impossible unless you were there and were in a CAV unit or similar type unit that used those types of vehicles.
That's a cop out, which suggests that no secondary history is at all reliable unless it contains nothing but first person accounts and is written by an actual eye witness. There is no evidence, aside from a single related anecdote in this thread, that has so far been presented that supports the conclusion, and a number of pieces that in fact support the opposite. I can, with 99% certainty, say that no M114s were used by the US Army in Vietnam.
BigDaddybluesman
Texas, United States
Joined: November 17, 2010
KitMaker: 119 posts
Armorama: 81 posts
Joined: November 17, 2010
KitMaker: 119 posts
Armorama: 81 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 - 08:46 AM UTC
You have the right to believe whatever you want to.
The information I researched tends to agree with you, that initially the US Army DID NOT use the M114.
Knowing the Army having been in it I would have to say there is a very good possibility that some officers or higher ranking NCOs that liked the vehicle and used them for something in country. Like in the rear with the gear. Or for having a ride, they were very fast little vehicles on roads. And high ranking soldiers get what they want mostly when it comes to perks.
But I am guessing and until I read or see something that supports my feelings I have to treat them as that, my feelings based on experience.
Sitting rusting some where, I don't think so. In the Army those days they found a use for everything. In fact during my research I found that the army did not retire them until the early 1980s even though General Abrams in 1970 said they were to be retired due to them being a total failure.
The information I researched tends to agree with you, that initially the US Army DID NOT use the M114.
Knowing the Army having been in it I would have to say there is a very good possibility that some officers or higher ranking NCOs that liked the vehicle and used them for something in country. Like in the rear with the gear. Or for having a ride, they were very fast little vehicles on roads. And high ranking soldiers get what they want mostly when it comes to perks.
But I am guessing and until I read or see something that supports my feelings I have to treat them as that, my feelings based on experience.
Sitting rusting some where, I don't think so. In the Army those days they found a use for everything. In fact during my research I found that the army did not retire them until the early 1980s even though General Abrams in 1970 said they were to be retired due to them being a total failure.
chefchris
North Carolina, United States
Joined: February 06, 2006
KitMaker: 1,544 posts
Armorama: 1,464 posts
Joined: February 06, 2006
KitMaker: 1,544 posts
Armorama: 1,464 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 - 09:57 AM UTC
I was at the Tank Museum in Danville, Va. on saturday and they have one - the first thing that struck me was the size of it..... very small. Surely the M114 would have a had a hard time with all the rice patties(?) and being gas-powered wouldn't have helped much either....
Chris
Chris