Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
News
Amusing Hobby: Conqueror and Rheintochter release datesvaranusk
Managing Editor
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: July 04, 2013
KitMaker: 1,288 posts
Armorama: 942 posts
Joined: July 04, 2013
KitMaker: 1,288 posts
Armorama: 942 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - 11:26 AM UTC
Amusing Hobby has informed us that the two versions of the Conqueror will be available this month of September, and the Rheintochter will follow in October.
Read the Full News Story
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Wierdy
Ukraine / Україна
Joined: January 26, 2010
KitMaker: 570 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Joined: January 26, 2010
KitMaker: 570 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - 11:58 AM UTC
Finally! Now is there a company risky enough to produce an accurate M103?
TankManNick
California, United States
Joined: February 01, 2010
KitMaker: 551 posts
Armorama: 543 posts
Joined: February 01, 2010
KitMaker: 551 posts
Armorama: 543 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - 11:43 PM UTC
Encouraging signs - one piece slide-molded barrel (i.e. not split lengthways). Tracks look like they have nice detail (careful cutting from sprue!). Is that TWO versions of the bogies I spy? One fixed and one articulated with springs?
ULIX-VM
Puerto Rico
Joined: February 22, 2016
KitMaker: 834 posts
Armorama: 649 posts
Joined: February 22, 2016
KitMaker: 834 posts
Armorama: 649 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 01, 2016 - 02:23 AM UTC
after the exit of the centurion mbt from the british army inventory. the conqueror was the tank can replace it.
Posted: Thursday, September 01, 2016 - 03:20 AM UTC
Sorry mate,
The centurion stayed active for quite a few years after the conquer was withdrawn from service.
The centurion stayed active for quite a few years after the conquer was withdrawn from service.
alanmac
United Kingdom
Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 3,033 posts
Armorama: 2,953 posts
Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 3,033 posts
Armorama: 2,953 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 01, 2016 - 04:54 AM UTC
Quoted Text
after the exit of the centurion mbt from the british army inventory. the conqueror was the tank can replace it.
Yet another nonsense post from this person. Clearly they have some sort of problem, driven by the need to keep posting with statements of the obvious, inaccurate or just plain pointless.
sinistervampire319
California, United States
Joined: May 07, 2009
KitMaker: 189 posts
Armorama: 98 posts
Joined: May 07, 2009
KitMaker: 189 posts
Armorama: 98 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 01, 2016 - 08:28 AM UTC
I'm only here to read the ULIX-VM comments.
cheswickthecat
Washington, United States
Joined: October 13, 2007
KitMaker: 212 posts
Armorama: 208 posts
Joined: October 13, 2007
KitMaker: 212 posts
Armorama: 208 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 01, 2016 - 09:04 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I'm only here to read the ULIX-VM comments.
Haha I blocked that guy a long time ago but I have to admit sometimes I miss reading his nonsense. Maybe he's actually a bot?
Terry
Cantstopbuyingkits
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 01, 2016 - 01:35 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Sorry mate,
The centurion stayed active for quite a few years after the conquer was withdrawn from service.
The Conqueror was withdrawn from service after the MK5 Centurion got into production, as the British army considered the latter's 105mm to be well sufficient ever since the Soviets stopped their focus on conventional heavy tanks.
Wierdy
Ukraine / Україна
Joined: January 26, 2010
KitMaker: 570 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Joined: January 26, 2010
KitMaker: 570 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 01, 2016 - 02:49 PM UTC
TankManNick
California, United States
Joined: February 01, 2010
KitMaker: 551 posts
Armorama: 543 posts
Joined: February 01, 2010
KitMaker: 551 posts
Armorama: 543 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 01, 2016 - 10:51 PM UTC
If I may be permitted a few observations? (Yes I know I don't have the final kit in my hand!) No clear sprue is shown. Not too worried personally about vision blocks but there are 2 very large headlights on the front, so I hope that is catered for. I have not been able to identify the headlights on the sprues so far, although the guards are there in PE. I notice the decals allow you to 'build your own licence plate'. That's a nice flexible touch. Oh I don't see a dust cover for the mantlet, either on the sprues or the completed model. A pity if not included but not a deal breaker. I am encouraged by the turret on the sprue, at least to my untrained Mk 1 eyeball! Also, notice how the plate with the driver's hatch and the the one in front of that are separate? Could it be a Mk II may be coming in the future? I believe those would cover the external differences between Mk I and II - you may correct me if I'm wrong but I remain hopeful!
multibank17pdr
France
Joined: February 06, 2010
KitMaker: 127 posts
Armorama: 119 posts
Joined: February 06, 2010
KitMaker: 127 posts
Armorama: 119 posts
Posted: Friday, September 02, 2016 - 01:46 AM UTC
I blocked that guy a long time ago but I have to admit sometimes I miss reading his nonsense. Maybe he's actually a bot?
Terry[/quote]
Please tell us how you blocked that ? I wish I can do the same
Terry[/quote]
Please tell us how you blocked that ? I wish I can do the same
Cantstopbuyingkits
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Friday, September 02, 2016 - 02:15 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Please tell us how you blocked that ? I wish I can do the same
It literally gives you the option to hide a user at the top of their post, right next to the PM button.
acebatau
Colorado, United States
Joined: February 10, 2008
KitMaker: 730 posts
Armorama: 616 posts
Joined: February 10, 2008
KitMaker: 730 posts
Armorama: 616 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 03, 2016 - 08:56 AM UTC
beautiful
JSSVIII
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 03, 2016 - 05:18 PM UTC
I'm not sure what to think about the tracks, I really loved their pinned tracks in their Object 279 they went together beautifully, (although I was short by about 20 links, thanks to Pacific Coast Models for helping me with that). Are those ice cleats to the left of the track links, or are they some sort of "trap part" to hold the links together and still be workable?