_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Axis - WWII
Armor and ground forces of the Axis forces during World War II.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Tiger 1 Initial - Germany 1945 build log
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Monday, June 16, 2014 - 08:08 PM UTC
Hey hey,

After having a lot of fun posting my Syrian Rebel T-55 build and more importantly finishing it (my first kit in years!), I am raring to go on the next project.
I've been thinking about something along these lines for a while but actually the techniques used on the T-55 I felt had a lot in common with what I could accomplish on this one and so it seems like a natural progression somewhat.

I'd been thinking about a Tiger for a while but I have only built Tamiya's old tool offering as a kid and I got as far as the interior on Academy's mid version back in around 2001. As such a prominent AFV it was certainly about time I got one on the bench, however I didn't have one in the stash and they are not the cheapest AFV to buy so I was waiting for an excuse; fortunately it was my 30th birthday at the end of May and as such I had the perfect excuse to spend some serious money on model kits!

So happy birthday to me; looks like all the best things come in boxes!



I went for Tamiya as they are by far my favourite manufacturer. Not without their flaws but for a good solid kit of an AFV such as this one you can't go wrong!

So why an initial? Well I like things a bit different and although the late models with their steel wheels are probably a better looking tank I wanted to strip it back to its bare bones and portray an old warrior, very similar in style to my Syrian T-55 (except maybe without the graffiti!). I'm not going for a specific vehicle and so will be using artistic license, however I do like to model in the realms of reality and so can justify using an initial: The last Tiger 1 to see action in Berlin was the infamous '323' and is an early model. The very first Tiger 1 (250001) manufactured was also found at the end of the war by British troops (albeit not in running order!) see
here but shows at least that survivors were around. Potentially more interesting is this photo, which I found on my PC but can't find more info for:



This is labelled as being in Berlin but I can't verify it. Front hull towing points and the turret appear to be indicative of an initial production and the photo certainly seems to be post war, so I'm happy with the theory at least.
If anyone has more info on the pic I'd love to learn more.

So no build is complete without some aftermarket, this is what I've picked up:



A RB model barrel and panzer art mantlet - both of these are later production versions, designed to show that the old girl has had her armament swapped at some point. Also there are some RB shackles, for no other reason than they are cheap and don't require difficult clean-up like the plastic kit versions.



Some roadwheels without rubber, a great feature to show with the earlier production models, and some initial stowage bins as used by Tiger 100 in Russia. I'm a bit dubious myself as to if I should use the latter, as its a bit more specific than I realised at the time of purchase, but I do like how these early bins make the Tiger look and will be great for adding battle damage.



Good old Eduard PE - nice and simple! The Sturmtiger grills will fit the initial but were all the shop had in stock. The clasps are to help show the missing tools etc. and although I have an Aber set the latter is far too complex and drives me mad every time I try and make a clamp. These babies are all one piece and when I've used them before were the simplest and most effective PE I think you can get to replicate this important but annoying part of German ww2 builds!



Some more resin now, all from Tank workshop. The hubs on the left will allow me to show missing road wheels and will complement the Voyager wheels well. The radiator and cooling fan inserts will fill the void under the rear engine grills (but are probably totally unnecessary!) and in the middle the transmission is for something a bit different and will be used to show a spare transmission tied down on the engine deck as if salvaged from another tank but not yet fitted during a hasty retreat. Should be a nice touch and hep indicate that this is a tired old AFV! I got the idea from a build Steve Zaloga did years ago of a T-34 1940.

Finally we have a crew:



Can't beat Alpine figures - simply beautiful sculpting and casting. I hadn't seen these guys before but they are a great pair and perfect for the build - a nice veteran crew. I just hope I can do them justice!

Ok that's all for now, Love to hear your thoughts and questions, I hope to have some progress up very soon......

Cheers,

James
Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Monday, June 16, 2014 - 11:55 PM UTC

That is a fascinating photo that I don't recall seeing before.
The turret of this Tiger is unquestionably not the one it was issued with. It's an "initial" turret with no escape hatch, but it has been upgraded with spare track hangers.

The hull is numbered 250202 or similar, so we know that it dated from April 1943 and what features it has.

Your Tamiya kit is problematic as a depiction of an Africa Tiger. The hull roof is wrong and the Feifel tubes are crude. But, if you want to model THIS wreck, the kit has a useful mix of the parts you need.

I can list the exact features of that Tiger if you want.

David
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 - 01:20 PM UTC

Quoted Text


That is a fascinating photo that I don't recall seeing before.
The turret of this Tiger is unquestionably not the one it was issued with. It's an "initial" turret with no escape hatch, but it has been upgraded with spare track hangers.

The hull is numbered 250202 or similar, so we know that it dated from April 1943 and what features it has.

Your Tamiya kit is problematic as a depiction of an Africa Tiger. The hull roof is wrong and the Feifel tubes are crude. But, if you want to model THIS wreck, the kit has a useful mix of the parts you need.

I can list the exact features of that Tiger if you want.

David



Hi David, really appreciate your comments.

I must say that your site has been a huge help so far, thanks for putting together such an exhaustive amount of info on this interesting vehicle.

Glad the photo is of interest, I wish I could remember where I found it.
Yes I totally forgot about the serial number on the glacis, I'd definitely say it begins 25020 but the last digit isn't clear, however it narrows it down a lot.

Interesting that it makes it a 'hybrid', I wasn't intending to model this vehicle in particular (just using it to show that my build is within the realms of reality) but would be interested to understand more about it if possible.

I had used your site to look at the kit fixes for this kit, what is the issue with the hull roof? Do you mean if using for an April 1943 version?
I will not be using the feifel filters and will show the kit as if they have been removed so now worries there.

Be very interested to hear more of your thoughts on the Tiger in the pic and on my build as it progresses.

Cheers,

James





Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 - 08:08 PM UTC
Tamiya's hull roof is not right for an Africa "501" Tiger, that's all. It has the S-mine bases installed, and the cables are moved because of that. It's basically the roof of the Bovington Tiger from February 1943. They also used the extended hull front edges.
Really, with all the research we have done by now, there is a need for somebody to release a correct Africa Tiger and make this kit go away.

But you can use it to make a plausible Tiger similar to what's in the photo.

The turret would have;
- Two pistol ports, no side hatch.
- No periscope on the right side roof (Tamiya provide the wrong kind, part F42, anyway).
- Spare track hangers on the turret. 5 on the left, 2 on the right. Watch the spacing. If you don't include spare track links, you should make the bottom holders which Tamiya don't provide.
- No smoke launchers. But these USED to be present. They have been cut off, leaving 2 welded tabs on the turret roof. You have some cutting to do there.
- The mantlet could be either kind as provided by Tamiya, probably E11.
- The submersion cover, F33, would be discarded long ago.
- The original turret bin is problematic, because we don't know which one it was. Most likely it was the wide type, which Tamiya provide in the Africa kit. But it would have 4 latches, not 2 as the kit depicts. Also, Tamiya's Africa bin is significantly undersized. You might be happier to represent the tank without any turret bin, which will require you to cut off those tabs at the back of the turret.

I will talk about the hull later.

David
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Friday, June 20, 2014 - 12:58 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Tamiya's hull roof is not right for an Africa "501" Tiger, that's all. It has the S-mine bases installed, and the cables are moved because of that. It's basically the roof of the Bovington Tiger from February 1943. They also used the extended hull front edges.
Really, with all the research we have done by now, there is a need for somebody to release a correct Africa Tiger and make this kit go away.

But you can use it to make a plausible Tiger similar to what's in the photo.

The turret would have;
- Two pistol ports, no side hatch.
- No periscope on the right side roof (Tamiya provide the wrong kind, part F42, anyway).
- Spare track hangers on the turret. 5 on the left, 2 on the right. Watch the spacing. If you don't include spare track links, you should make the bottom holders which Tamiya don't provide.
- No smoke launchers. But these USED to be present. They have been cut off, leaving 2 welded tabs on the turret roof. You have some cutting to do there.
- The mantlet could be either kind as provided by Tamiya, probably E11.
- The submersion cover, F33, would be discarded long ago.
- The original turret bin is problematic, because we don't know which one it was. Most likely it was the wide type, which Tamiya provide in the Africa kit. But it would have 4 latches, not 2 as the kit depicts. Also, Tamiya's Africa bin is significantly undersized. You might be happier to represent the tank without any turret bin, which will require you to cut off those tabs at the back of the turret.

I will talk about the hull later.

David



Hi David, Thanks for the additional info. Yes, having read the kit fixes in your site I'm aware of the S-Mine mounting points and already have removed them from my kit. Therefore I'll stick with 'Plan A' and model it as an initial (hull and turret) although in hindsight it would have been nice to have gone down the Hybrid route..... never mind!

Regarding the front hull edges, I've been using the photo on your site to try and correct this part, but i'm struggling to get the shape right. The reference books I have don't have any clear pics I can find and the internet hasn't turned up too much either. Do you have any clearer pics of this area? I'm under the belief that Tiger 712 has these front edges, but can't find any walkaround pics of this tank either......

Any help would be much appreciated.

Cheers,

James
Homer0331
Visit this Community
Missouri, United States
Joined: March 19, 2014
KitMaker: 148 posts
Armorama: 148 posts
Posted: Friday, June 20, 2014 - 01:06 PM UTC
I'm looking forward to this build. That's quite the assemblage of spare parts there!

Question for David.

Is it possible then that this Tamiya kit would be fairly accurate for a 504 Tiger such as old 131?

Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Friday, June 20, 2014 - 01:27 PM UTC
Ok, about time I showed you some progress, Apologies for the delay, had a crazy busy week between work and buying a house!

So....
I always try and start on the running gear as I find this the most 'boring' part of a build and so try an tackle early on while I'm still very keen on the kit.
Being a Tamiya kit this is fairly easy as the parts go together very well and require minimal cleanup.

Sprockets and idlers:

I've used the later sprocket type as if these were replacements during the course of this Tigers 'career'.

I also tackled one side of the road wheels:

Flippin' 'eck these things had a lot of wheels! I intend to not use them all and will incorporate the voyager wheels and TWS hubs into the 'mix' on the outer layers, however I'm finding it very difficult to plan all this when there is nothing holding the wheels solidly to the axles. You have to balance them all on which is not a very useful solution. I've thought about blu-tac or even tiny amounts of CA glue, but I don't want to glue them on permanently as I'd like to paint the wheels separately. Any Tiger veterans out there that can offer me some advice please?

I forgot to list these in the aftermarket selection earlier but I also have AFV clubs late version rubber band tracks as these would no doubt be fitted at this stage of the war. Why rubber band? Well for a vehicle with suspension like this the benefits of indy links are minimal to the look of the final build, and personally I find them extremely tedious to put together, generally a killer of builds for me, so took the easier option.

Having first tried regular plastic cement, I then read the packaging and saw you need to fix these with CA glue, which is in process as the photo was taken. It took a couple of goes to get a nice join but they look pretty good now.

So moving onto the hull:

This all went together very easily...


As you can see I've filled (but not yet sanded) the mounts for the mud guards and the track fixing cable as I'm trying to represent a very early model where these were not mounted. Also note the sink mark along the hull side in the latter photo, I've fixed this now but tut,tut Tamiya!

I also tackled the rear glacis plate:

This generally involved filling a lot of mounting holes, which I won't be using, adding to the 'simple' look of the tank. I've left the feifel mounts (although won't mount the air cleaners themselves) as they may have been added to this initial later and I need to use the corresponding engine deck intake part as the kit doesn't provide an alternative. I also drilled out the towing eye.

Also in this area I tackled the exhausts:

These are built of two parts and some sanding and filling is needed to get a clean join, although I'd guess the armoured covers would hide most of it when installed.

Ok, that's all for now, please let me know what you think, and I'd also love to hear some suggestions for how to balance all those roadwheels on their suspension arms semi-permanently!

Cheers,

James
Tanksami
Visit this Community
Victoria, Australia
Joined: August 06, 2011
KitMaker: 1,314 posts
Armorama: 1,217 posts
Posted: Friday, June 20, 2014 - 01:41 PM UTC
Hi James,

I will keep an eye on this little tiger cub!!

Have you thought about maybe using white glue / pva, as you could then take it apart later on?? Personially I have never done it but have heard that you can then sit them in warm water to help "break" the glue back down.

Cheers Mike

p.s congrats on the new house too
Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Friday, June 20, 2014 - 04:41 PM UTC

Quoted Text



Is it possible then that this Tamiya kit would be fairly accurate for a 504 Tiger such as old 131?




Tamiya's other Early Tiger was based on 131, then they added a sprue of "Africa" parts to make this one, so you'd basically be discarding almost all of that sprue. The gun mantlet would be useful for 131, which was unusual in having the old flat style. Otherwise, you might as well get the other kit.

David
Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Friday, June 20, 2014 - 04:47 PM UTC
James;

To leave off the mud guards and track cable, implies a very early Tiger, one of just 9 used at Leningrad. They didn't have Feifels. Just letting you know.

All Tigers of 501 in Africa, plus some later Tigers, had the same cut-down front hull edges. I don't have many great photos of it, so I hope these help.






David
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Friday, June 20, 2014 - 10:23 PM UTC

Quoted Text

I'm looking forward to this build. That's quite the assemblage of spare parts there!

Question for David.

Is it possible then that this Tamiya kit would be fairly accurate for a 504 Tiger such as old 131?




Hey Ian,

Must have snuck in between my other posts there!

Great to have you on board mate. Yes I am a sucker for aftermarket, my builds always have to be different, never OOTB!

Look forward to seeing what you think of the progress mate,

James

Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Friday, June 20, 2014 - 10:26 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Hi James,

I will keep an eye on this little tiger cub!!

Have you thought about maybe using white glue / pva, as you could then take it apart later on?? Personially I have never done it but have heard that you can then sit them in warm water to help "break" the glue back down.

Cheers Mike

p.s congrats on the new house too



Thanks mate!

Good to have you on board, hows things your end?
PVA, that's an interesting idea, I may experiment tonight.

Cheers mate!

James
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Friday, June 20, 2014 - 10:34 PM UTC

Quoted Text

James;

To leave off the mud guards and track cable, implies a very early Tiger, one of just 9 used at Leningrad. They didn't have Feifels. Just letting you know.

All Tigers of 501 in Africa, plus some later Tigers, had the same cut-down front hull edges. I don't have many great photos of it, so I hope these help.

David



Hey David,

Thanks so much for the pics, certainly the best examples I've seen and will really help.
Yes, I'm aware I'm heading into very unrealistic territory that one of those Leningrad tigers survived this long, if I use the Voyager turret bins I've bought then I'm probably seriously pushing my luck! However, I'm claiming artistic license in that sense for the build while still trying to accurately portray the features of this tiger as best I can.

As my previous post, if I omit the Feifel mounts I will need to replace the air intake on the engine hatch, which I believe was missing on these early Tigers? Therefore I'm claiming, Feifel's were retrofitted later on in this tanks life.

I know, I know, really pushing the limits, but still within the realms of possibility.........?

James
Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Friday, June 20, 2014 - 11:06 PM UTC
The Voyager bins were custom-made for one single Tiger, which ended up in Russian hands in January 1943.

I haven't noticed the Feifels added to any Tiger retrospectively. Upgrades and retrofits begin to appear in late 1943, by which time Feifels were not in use.

The engine panel for those Initials had a simple rectangular panel to seal it.

Yes, you're heading into a sort of what-if territory, but it's not outlandish. One of those Initial Tigers was still operating in late 1943. Suppose it had survived a few more months; they could easily have put the Late tracks on it.

David
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 21, 2014 - 02:40 PM UTC

Quoted Text

The Voyager bins were custom-made for one single Tiger, which ended up in Russian hands in January 1943.

I haven't noticed the Feifels added to any Tiger retrospectively. Upgrades and retrofits begin to appear in late 1943, by which time Feifels were not in use.

The engine panel for those Initials had a simple rectangular panel to seal it.

Yes, you're heading into a sort of what-if territory, but it's not outlandish. One of those Initial Tigers was still operating in late 1943. Suppose it had survived a few more months; they could easily have put the Late tracks on it.

David



Hey David,

Initially (no pun intended!) I didn't intend to venture so far down the 'what-if' pathway with this one, but it was one of those builds where the idea came first and then the research followed. Perhaps not the most logical way to pursue a build but oh well.
As for the feifels, I may reconsider, if I can modify the engine deck hatch easily enough, but already have progressed this area to a point that may make that very difficult; I will see. If I can backdate that then the Feifel mounts will be easy to remove.

Yes as I understand it the bins are specific to Tiger 100, of those leningrad Tigers, on purchase I didn't realise how specific. I'm still not 100% on if I'll use them, but will perhaps let my soldering skills decide this one!
Is the initial you mention the one on Italy? IIRC the only one to return from the Sicilian campaign, and had a panzer III turret bin.

So to summarise, the chances of my Tiger existing are essentially 0, bummer. In retrospect I wish I'd posted that pic first and modelled the initial/early hybrid. Too late now so I'll strive on under the artistic licence banner! Lets hope it looks good enough to justify it!

Cheers David,

James
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 21, 2014 - 02:43 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Have you thought about maybe using white glue / pva, as you could then take it apart later on?? Personially I have never done it but have heard that you can then sit them in warm water to help "break" the glue back down.

Cheers Mike



Mike,

Tried this last night and it seems to be working, cheers mate!
The PVA is taking a while to set and probably won't hold up to heavy handling, but will certainly work for the purposes of planning the wheel placement and for getting accurate positioning on the base (yep I'll be mounting this one on a small vignette base).

Thanks for the tip!

James
Tanksami
Visit this Community
Victoria, Australia
Joined: August 06, 2011
KitMaker: 1,314 posts
Armorama: 1,217 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 21, 2014 - 03:14 PM UTC
Hi James,

Very glad to hear that the pva is working,I will remember that for future use as well.

Things are good at my end thanks for asking the hand is nearly normal


I watched the game last night you guy's will sure be a force next year, I am thinking.

Cheers Mike
Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 21, 2014 - 06:44 PM UTC
James;

This is the only Initial surviving in mid 1943, still operating near Leningrad.



The tool layout on these guys, top and rear, was unlike the Tamiya kit.

Really, it's by leaving the stuff off the sides that you put the model into "unlikely" territory.

Have fun!

David
spitfire303
Visit this Community
Vendee, France
Joined: December 22, 2006
KitMaker: 1,437 posts
Armorama: 1,406 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 21, 2014 - 09:48 PM UTC
Hi James,

Very happy see you starting your this blog. I'm sure it will be another great project of yours. The tiger I is a great modelling subject. In your hands it will surely be a masterpiece. Good info on the eduard's pe clamps. I must take a closer look on it. I wait to see more.

Cheers

Spit
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 22, 2014 - 02:27 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Hi James,

Very glad to hear that the pva is working,I will remember that for future use as well.

Things are good at my end thanks for asking the hand is nearly normal


I watched the game last night you guy's will sure be a force next year, I am thinking.

Cheers Mike



Glad to hear mate, hope you make a full recovery soon as I'd be keen to see some more progress on your T-55.

I hope so, unfortunately didn't manage to perform as well in the last game I think, but you kiwis know your rugby that's for sure!

James
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 22, 2014 - 02:36 PM UTC

Quoted Text

James;

This is the only Initial surviving in mid 1943, still operating near Leningrad.

The tool layout on these guys, top and rear, was unlike the Tamiya kit.

Really, it's by leaving the stuff off the sides that you put the model into "unlikely" territory.

Have fun!

David



Cheers David,

Yes I'm aware tool layout will need to be different, still not 100% on how I'll tackle this yet....

I know the vehicle you mean, this one has the field modified exhaust extensions.

Are you familiar with the Tiger on this page?

[url=http://ww2images.blogspot.com.au/Children Playing with a Tiger in Italy[/url]
I'm not sure if the turret stowage bin is a good giveaway (I'm sure you're expert eye will know better) but this looks like an initial in Italy in 1943?

Cheers,

James
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 22, 2014 - 02:37 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Hi James,

Very happy see you starting your this blog. I'm sure it will be another great project of yours. The tiger I is a great modelling subject. In your hands it will surely be a masterpiece. Good info on the eduard's pe clamps. I must take a closer look on it. I wait to see more.

Cheers

Spit



Hey Pawel,

Thanks mate, appreciate you looking in. I hope I can live up to your high expectations!

Cheers,

James
Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 22, 2014 - 07:25 PM UTC

Quoted Text


looks like an initial in Italy in 1943?

Cheers,

James






That is Tiger 222 of s.Pz.Abt. 503 and it fought on the Eastern front.

In that photo it's at the Palais Rohan Strasbourg France according to the researchers at TIIF,DE. We don't know why.

This tank doesn't have bare sides like you're building into your model. The welded mouning points along the side tell use that it once had a cable and mudguards there. These were the bent-line mudguards provided in the Tamiya Africa kit.

The hull roof is also similar to African Tigers, which unfortunately Tamiya didn't provide. There is no provision for S-mines.

As for the turret; it has a Pz.3 bin, so we would expect it to have no side hatch. But there is a photo taken from the other side in which it does seem to have the hatch! This battalion had plenty of Tigers and they tended to mix them up, so we can't rule that out.

David
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - 06:53 PM UTC

Quoted Text



That is Tiger 222 of s.Pz.Abt. 503 and it fought on the Eastern front.

In that photo it's at the Palais Rohan Strasbourg France according to the researchers at TIIF,DE. We don't know why.

This tank doesn't have bare sides like you're building into your model. The welded mouning points along the side tell use that it once had a cable and mudguards there. These were the bent-line mudguards provided in the Tamiya Africa kit.

The hull roof is also similar to African Tigers, which unfortunately Tamiya didn't provide. There is no provision for S-mines.

As for the turret; it has a Pz.3 bin, so we would expect it to have no side hatch. But there is a photo taken from the other side in which it does seem to have the hatch! This battalion had plenty of Tigers and they tended to mix them up, so we can't rule that out.

David



Hi David,

Yes I was simply using this as an example of a surviving initial model, although if it has the turret escape hatch then that certainly is a bit different, replacement turret maybe? - Another Hybrid perhaps?

James

Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - 07:48 PM UTC
If it has the hatch, then the 503 battalion must have swapped turrets. I'm hoping a better photo of this Tiger will come to light.

David
 _GOTOTOP