_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Boxart for AFV Club's M113, I think
jasmils
Visit this Community
Queensland, Australia
Joined: December 23, 2003
KitMaker: 1,016 posts
Armorama: 745 posts
Posted: Friday, July 29, 2016 - 05:32 PM UTC

Quoted Text

One thing that is wrong in the box art is suspension - it shows the A2 version geometry (the upper run of track goes upward from 4th road wheel to the idler, over the fifth wheel). I hope the kit will have correct M113/M113A1 suspension (track should rest on the fifth wheel and go practically horizontally to the idler).

The A2 had increased ground clearance and idler was mounted higher, what introduced about 3 inch difference between the level of road wheel top and idler wheel top. In M113/M113A1 the tops of idler and road wheels were at almost the same level.

We need to see the plastic. Hopefully it is just the box art artist mistake.



Ok, so Pawel, please bear with me, and help me out here mate if you can. From the information I have (M113/A1 and A2 FOV), there are two types of idler spindle and two types of arm. Now both spindles are mounted in the exact same rosan inserts in the hull. However, with the A2 version, the plate that extends out from the rear of the hull for the other four bolts differs on the A2 version. The arm for the idler (A2) seems to be 180 degrees in the other direction as compared with the M113/A1? Hence the higher idler on A2's etc. Can you confirm this?
Cheers Jason
Vodnik
Visit this Community
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Friday, July 29, 2016 - 05:46 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Now both spindles are mounted in the exact same rosan inserts in the hull. However, with the A2 version, the plate that extends out from the rear of the hull for the other four bolts differs on the A2 version. The arm for the idler (A2) seems to be 180 degrees in the other direction as compared with the M113/A1? Hence the higher idler on A2's etc. Can you confirm this?


Jason,

The inserts in the hull are not the same. In A1 they are rectangular, while for the A2 they are cut in a curved shape on the rear. You can clearly see the difference when the main ramp is open - particularly on the right side, where the idler mounting is further to the rear, so the insert protrudes more (as the idlers are offset by 2.75", just like road wheels, with the right side idler being 2.75" further to the rear that the left idler. That's also why M113 use 64 track links on the right side and 63 links on the left side). The positions of bolts on A1 and A2 mountings are also different - they are not interchangeable. EDIT: I just checked in TM 9-2350-275-BD "BATTLEFIELD DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND REPAIR" manual and while the description isn't quite clear, it is possible that the A1 and A2 mountings themselves have bolts in the same positions and in emergency can be exchanged. But the rosan inserts are not the same and the position of the idler spindle on its mounting (relative to mounting holes) is not the same.

And no, there is no 180 degree difference. For some reason in most TM illustrations the idler arm for A1 is shown pointing upwards, but it is mounted exactly the same way as in A2.

So the 2" difference in idler position are a combined result of different position of the mounting on the hull and different shape of the mounting.
white4doc
#429
Visit this Community
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: October 14, 2003
KitMaker: 1,086 posts
Armorama: 964 posts
Posted: Friday, July 29, 2016 - 05:57 PM UTC
[quote][quote]
Quoted Text


And all I am saying is don't judge a book by its cover.

Cover art is to sell something, not a true representation of the contents.



Very, very true. All you have to do is look at the new Bronco Paratroops, to see that illustrated perfectly. The 113 remains one of my favorite vehicles, I hope this one is a good one!
jasmils
Visit this Community
Queensland, Australia
Joined: December 23, 2003
KitMaker: 1,016 posts
Armorama: 745 posts
Posted: Friday, July 29, 2016 - 06:01 PM UTC
Ahhhh ha ha ha, And here I was thinking it was just me. Cheers mate, that has cleared a lot up for me.
Never trust a drawing without a photo or 10 to back it up.
I was aware of the different mount protruding from the hull, But this quote from the TM, is why I asked about the spindle being bolted in same rosin inserts.


Quoted Text

The track idler arm assemblies used will need modified mounting provisions. When
changing the idler arm assembly the spindle must also be changed. The mounting bolt
holes will align with the rosan inserts in the hull if using the updated suspension system
or if using the old parts depending on the vehicle being repaired. The six mounting bolts
will hold the assembly without major problems.
The opposite side idler arm assembly can be used but only the bottom bolt holes
will align. For last resort use only should an idler be used with only two bolts holding
the spindle assembly.



Vodnik
Visit this Community
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Friday, July 29, 2016 - 06:16 PM UTC

Quoted Text


The track idler arm assemblies used will need modified mounting provisions. When
changing the idler arm assembly the spindle must also be changed. The mounting bolt
holes will align with the rosan inserts in the hull if using the updated suspension system
or if using the old parts depending on the vehicle being repaired. The six mounting bolts
will hold the assembly without major problems.
The opposite side idler arm assembly can be used but only the bottom bolt holes
will align. For last resort use only should an idler be used with only two bolts holding
the spindle assembly.



Yes, that's the fragment that is not entirely clear to me. I'm not entirely convinced that this (A1 Idler assembly - note that the lowest bolt hole is hidden by the cloths):



...can fit to holes in this (A2 rosan inserts):



It seems that upper holes in A1 spindle mounting are closer to each other than the rosan inserts in the A2 hull. But maybe it just looks like in in the photo.

I don't have such a clear photo of the A1 insert, but I know that bolt holes in it were lower, closer to the bottom edge of the hull.
jasmils
Visit this Community
Queensland, Australia
Joined: December 23, 2003
KitMaker: 1,016 posts
Armorama: 745 posts
Posted: Friday, July 29, 2016 - 06:38 PM UTC
Now those photo's make sense! Didn't even occur to me that the hull would be cut and a new plate added. Thanks mate. You have helped immensely! Time to check on how the M113AS4 is mounted.
Now back to the original topic, I don't see AFV Club or any of the other plastic boys doing this sort of thing. I hope so.
Vodnik
Visit this Community
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Friday, July 29, 2016 - 07:17 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Didn't even occur to me that the hull would be cut and a new plate added. Thanks mate.



I think that such additional plate was always welded in there - it was just fully rectangular in M113/M113A1 with rosan inserts in different places.

EDIT: I just found this photo:



So it looks like there was no additional plate in M113/M113A1 They added it to A2.

And this is how it looks on a hull that was from the start A2, not modified from earlier variant:

Vodnik
Visit this Community
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Friday, July 29, 2016 - 07:25 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Time to check on how the M113AS4 is mounted.



Nice pics here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoTmgk1w9Pw particularly at 1:55.
Hisham
Visit this Community
Al Qahirah, Egypt / لعربية
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Posted: Friday, July 29, 2016 - 07:50 PM UTC
Obviously, I'm not a rivet counter, and never will be one.. but It's always good, and actually fun, to learn some stuff about the vehicles we build models of

Hisham
2805662
Visit this Community
Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Joined: March 27, 2008
KitMaker: 546 posts
Armorama: 541 posts
Posted: Friday, July 29, 2016 - 10:26 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


The track idler arm assemblies used will need modified mounting provisions. When
changing the idler arm assembly the spindle must also be changed. The mounting bolt
holes will align with the rosan inserts in the hull if using the updated suspension system
or if using the old parts depending on the vehicle being repaired. The six mounting bolts
will hold the assembly without major problems.
The opposite side idler arm assembly can be used but only the bottom bolt holes
will align. For last resort use only should an idler be used with only two bolts holding
the spindle assembly.



Yes, that's the fragment that is not entirely clear to me. I'm not entirely convinced that this (A1 Idler assembly - note that the lowest bolt hole is hidden by the cloths):



...can fit to holes in this (A2 rosan inserts):



It seems that upper holes in A1 spindle mounting are closer to each other than the rosan inserts in the A2 hull. But maybe it just looks like in in the photo.

I don't have such a clear photo of the A1 insert, but I know that bolt holes in it were lower, closer to the bottom edge of the hull.



Interesting discussion - looking forward to the new kit, too.

So, any pics of a similar clarity of an A1 hull?

Thanks,

Greg
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 - 09:31 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Obviously, I'm not a rivet counter, and never will be one.. but It's always good, and actually fun, to learn some stuff about the vehicles we build models of

Hisham



Personally speaking, I'm sort of a "semi-rivet counter", if there can even be such a thing...

Well, I CERTAINLY HOPE that AFV CLUB gets their M113 ACAV RIGHT!!! If not, and that's a BIG "IF", then I'm reasonably sure that the A/M boys will set things aright... maybe...

OH, GEEZ, AFV, get it right!!! PLEASE!!!
 _GOTOTOP