Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
News
Takom: Tadpole Coming SoonPosted: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 - 01:58 AM UTC
An announcement from Takom has another great looking and must have World War 1 tank coming soon.
Read the Full News Story
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Beastmaster
United Kingdom
Joined: January 27, 2009
KitMaker: 592 posts
Armorama: 588 posts
Joined: January 27, 2009
KitMaker: 592 posts
Armorama: 588 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 - 06:05 AM UTC
Now that's what I like to see!
Posted: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 - 06:38 AM UTC
Good to see another new WW1 tank coming into production.
Al
Al
modelcellar
United States
Joined: July 22, 2008
KitMaker: 75 posts
Armorama: 21 posts
Joined: July 22, 2008
KitMaker: 75 posts
Armorama: 21 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 - 09:51 AM UTC
That's really COOL! I'm sure our 1/35 WWI Infantry will look great advancing alongside this BEAST!!
Paul
www.ModelCellar.com
Paul
www.ModelCellar.com
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 21, 2014 - 02:48 AM UTC
How effective was a mortar mounted like that? The mortar crew or commander doesn't have a clear view to the front and they are situated very close to the exposed tracks. And when the vehicle is in motion all the movement would prevent any accuracy of fire. Stopping to fire would only make them a sitting target.
ianclasper
Washington, United States
Joined: September 02, 2009
KitMaker: 227 posts
Armorama: 141 posts
Joined: September 02, 2009
KitMaker: 227 posts
Armorama: 141 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 21, 2014 - 04:16 AM UTC
Why the Tadpole? It was an experimental concept to cross trenches that was never deployed. Although I welcome any WW1 tank model, we really need the Mk I and Mk V
Beastmaster
United Kingdom
Joined: January 27, 2009
KitMaker: 592 posts
Armorama: 588 posts
Joined: January 27, 2009
KitMaker: 592 posts
Armorama: 588 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 21, 2014 - 05:37 AM UTC
Quoted Text
How effective was a mortar mounted like that? The mortar crew or commander doesn't have a clear view to the front and they are situated very close to the exposed tracks. And when the vehicle is in motion all the movement would prevent any accuracy of fire. Stopping to fire would only make them a sitting target.
Probably not very effective and possibly a bit dangerous at times too.
Beastmaster
United Kingdom
Joined: January 27, 2009
KitMaker: 592 posts
Armorama: 588 posts
Joined: January 27, 2009
KitMaker: 592 posts
Armorama: 588 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 21, 2014 - 05:41 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Why the Tadpole? It was an experimental concept to cross trenches that was never deployed. Although I welcome any WW1 tank model, we really need the Mk I and Mk V
Sacrilage man! We need a MkI and V yes but a Tadpole had to happen.
It might never have been deployed but that doesn't matter as it's still a part of WW1 tank history.
ironhull
Venezia, Italy
Joined: November 23, 2013
KitMaker: 134 posts
Armorama: 134 posts
Joined: November 23, 2013
KitMaker: 134 posts
Armorama: 134 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 21, 2014 - 06:47 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Why the Tadpole? It was an experimental concept to cross trenches that was never deployed. Although I welcome any WW1 tank model, we really need the Mk I and Mk V
If you have a MK IV you can add only some parts to obtain a Tadpole and it seems people love this tank. A very easy way to make some money for Takom.
Following this way and looking how Takom splits sponson parts, the next easy version to obtain may be a Supply Tank. It needs new closed sponsons (only three parts to modify on each sponson), an hatch over driver cab (two parts, may be three) and some decals.
Mk I and V were very different from Mk IV.
Ciao
Pierantonio
cdharwins
New Jersey, United States
Joined: October 28, 2006
KitMaker: 491 posts
Armorama: 462 posts
Joined: October 28, 2006
KitMaker: 491 posts
Armorama: 462 posts
Posted: Friday, August 22, 2014 - 12:10 AM UTC
No complaints from me! I'll get one. KEEP THEM COMING!
C_JACQUEMONT
Loire-Atlantique, France
Joined: October 09, 2004
KitMaker: 2,433 posts
Armorama: 2,325 posts
Joined: October 09, 2004
KitMaker: 2,433 posts
Armorama: 2,325 posts
Posted: Friday, August 22, 2014 - 01:40 AM UTC
I agree about the prototype limited appeal BUT this makes a very impressive model. I built the Emhar Tadpole recently and it got more attention on display (in a local hobby shops) than other models, just so unique and big!
Not sure I'd buy another one though...
Cheers,
Christophe
Not sure I'd buy another one though...
Cheers,
Christophe
armorfaust
United States
Joined: November 19, 2014
KitMaker: 4 posts
Armorama: 4 posts
Joined: November 19, 2014
KitMaker: 4 posts
Armorama: 4 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 29, 2014 - 11:49 PM UTC
I hope we get a A7V
PantherF
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 30, 2014 - 05:41 AM UTC
I want them ALL!
But, the Tadpole will be a good start!
Jeff
But, the Tadpole will be a good start!
Jeff
Beastmaster
United Kingdom
Joined: January 27, 2009
KitMaker: 592 posts
Armorama: 588 posts
Joined: January 27, 2009
KitMaker: 592 posts
Armorama: 588 posts
Posted: Monday, December 01, 2014 - 05:18 AM UTC
Looking forward to the Tadpole but I wonder if we'll see any more WW1 tanks before the Centenary year's out?
The Hobbyboss Schneider should be out soon but obviously there's the Whippet, A7V and MkVIII Liberty tank too that could be done.
The Hobbyboss Schneider should be out soon but obviously there's the Whippet, A7V and MkVIII Liberty tank too that could be done.
KenLawrence
Vendor
California, United States
Joined: December 14, 2002
KitMaker: 123 posts
Armorama: 116 posts
Joined: December 14, 2002
KitMaker: 123 posts
Armorama: 116 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 - 09:06 PM UTC
Greetings,
NEW ITEMS NOW ON THE WATER! ETA OAKLAND 12/15.
Takom's new 1:35 British MK.IV "Hemophrodite" tank(TAK 35 2010), MK.IV Track Link set(TAK 35 2008X), MK.IV "Tadpole" tank(TAK 35015), Modern German T3 Transporter Bus(TAK 35 2013), T3 Truck(TAK 35 2014), and re-stock of Canadian Leopard C2 w/MEXAS armor. KITTYHAWK'S New 1:32 U.S. OV-10D "Bronco"(KH 32003) and 1:48 SAAB JAS 39B/D(PH 80118). Panda Hobby's new 1:35 M-ATV MRAP w/CROW II and RWS(PH 35007)and Orochi's new Standard 1:35 M3A3 "Bradley" CFV(ORO 35002).
If you have a favorite hobby shop, we encourage you to ask them to order these from us for you. If you don't you can order from us at: www.pacmodels.com. Thanks and
Best Regards,
Ken & Mary Ellen Lawrence
Pacific Coast Models, Inc. [email protected]
NEW ITEMS NOW ON THE WATER! ETA OAKLAND 12/15.
Takom's new 1:35 British MK.IV "Hemophrodite" tank(TAK 35 2010), MK.IV Track Link set(TAK 35 2008X), MK.IV "Tadpole" tank(TAK 35015), Modern German T3 Transporter Bus(TAK 35 2013), T3 Truck(TAK 35 2014), and re-stock of Canadian Leopard C2 w/MEXAS armor. KITTYHAWK'S New 1:32 U.S. OV-10D "Bronco"(KH 32003) and 1:48 SAAB JAS 39B/D(PH 80118). Panda Hobby's new 1:35 M-ATV MRAP w/CROW II and RWS(PH 35007)and Orochi's new Standard 1:35 M3A3 "Bradley" CFV(ORO 35002).
If you have a favorite hobby shop, we encourage you to ask them to order these from us for you. If you don't you can order from us at: www.pacmodels.com. Thanks and
Best Regards,
Ken & Mary Ellen Lawrence
Pacific Coast Models, Inc. [email protected]