data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9609/e96090841ce3554165734c82fdcea8690ce32966" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5914/e59147cecd68a73d43a55bac929eedefaf726a97" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0801/c0801817740078e2e341f5d1d5d59a0de8c77892" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7839/b78394f8e4cb8e6543da1a95dbedeb675d33bc1b" alt=""
rb
that looks great, nice groundwork, Paint on the t-34 is really nice.
A Niggle If I May, The suspension looks highly unrealistic in its current state, the wheel on the ground would be compressed, and the 4 wheels in the air would have dropped considerably, this detracts highly from an otherwise interesting, and well done piece,
Lpj
I wasn't following it up, its to advanced to change even if you wanted to so why drag the waters? what do i care as long as you are happy with the kit, was just a honest observation.
If you want the unabridged version of my current comment as it stands, seeming you obviously wanted to take the conversation further by posting flawed evidence.
the pictures you posted show articulated suspension, they have
substantial dips in the middle, yours are flat. simple as.
the max speed on average of a t-34 was 28 mph and
here is a video, showing the instant suspension drop of a t-34/85
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=9WDAROEzsCY#t=5s
look very carefully.
from a model perspective, excellent, but as you decided to revive the argument those are my points.
Lpj
![]() |