_GOTOBOTTOM
Figures
Military figures of all shapes and sizes.
BEF 1940
Biggles2
Visit this Community
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 - 04:33 AM UTC
Is there any significant differences between Dragon's Monte Cassino troops and the earlier BEF uniform? I know they will need a chest respirator pack, but is there anything other than that? I believe there were some minor differences in BD construction which will not be very apparent in 1/35. It's too bad they are not consistent with the BEF troop set as they are not wearing greatcoats.
gerarddt
Visit this Community
Walloon Brabant, Belgium
Joined: January 09, 2007
KitMaker: 78 posts
Armorama: 77 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 - 05:03 AM UTC
The difference is located at the pouches. For the BEF they are fixed in the middle on the belt.

Gérard
Hohenstaufen
Visit this Community
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: December 13, 2004
KitMaker: 2,192 posts
Armorama: 1,615 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 - 07:30 AM UTC
Biggles,
The biggest change to BD through the war was that early issues had a fly front which hid all the buttons (likewise the breast pockets).If the Monte Cassino figures have this they will be fine. Note that BEF troops had no formation signs or other badges apart from rank insignia, and a thin arm of service strip. I don't understand the comment about pouches, the webbing is 38 pattern in both cases. Individuals might wear their pouches differently in combat according to comfort and experience.The main difference is that all BEF troops tended to wear the gasmask pouch in the "alert" position on the chest.
Biggles2
Visit this Community
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 - 10:02 AM UTC
I didn't totally understand the comment about the pouches either, but it might be a reference to much earlier equipment some troops were issued with - such as leather belts and ammo pouches dating to WWl!
JohnHobson
Visit this Community
England - North East, United Kingdom
Joined: September 29, 2005
KitMaker: 27 posts
Armorama: 24 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 - 10:14 AM UTC
Earlier pouches were shorter and hung on the belt so half the pouch was below and half of it above the belt

Later pouches were increased slightly to allow sten magazines to fit and hung on the belt so around 40% of the pouch was below the belt and 60% above.


Hope that helps

John
exer
Visit this Community
Dublin, Ireland
Joined: November 27, 2004
KitMaker: 6,048 posts
Armorama: 4,619 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 - 11:44 AM UTC
It's '37 pattern webbing, not '38.

The difference in the pouches can be seen in this photo on the 37 pattern page here on the excellent karkee web site
Biggles2
Visit this Community
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 - 04:35 AM UTC
Interesting and useful info on the Basic Pouch. Thanks Pat.
SdAufKla
Visit this Community
South Carolina, United States
Joined: May 07, 2010
KitMaker: 2,238 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Posted: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 - 05:13 AM UTC

Quoted Text

... The difference in the pouches can be seen ... on the excellent ... Karkee web site



Thanks for that link, Pat!

Great site.
 _GOTOTOP