What does the very last number(s) in the Maybach engine designation represent ?
eg the '45' in the HL 230 TRM P 45
or the '30' in the HL 230 TRM P 30
This page gives everything but : http://www.alanhamby.com/maybach.shtml
Thanks
Hosted by Darren Baker
Maybach designation question
urumomo
Texas, United States
Joined: August 22, 2013
KitMaker: 675 posts
Armorama: 667 posts
Joined: August 22, 2013
KitMaker: 675 posts
Armorama: 667 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 07, 2016 - 06:53 AM UTC
urumomo
Texas, United States
Joined: August 22, 2013
KitMaker: 675 posts
Armorama: 667 posts
Joined: August 22, 2013
KitMaker: 675 posts
Armorama: 667 posts
Posted: Friday, April 08, 2016 - 07:47 PM UTC
Optimistic fishing Bump
Removed by original poster on 04/09/16 - 22:35:11 (GMT).
ahandykindaguy
Alberta, Canada
Joined: August 20, 2008
KitMaker: 1,295 posts
Armorama: 1,191 posts
Joined: August 20, 2008
KitMaker: 1,295 posts
Armorama: 1,191 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 09, 2016 - 03:40 AM UTC
Not 100 % sure, but since the P designates the engine as a "tank" engine, perhaps the 30 & 45 are the numbers corresponding to the version of the tank engine....ie, the 30th tank engine developed, and the 45th engine developed....
urumomo
Texas, United States
Joined: August 22, 2013
KitMaker: 675 posts
Armorama: 667 posts
Joined: August 22, 2013
KitMaker: 675 posts
Armorama: 667 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 09, 2016 - 08:17 PM UTC
The P 30 was developed from the P 45 so chronologically it appears not .
The P 30 was a cast iron block over-bored to increase the combustion volume
What number would decrease in this event ?
Engine block coolant volume ?
Appears quite incongruent with the gain of 2 liters .
I'm convinced it refers to a specific mechanical characteristic of each engine and not just an administrative designation --
the P30 also had only two carburetors so maybe it refers to something in that side
There used to be a lot of fondness for attaching the design year to things but that certainly doesn't appear to be the case either.
The P 30 was a cast iron block over-bored to increase the combustion volume
What number would decrease in this event ?
Engine block coolant volume ?
Appears quite incongruent with the gain of 2 liters .
I'm convinced it refers to a specific mechanical characteristic of each engine and not just an administrative designation --
the P30 also had only two carburetors so maybe it refers to something in that side
There used to be a lot of fondness for attaching the design year to things but that certainly doesn't appear to be the case either.
Posted: Sunday, April 10, 2016 - 05:05 AM UTC
Not a direct answer to your question, but just a thought -- maybe a Spielberger book can help
urumomo
Texas, United States
Joined: August 22, 2013
KitMaker: 675 posts
Armorama: 667 posts
Joined: August 22, 2013
KitMaker: 675 posts
Armorama: 667 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 10, 2016 - 05:15 AM UTC
not the ones I have , heh heh
The best I can infer from Spielberger's Panther book is the numbers represent the tonnage ranges of the engine ??
The P 30 for panther & P 45 for Tigers .. ?
... he states the P 30 for the Panther produced 30 mteric HP per liter -- but 45 per liter = over 1000 HP ,, so ??
There seems to be very little difference in the two engines though , so I can't see how that tracks ...
( no where near enough for such a power output difference - mainly carburetor and intake manifold differences )
Very possibly just a design #
The best I can infer from Spielberger's Panther book is the numbers represent the tonnage ranges of the engine ??
The P 30 for panther & P 45 for Tigers .. ?
... he states the P 30 for the Panther produced 30 mteric HP per liter -- but 45 per liter = over 1000 HP ,, so ??
There seems to be very little difference in the two engines though , so I can't see how that tracks ...
( no where near enough for such a power output difference - mainly carburetor and intake manifold differences )
Very possibly just a design #