Hosted by Darren Baker
waffenfarbe question
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 10:33 PM UTC
Did the anti-tank (towed) units of an infantry division have red waffenfarbe of the artillery, or white for infantry.
Posted: Friday, July 22, 2016 - 12:49 AM UTC
Rose pink, sir.
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Friday, July 22, 2016 - 07:37 PM UTC
Are you kidding? Pink is for armor.
LikesTanks
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: May 07, 2013
KitMaker: 242 posts
Armorama: 234 posts
Joined: May 07, 2013
KitMaker: 242 posts
Armorama: 234 posts
Posted: Friday, July 22, 2016 - 08:47 PM UTC
Pink is indeed for armour, and also for anti-tank battalions of infantry divisions (and panzer/panzergrenadier divisions)
slug955
United Kingdom
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 195 posts
Armorama: 175 posts
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 195 posts
Armorama: 175 posts
Posted: Friday, July 22, 2016 - 08:51 PM UTC
It can get confusing but basically anything tank or anti tank was pink waffenfarbe. Artillery waffenfarbe was red so crews of Stugs (which started out as mobile artillery) also had red waffenfarbe. They continued with red waffenfarbe even when the Stugs became basically anti tank. Said it was confusing.
Posted: Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 02:20 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Are you kidding? Pink is for armor.
See? I wasn't kidding
Gaz
easyco69
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 02:36 AM UTC
Quoted Text
It can get confusing but basically anything tank or anti tank was pink waffenfarbe. Artillery waffenfarbe was red so crews of Stugs (which started out as mobile artillery) also had red waffenfarbe. They continued with red waffenfarbe even when the Stugs became basically anti tank. Said it was confusing.
but stug crews continued to wear the grey uniform...for artillery?
mpeplinski
Michigan, United States
Joined: January 17, 2006
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 182 posts
Joined: January 17, 2006
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 182 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 02:42 AM UTC
slug955
United Kingdom
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 195 posts
Armorama: 175 posts
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 195 posts
Armorama: 175 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 03:11 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextIt can get confusing but basically anything tank or anti tank was pink waffenfarbe. Artillery waffenfarbe was red so crews of Stugs (which started out as mobile artillery) also had red waffenfarbe. They continued with red waffenfarbe even when the Stugs became basically anti tank. Said it was confusing.
but stug crews continued to wear the grey uniform...for artillery?
Only tank and ss got to wear a little black number.....
LikesTanks
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: May 07, 2013
KitMaker: 242 posts
Armorama: 234 posts
Joined: May 07, 2013
KitMaker: 242 posts
Armorama: 234 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 03:51 AM UTC
Tanks and armoured cars....
Posted: Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 04:26 AM UTC
Except 12th SS who if memory serves me, got to wear captured stocks of Italian camo and leather submarine crew jackets.
DKdent
Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
Joined: November 27, 2005
KitMaker: 182 posts
Armorama: 180 posts
Joined: November 27, 2005
KitMaker: 182 posts
Armorama: 180 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 05:22 AM UTC
Greenmachine
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 25, 2015
KitMaker: 129 posts
Armorama: 122 posts
Joined: June 25, 2015
KitMaker: 129 posts
Armorama: 122 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 05:56 AM UTC
The various books on German uniforms confirm that pink is the waffenfarbe for both towed and self propelled antitank units. The early Sturmartellerie units wer used as gun support for infantry units, so their color is red.
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 06:55 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextAre you kidding? Pink is for armor.
See? I wasn't kidding
Gaz
Sorry Gazza. I thought you were just being funny by combining red + white. So it was just the same shade of pink as panzer pink? No distinction between the two?
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 07:06 PM UTC
So the personnel of any division could be wearing a multitude of Waffenfarben, depending on their particular branch, or specialty, irregardless that they may all be in an infantry (or whatever) div.? On a slightly different tangent, I've noticed pics (B/W) of anti-aircraft crews of 2 cm guns - Waffenfarbe is not distinguishable. Most wear Luftwaffe uniforms with Luftwaffe style eagle, but some crews are wearing Heer uniforms with appropriate eagle. All 2 cm guns are ground mounted for anti-aircraft use. So were Heer units also trained in Anti-aircraft warfare, or is this just a case of wearing whatever uniform was available at the time?
Hohenstaufen
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: December 13, 2004
KitMaker: 2,192 posts
Armorama: 1,615 posts
Joined: December 13, 2004
KitMaker: 2,192 posts
Armorama: 1,615 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 24, 2016 - 03:45 PM UTC
Quoted Text
So the personnel of any division could be wearing a multitude of Waffenfarben, depending on their particular branch, or specialty, irregardless that they may all be in an infantry (or whatever) div.? On a slightly different tangent, I've noticed pics (B/W) of anti-aircraft crews of 2 cm guns - Waffenfarbe is not distinguishable. Most wear Luftwaffe uniforms with Luftwaffe style eagle, but some crews are wearing Heer uniforms with appropriate eagle. All 2 cm guns are ground mounted for anti-aircraft use. So were Heer units also trained in Anti-aircraft warfare, or is this just a case of wearing whatever uniform was available at the time?
In a word yes. Don't think the type of division, think arm of service. However within the infantry regiment in heavy companies there were also Pak and the crews, being infantrymen would wear white.
Flak was originally operated by the Luftwaffe,so Luftwaffe Flak batteries were attached to Heer divisions. Luftwaffe Flak waffenfarbe was red as per artillery. Later Heer and SS formed their own units.
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 24, 2016 - 06:46 PM UTC
Quoted Text
However within the infantry regiment in heavy companies there were also Pak and the crews, being infantrymen would wear white.
Now this brings me back to my original question about towed Pak's in infantry divisions wearing pink or white Waffenfarbe. At first, the general consensus was pink, and now it's back to white. Is there a distinction between towed Pak's of an infantry regiment (white) of a division, and the Pak regiment (pink) of the same division? I'm modeling a Krupp "Boxer" of an infantry division towing a 3.7 cm Pak, circa summer '42. So would the crew wear pink or white Waffenfarbe? Did an infantry regiment use horse-drawn artillery, or vehicle-drawn? Did only motorized infantry use vehicle-drawn?
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 24, 2016 - 07:01 PM UTC
OK. I Googled (which is what I should have done), and an infantry reg. has 1 Pak Co. motorized (white Waffenfarbe?), and the same division has a PanzerJager battalion, motorized (pink Waffenfarbe?). Is this correct? Similar weapons and similar vehicles, but different battalions and different Waffenfarbe?
jrutman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 10, 2011
KitMaker: 7,941 posts
Armorama: 7,934 posts
Joined: April 10, 2011
KitMaker: 7,941 posts
Armorama: 7,934 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 24, 2016 - 07:03 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextHowever within the infantry regiment in heavy companies there were also Pak and the crews, being infantrymen would wear white.
Now this brings me back to my original question about towed Pak's in infantry divisions wearing pink or white Waffenfarbe. At first, the general consensus was pink, and now it's back to white. Is there a distinction between towed Pak's of an infantry regiment (white) of a division, and the Pak regiment (pink) of the same division? I'm modeling a Krupp "Boxer" of an infantry division towing a 3.7 cm Pak, circa summer '42. So would the crew wear pink or white Waffenfarbe? Did an infantry regiment use horse-drawn artillery, or vehicle-drawn? Did only motorized infantry use vehicle-drawn?
In the case you just stated the color would be white. The Infantry Regts had anti-tank platoons in all of the Bn's and also seperate Bn's of anti-tank troops and the towing was based on the type of Division,IE,horse drawn in Regular Divisions and wheeled in Panzer and Panzergrenadier Divs.
J
RonV
Alberta, Canada
Joined: February 13, 2003
KitMaker: 143 posts
Armorama: 120 posts
Joined: February 13, 2003
KitMaker: 143 posts
Armorama: 120 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 24, 2016 - 10:02 PM UTC
I have tended to consider that Waffenfarbe was a Battalion level identifier (but that is probably not always the case). If an soldier was in an Infantry Battalion, he wore white, regardless if he were a rifleman, signaller or medic. The PAK company was probably the same.This thinking doesn't always work so simply but it does make things a touch more understandable.
As for Flak support, until early 1941, all anti-aircraft protection was supplied by Luftwaffe units. The Army found this unsatisfactory and demanded their own units to be incorporated primarily in their motorized divisions. So Army uniforms worn by Flak crewmen is not an aberration.
One could spend an eternity studying this stuff and never find all of the answers.
HTH
Ron Volstad
As for Flak support, until early 1941, all anti-aircraft protection was supplied by Luftwaffe units. The Army found this unsatisfactory and demanded their own units to be incorporated primarily in their motorized divisions. So Army uniforms worn by Flak crewmen is not an aberration.
One could spend an eternity studying this stuff and never find all of the answers.
HTH
Ron Volstad
GeraldOwens
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Monday, July 25, 2016 - 01:07 AM UTC
Quoted Text
So the personnel of any division could be wearing a multitude of Waffenfarben, depending on their particular branch, or specialty, irregardless that they may all be in an infantry (or whatever) div.? On a slightly different tangent, I've noticed pics (B/W) of anti-aircraft crews of 2 cm guns - Waffenfarbe is not distinguishable. Most wear Luftwaffe uniforms with Luftwaffe style eagle, but some crews are wearing Heer uniforms with appropriate eagle. All 2 cm guns are ground mounted for anti-aircraft use. So were Heer units also trained in Anti-aircraft warfare, or is this just a case of wearing whatever uniform was available at the time?
Luftwaffe units were known as Flak battalions, and Heer antiaircraft units as Fla (no k) battalions.