Hello.
Having a look through my stash today,I was comparing the kit side skirts of a Dragon Tiger 1 (late) with the PE set I have which I intend to use on the kit when I finally get round to building it.
What struck me is how thick the kit plastic part is. It is also moulded in one long strip whereas the real side skirts were four separate panels,often being misaligned or dented due to the natural wear and tear they were designed to endure.the plastic kit parts just look too pristine and perfect to accurately represent side skirts!
My question is this: does anyone know how thick the original 1:1 Tiger 1 (late) side skirts were? Would thin PE ones look too thin?
I've searched but so far found nothing indicating the thickness of the original side skirt.
Thanks in advance!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
Thickness of 1:1 Tiger 1 side skirts
Vierville
Gauteng, South Africa
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 17, 2016 - 03:30 AM UTC
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 17, 2016 - 04:31 AM UTC
They were, as far as I know, just sheet metal. Designed to stop mud and dust, not projectiles.
Given that, 5mm is likely to be too thick for them and as 5mm is roughly 5 thou in 1/35, they would have been pretty thin. The etch parts are likely to be closer to scale as moulding very thin plastic is difficult to do without a high failure rate.
Still, David Byrden is the subject matter expert on Tiger E so maybe he knows.
Given that, 5mm is likely to be too thick for them and as 5mm is roughly 5 thou in 1/35, they would have been pretty thin. The etch parts are likely to be closer to scale as moulding very thin plastic is difficult to do without a high failure rate.
Still, David Byrden is the subject matter expert on Tiger E so maybe he knows.
Cantstopbuyingkits
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 17, 2016 - 05:58 AM UTC
The references I've seen suggest the Tiger I's skirts were 5mm thick sheet metal.
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 17, 2016 - 06:13 AM UTC
Just a bit of related info: the skirts you see on the Tiger IIs and later, the Panthers and Hetzers -- were developed to counter Soviet AT Rifle bullets -- just like the schurzen and thoma plates of Mk III and Mk IV tanks and variants like the Sturmgeschutzen. The hull wall above the wheels was a weak spot that could be penetrated by AT rifle rounds. The skirt or shurzen plate would cause the bullet to tumble and shatter on the armor plate.
Byrden
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 17, 2016 - 01:13 PM UTC
The side skirts were about 4mm-5mm thick.
KurtLaughlin
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 17, 2016 - 09:08 PM UTC
Quoted Text
The side skirts were about 4mm-5mm thick.
I'm curious as to the "about" . . . Wouldn't they have been a standard sheet thickness and known with certainty, or were they a custom but as yet unknown thickness?
KL
Byrden
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 17, 2016 - 09:48 PM UTC
I haven't measured them exactly, that's all.
David
David
Vierville
Gauteng, South Africa
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 17, 2016 - 10:36 PM UTC
Thanks so much for the info everyone. Much appreciated!
On a side note,I've noticed that some side skirts are bolted straight onto the sides of the tank while others are bolted onto raised blocks corresponding to the positions of the bolts, was this due to zimmerit being applied on some tanks?
On a side note,I've noticed that some side skirts are bolted straight onto the sides of the tank while others are bolted onto raised blocks corresponding to the positions of the bolts, was this due to zimmerit being applied on some tanks?
Byrden
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 17, 2016 - 11:04 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I've noticed that some side skirts are bolted straight onto the sides of the tank
If you're talking about Tiger tanks, I don't think that ever happened. Please refer me to the photos that you saw.
David
B52Tailgunner
Texas, United States
Joined: October 30, 2017
KitMaker: 1 posts
Armorama: 1 posts
Joined: October 30, 2017
KitMaker: 1 posts
Armorama: 1 posts
Posted: Monday, October 30, 2017 - 11:07 AM UTC
Look at this site: http://tiger1.info/EN/Side-skirts.html
It should tell you what you need to know.
It should tell you what you need to know.