Hello friends,
Here is the point. I've got a friend of mine who is auctioneer at Drouot. She requested my help to identify WW2 allied vehicles from drawings from a french graphic designer. I could identify some but some I have never seen before.
So I thought I could submit those to the armorama folks sagacity. Could you please help me to identify those ? I would very grateful if you could.
ps: I'm not paid for that, she's a friend of mine.
Best,
Julien
Hosted by Darren Baker
please help me to identify WW2 US vehicules
Kinggeorges
Barcelona, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: August 31, 2005
KitMaker: 1,380 posts
Armorama: 845 posts
Joined: August 31, 2005
KitMaker: 1,380 posts
Armorama: 845 posts
Posted: Monday, March 21, 2016 - 10:22 PM UTC
russamotto
Utah, United States
Joined: December 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,389 posts
Armorama: 2,054 posts
Joined: December 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,389 posts
Armorama: 2,054 posts
Posted: Monday, March 21, 2016 - 10:42 PM UTC
Jeep, DUKW, Jeep variations, WC 51, WC 63, Dodge WC-6, WC-18 1/2 ton ambulance, what looks like a postwar Dodge truck, WC 53 carryall, Bantam 4x4 in British service, early Ford GP (?), WC 54, soviet "jeep" (cant recall the name right now), WC-18 postwar paint or similar 1/2 ton radio truck, and a collection of what looks like spitfires. Hope I got those right.
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Monday, March 21, 2016 - 11:43 PM UTC
The last red truck is a converted Dodge WC-54 ambulance (or maybe an ex-Signal Corps truck).
The jeep just above is a Bantam (BRC-60 ?). The ambulance above is a Dodge WC-64 KD.The two jeeps above are early models : the one with "109" on the bumper is a Ford GP and the other one looks like a Bantam BRC. The yellow truck is a Dodge WC-53 Carryall. The blue truck is a postwar Dodge Power Wagon. The one above is a WC-54. The light truck above is a IHC M-3-4.
I leave the Spitfire variants ID to the wingy-thingy experts
H.P.
The jeep just above is a Bantam (BRC-60 ?). The ambulance above is a Dodge WC-64 KD.The two jeeps above are early models : the one with "109" on the bumper is a Ford GP and the other one looks like a Bantam BRC. The yellow truck is a Dodge WC-53 Carryall. The blue truck is a postwar Dodge Power Wagon. The one above is a WC-54. The light truck above is a IHC M-3-4.
I leave the Spitfire variants ID to the wingy-thingy experts
H.P.
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - 12:40 AM UTC
1st 4 images: Willys Jeep
next 4 images: DUKW 6x6 Amphibian truck
"Commando Jeep" Willys Jeep outfitted for special duties, Operation Market Garden
Yellow Checkered Willys Jeep: used on airfields to guide taxiing aircraft
Armored jeep: Willys Jeep of 82nd Airborne
WC 51 3/4 ton Dodge Weapon Carrier
WC-63 1.5 ton Dodge Cargo truck
CCKW 353 GMC 2.5 ton truck
WC-4 Dodge prime mover (pre-war)
WC-54 Dodge ambulance
Dodge Power Wagon, commercial
WC-56 Dodge Carryall
Bantam Jeep BRC-40
Ford GP early jeep with cut-down steering wheel for air transport purposes
WC-64 KD Dodge Ambulance
unknown -- Soviet jeep?
WC-54 Dodge Ambulance re-configured for non medical role
I can't comment on the Spitfires, either
I disagree with Henri-Pierre. I see no IHC M-3-4 light trucks. I also disagree with Russ' WC-18s. Both are WC-54s (note the straight radiator grilles).
next 4 images: DUKW 6x6 Amphibian truck
"Commando Jeep" Willys Jeep outfitted for special duties, Operation Market Garden
Yellow Checkered Willys Jeep: used on airfields to guide taxiing aircraft
Armored jeep: Willys Jeep of 82nd Airborne
WC 51 3/4 ton Dodge Weapon Carrier
WC-63 1.5 ton Dodge Cargo truck
CCKW 353 GMC 2.5 ton truck
WC-4 Dodge prime mover (pre-war)
WC-54 Dodge ambulance
Dodge Power Wagon, commercial
WC-56 Dodge Carryall
Bantam Jeep BRC-40
Ford GP early jeep with cut-down steering wheel for air transport purposes
WC-64 KD Dodge Ambulance
unknown -- Soviet jeep?
WC-54 Dodge Ambulance re-configured for non medical role
I can't comment on the Spitfires, either
I disagree with Henri-Pierre. I see no IHC M-3-4 light trucks. I also disagree with Russ' WC-18s. Both are WC-54s (note the straight radiator grilles).
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - 01:56 AM UTC
I stand corrected Roy. I've just realized it was a Dodge, but you've beaten me to it
Here's a picture of a 1940 Bantam BRC-60 :
from http://cj3b.info/Poster/BRC60.html
H.P.
Here's a picture of a 1940 Bantam BRC-60 :
from http://cj3b.info/Poster/BRC60.html
H.P.
brekinapez
Georgia, United States
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - 03:16 AM UTC
For the Spitfires we have, from top to bottom:
Mk I
Mk Vb
Mk Vc
Mk VIII
Mk XVIII
Mk XIX
Mk IX
Mk XVIII
Mk IX
That said, I am no Spitfire expert but I think I am close.
Mk I
Mk Vb
Mk Vc
Mk VIII
Mk XVIII
Mk XIX
Mk IX
Mk XVIII
Mk IX
That said, I am no Spitfire expert but I think I am close.
Kinggeorges
Barcelona, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: August 31, 2005
KitMaker: 1,380 posts
Armorama: 845 posts
Joined: August 31, 2005
KitMaker: 1,380 posts
Armorama: 845 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - 03:08 PM UTC
Russ, Roy and Henri Pierre, thank you so much, you did a superb job and you were very fast in doing so.
Shell, you dare not to call yourself a Spitfire expert ?? Dude they all looked the same to me until you made your post. Thanks a lot for your precious help.
Many thanks again
Julien
Shell, you dare not to call yourself a Spitfire expert ?? Dude they all looked the same to me until you made your post. Thanks a lot for your precious help.
Many thanks again
Julien
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - 04:27 PM UTC
Quoted Text
For the Spitfires we have, from top to bottom:
Mk I
Mk Vb
Mk Vc
Mk VIII
Mk XVIII
Mk XIX
Mk IX
Mk XVIII
Mk IX
That said, I am no Spitfire expert but I think I am close.
You took the words right out of my mouth!
Pity that there are no P-47s, P-51s, P-38s, B-17s, B-24s, B-25s, B-26s, A-20s, A-26s, C-47s, C-46s, C-54s, Hurricanes, Typhoons, Tempests, Mosquitoes, Lancasters, Wellingtons, Halifax', Blenheims, Beauforts, and Beaufighters in the grouping of aircraft illustrations. Or any Luftwaffe aircraft, either...
BTW- That last Spitfire Mk.IXe is a Low-Altitude, "Clipped-Wing"-type. The third "Spit" from the top is a Griffon-engined Mk.XII.
simonking
England - East Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: March 02, 2011
KitMaker: 128 posts
Armorama: 124 posts
Joined: March 02, 2011
KitMaker: 128 posts
Armorama: 124 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - 05:30 PM UTC
The jeep pictures appeared in the Boniface and Jeudy book on the jeep
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - 05:40 PM UTC
Quoted Text
The jeep pictures appeared in the Boniface and Jeudy book on the jeep
Hey now I know why some of these looked familiar
H.P.
WarWheels
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 24, 2006
KitMaker: 1,816 posts
Armorama: 1,402 posts
Joined: March 24, 2006
KitMaker: 1,816 posts
Armorama: 1,402 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - 06:10 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Here's a picture of a 1940 Bantam BRC-60
Based upon my understanding, this vehicle was never officially referred to as the BRC-60. The American Bantam Company referred to the vehicle as the Bantam Mark 2 or "Model 60" Reconnaissance Car. Here's some info on the vehicle at our WarWheels website: http://www.warwheels.net/BantamMark2reconCarIndex.html
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - 06:21 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextHere's a picture of a 1940 Bantam BRC-60
Based upon my understanding, this vehicle was never officially referred to as the BRC-60. The American Bantam Company referred to the vehicle as the Bantam Mark 2 or "Model 60" Reconnaissance Car. Here's some info on the vehicle at our WarWheels website: http://www.warwheels.net/BantamMark2reconCarIndex.html
Thanks for the link Patrick. On a coincidental side note, here's what can be found in David R.Haugh's Bantam BRC data sheet featured on your website "The first set of 70 machines were known as the BRC-60 (or Mark II) and entered service late in 1940"
H.P.
andymacrae
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: September 01, 2005
KitMaker: 409 posts
Armorama: 402 posts
Joined: September 01, 2005
KitMaker: 409 posts
Armorama: 402 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - 09:12 PM UTC
Spitfires from top to bottom:
Mk I
Mk Vb
Mk XII
Mk VIII
FR XVIII
PR XIX
Mk IX
Mk XVIe
Mk LFIX
HTH
Andy
Mk I
Mk Vb
Mk XII
Mk VIII
FR XVIII
PR XIX
Mk IX
Mk XVIe
Mk LFIX
HTH
Andy
brekinapez
Georgia, United States
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 - 05:20 AM UTC
Hey, I did pretty good there considering I've only just started thinking about building any Spits and don't know much beyond the main external differences.
WarWheels
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 24, 2006
KitMaker: 1,816 posts
Armorama: 1,402 posts
Joined: March 24, 2006
KitMaker: 1,816 posts
Armorama: 1,402 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 - 10:55 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Thanks for the link Patrick. On a coincidental side note, here's what can be found in David R.Haugh's Bantam BRC data sheet featured on your website [i]"The first set of 70 machines were known as the BRC-60 (or Mark II) and entered service late in 1940"
Thanks for catching that. We will need to change that as I've found what I consider very reliable info during subsequent research.