Hi all,
I am wondering if anyone could tell me which company made T54E1 sherman tracks that were fitted to D-Day sherman tanks? Were these tracks mostly fitted to British shermans? The only ones I've seen that participated in D-Day are at the Musee des Epaves Sous Marines in Port en Bessin, Normandy, and were fitted on DD Shermans, which I believe were British-manufactured?
Would T54E1 tracks on a regular (non-DD)American M4A1 from D-day be accurate?
Thanks!
Hosted by Darren Baker
who made T54E1 sherman tracks?
Vierville
Gauteng, South Africa
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Posted: Friday, November 06, 2015 - 04:42 PM UTC
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Friday, November 06, 2015 - 05:33 PM UTC
The Truscon company made the T54E1 tracks -- and it was a very common track seen on the M4A3 and some M4A1s. Only six M4A3s were sent to the British so NO, these tracks weren't so common on UK operated Shermans.
Tracks were inter-changeable and appeared on Shermans and Sherman variants as they were shipped to the assembly plants.
The DD fixtures were made by the British -- all Shermans were US-made. Could they be seen on non-DD M4A1s? Possible (and you can't prove a negative) -- but at that time the T48 was very commonly seen on M4A1s. Your best bet would be to find a photo and match it according.
Panda Plastics makes aftermarket 1/35 injection plastic T54E1s.
Tracks were inter-changeable and appeared on Shermans and Sherman variants as they were shipped to the assembly plants.
The DD fixtures were made by the British -- all Shermans were US-made. Could they be seen on non-DD M4A1s? Possible (and you can't prove a negative) -- but at that time the T48 was very commonly seen on M4A1s. Your best bet would be to find a photo and match it according.
Panda Plastics makes aftermarket 1/35 injection plastic T54E1s.
OldWarloke
United States
Joined: October 14, 2012
KitMaker: 2,663 posts
Armorama: 2,649 posts
Joined: October 14, 2012
KitMaker: 2,663 posts
Armorama: 2,649 posts
Posted: Friday, November 06, 2015 - 05:45 PM UTC
Here are a couple of other companies that make this after market track.
Bronco Models #AB3546
Model Kasten #SK45
I have them both, I think the Model Kasten are nicer.
They both are available from Sprue Brothers.
Regards.
Donald
Bronco Models #AB3546
Model Kasten #SK45
I have them both, I think the Model Kasten are nicer.
They both are available from Sprue Brothers.
Regards.
Donald
Cantstopbuyingkits
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Friday, November 06, 2015 - 07:44 PM UTC
Friulmodel also does a set but the Sherman used live tracks so doesn't really play to the strengths of the white metal material.
Vierville
Gauteng, South Africa
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 07, 2015 - 12:13 AM UTC
Thanks everyone! I'm doing a standard M4A1 (of the 743rd Tank Batalion, D-Day),and all photos I've found so far point toward only the DD tanks using the T54E1s, so I think I'll go with the T48 tracks.
I've got a set of Bronco tracks but they seem exceptionally fiddly to work with, so I think I'll probably get a set of the Friul tracks and just ensure they are tensioned correctly to be tight enough on top.The Friuls seem far easier to work with (for me as a novice tank modeler!).
I've got a set of Bronco tracks but they seem exceptionally fiddly to work with, so I think I'll probably get a set of the Friul tracks and just ensure they are tensioned correctly to be tight enough on top.The Friuls seem far easier to work with (for me as a novice tank modeler!).
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 07, 2015 - 12:19 AM UTC
Don't use the Fruils. While it might be easier to work with now, over time, their weightiness creates sag -- which is inaccurate for Sherman tracks.
Vierville
Gauteng, South Africa
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 07, 2015 - 02:29 PM UTC
Thanks for the advice! If I may ask, would this sag still happen if I were to glue the track in place on the rollers to maintain tension? I don't want the track to be workable so losing that aspect is not a problem.
Posted: Sunday, November 08, 2015 - 10:59 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Thanks for the advice! If I may ask, would this sag still happen if I were to glue the track in place on the rollers to maintain tension?
Generally yes. The joints in the Fruil track can stretch just a little and that's all you need to get the sag. Plus, being heavier, it's harder than you might think to get them tight enough when gluing so that there is no sag to begin with.
Paul
marcb
Overijssel, Netherlands
Joined: March 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,244 posts
Armorama: 1,226 posts
Joined: March 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,244 posts
Armorama: 1,226 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 08, 2015 - 11:47 PM UTC
Very usefull info!
I was planning to use Friuls for the all metal variants, but after reading about the difficulties in getting them to fit tight, I'll go for plastic ones. Probably Panda tracks.
I was planning to use Friuls for the all metal variants, but after reading about the difficulties in getting them to fit tight, I'll go for plastic ones. Probably Panda tracks.