Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
News
Customscale: E-50 Flak41varanusk
Managing Editor
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: July 04, 2013
KitMaker: 1,288 posts
Armorama: 942 posts
Joined: July 04, 2013
KitMaker: 1,288 posts
Armorama: 942 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 25, 2016 - 01:18 PM UTC
New paper panzer conversion from Customscale, a huge turret with a Flak41 for the E-50.
Read the Full News Story
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Taeuss
Manitoba, Canada
Joined: January 03, 2016
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 3,778 posts
Joined: January 03, 2016
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 3,778 posts
Posted: Monday, December 26, 2016 - 04:56 AM UTC
Yawn...another paper panzer, and while more interesting than the other absurdities seen sometimes, still meaningless. Oh well, if you must consider July 1945 then what the heck...
padawan_82
United Kingdom
Joined: December 10, 2008
KitMaker: 817 posts
Armorama: 555 posts
Joined: December 10, 2008
KitMaker: 817 posts
Armorama: 555 posts
Posted: Monday, December 26, 2016 - 11:29 AM UTC
I know it's a paper panzer so it never existed, but would it have been even possible for the tank to mount such a huge turret? (Centre of gravity issues and all that) and why mount the Flak 41 gun the recoil would be too much wouldn't it? Wouldn't have made more sense to have a smaller turret and put the gun from a Tiger 1 or Tiger 2.
Roshindow
Trento, Italy
Joined: May 10, 2014
KitMaker: 34 posts
Armorama: 32 posts
Joined: May 10, 2014
KitMaker: 34 posts
Armorama: 32 posts
Posted: Monday, December 26, 2016 - 02:39 PM UTC
The 8.8 flak 41 has just 1 caliber length longer barrel, and 30mm or so longer cartridge, the recoil was similar to the Tiger 2 gun probably.
Taeuss
Manitoba, Canada
Joined: January 03, 2016
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 3,778 posts
Joined: January 03, 2016
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 3,778 posts
Posted: Thursday, December 29, 2016 - 02:17 AM UTC
I agree, besides the turret, while large and ackward-looking, was probably only two or three centimeters thick with perhaps a thicker frontal area. Therefore concerns about center of gravity issues and being top-heavy probably were considered in the design phase. It was, after all, intended as a Flak unit and not a tank destroyer.