_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
News
Hobby Boss: Vickers Medium Tank Mk II*
tatbaqui
Staff MemberNews Writer
ARMORAMA
#040
Visit this Community
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: May 06, 2007
KitMaker: 2,713 posts
Armorama: 2,451 posts
Posted: Friday, January 06, 2017 - 06:11 AM UTC


Officially released last December, Hobby Boss shares photos of what’s inside its Vickers Mk II* kit.

Read the Full News Story

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!
Jmarles
Visit this Community
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: November 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,138 posts
Armorama: 953 posts
Posted: Friday, January 06, 2017 - 07:50 AM UTC
*yawn* where is my bergepanther?!
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Friday, January 06, 2017 - 08:29 AM UTC
I could build a whole shelf of these. So ugly and clunky. I love it.
basco
Visit this Community
Solothurn, Switzerland
Joined: September 24, 2006
KitMaker: 161 posts
Armorama: 121 posts
Posted: Friday, January 06, 2017 - 03:15 PM UTC
If I would use Facebook: I like!!!!
Frenchy
Visit this Community
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Friday, January 06, 2017 - 04:35 PM UTC
DAK dio idea



H.P.
IPLawyer
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: March 18, 2015
KitMaker: 71 posts
Armorama: 63 posts
Posted: Friday, January 06, 2017 - 05:49 PM UTC
Frenchy, thanks for that picture. I had never seen a picture of a Vickers Mk. I or II in North Africa before.
Frenchy
Visit this Community
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Friday, January 06, 2017 - 06:04 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Frenchy, thanks for that picture. I had never seen a picture of a Vickers Mk. I or II in North Africa before.



You're welcome Here's another one :



H.P.
Bulldog
Visit this Community
Ohio, United States
Joined: March 09, 2004
KitMaker: 41 posts
Armorama: 35 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 07, 2017 - 09:09 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Frenchy, thanks for that picture. I had never seen a picture of a Vickers Mk. I or II in North Africa before.



You're welcome Here's another one :



H.P.

Removed by original poster on 01/08/17 - 16:24:29 (GMT).
Frenchy
Visit this Community
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 07, 2017 - 09:26 PM UTC
Looks like they were only used there for training or as pillboxes...

http://tankarchives.blogspot.fr/2016/12/medium-tank-mkii-interbellum-long-liver.html

http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=134677

Another view :



According to the caption, this one has been captured by the Germans in Egypt in 1941 :



Pillbox :



H.P.
JSSVIII
Visit this Community
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 07, 2017 - 09:38 PM UTC
Great news, The tank in the photo is in the Hobby Boss catalog, but it is not this release, but should be the next one.
Taeuss
Visit this Community
Manitoba, Canada
Joined: January 03, 2016
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 3,778 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 07, 2017 - 11:04 PM UTC
Too cool! I love these dorky interwar AFVs, they're like the homely puppy in a litter, you're amused and impressed if it can do ANYTHING. The pillbox is a neat idea.
Jmarles
Visit this Community
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: November 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,138 posts
Armorama: 953 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 08, 2017 - 05:59 AM UTC
Quite a large tank considering the anaemic gun. So weird looking!
tatbaqui
Staff MemberNews Writer
ARMORAMA
#040
Visit this Community
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: May 06, 2007
KitMaker: 2,713 posts
Armorama: 2,451 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 08, 2017 - 07:25 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Looks like they were only used there for training or as pillboxes...

http://tankarchives.blogspot.fr/2016/12/medium-tank-mkii-interbellum-long-liver.html

http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=134677


Another view :



According to the caption, this one has been captured by the Germans in Egypt in 1941 :



Pillbox :



H.P.



A beute? That I like
Bulldog
Visit this Community
Ohio, United States
Joined: March 09, 2004
KitMaker: 41 posts
Armorama: 35 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 08, 2017 - 07:56 AM UTC
I recall hearing once these never saw combat. but seeing these photos make one wonder. Cheers, Brock
mprobinson
Visit this Community
Canada
Joined: January 09, 2011
KitMaker: 44 posts
Armorama: 43 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 15, 2017 - 04:32 PM UTC
These tanks were introduced in the mid 1920s. If measured versus other tanks circa 1925-27 it was well armed and armoured. By the late 1930s this was no longer the case of course. I believe these introduced the classic 3 man turret crew as well.
matlev
Visit this Community
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: June 02, 2013
KitMaker: 53 posts
Armorama: 53 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 15, 2017 - 10:05 PM UTC
The mk I was a pleasant build besides the single link tracks which follow the HobbyBoss agenda of doing the links too tight to fit eachother. Another flaw is the mudscrapets in the front who should be at an angle but in the instructions showen vertical. East to fix though. The tracks are best replaced by Bronco workable Mathilda II tracks. Cheap and easy to assemble.
tankmodeler
#417
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 01, 2004
KitMaker: 3,123 posts
Armorama: 2,539 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 15, 2017 - 10:26 PM UTC

Quoted Text

I recall hearing once these never saw combat. but seeing these photos make one wonder. Cheers, Brock



No they never saw combat. The ones on the Egyptian border (which is these ones) were bypassed ant abandoned.

That is not to say they were not used _operationally_ as right at the beginning of the war they were part of the active forces patrolling the border against the Italians, they just never saw combat and were withdrawn as soon as possible because they were totally clapped out as the war started an only used because there literally was nothing else on hand.

Paul
tankmodeler
#417
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 01, 2004
KitMaker: 3,123 posts
Armorama: 2,539 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 15, 2017 - 10:33 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Quite a large tank considering the anaemic gun. So weird looking!



The 3 pdr (47mm) could hole anything in German service in 1939 at reasonable ranges. Not quite as good as the even smaller 2 pdr (40mm) but quite respectable for 1938-39.

And one thing that made the vehicle quite large were the two MG positions at the rear sides of the hull. There had to be space to man them and store their ammo.

Paul
MikeyBugs95
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
Armorama: 1,712 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 15, 2017 - 11:09 PM UTC
How was the name pronounced? Mark-Two-"Star?" Mark-Two-"Asterisk?"
25PDRFG
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 09, 2009
KitMaker: 187 posts
Armorama: 181 posts
Posted: Monday, January 16, 2017 - 02:34 AM UTC
Mark 2 Star believe it or not it also went to the soviets and was know-as the English Workman.
RobinNilsson
Staff MemberTOS Moderator
KITMAKER NETWORK
Visit this Community
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Monday, January 16, 2017 - 03:04 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Mark 2 Star believe it or not it also went to the soviets and was know-as the English Workman.



English Workman was most similar to Mk IIA
/ Robin
KurtLaughlin
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Monday, January 16, 2017 - 05:13 AM UTC

Quoted Text

The mk I was a pleasant build besides the single link tracks which follow the HobbyBoss agenda of doing the links too tight to fit eachother. The tracks are best replaced by Bronco workable Mathilda II tracks. Cheap and easy to assemble.



Those may be the "best" alternative at this point but the tracks were not the same; they are approximations.

KL
KurtLaughlin
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Monday, January 16, 2017 - 05:25 AM UTC
The wartime photos above do not show the version modeled by this kit. This kit is a Mk. II*, the photos look like Mk. IIA*s which have a different turret and a radio bustle. I think Hobby Boss has announced either a Mk IIA* or a Mk II**, anyways a version with the radio bustle.

KL
matlev
Visit this Community
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: June 02, 2013
KitMaker: 53 posts
Armorama: 53 posts
Posted: Monday, January 16, 2017 - 04:45 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

The mk I was a pleasant build besides the single link tracks which follow the HobbyBoss agenda of doing the links too tight to fit eachother. The tracks are best replaced by Bronco workable Mathilda II tracks. Cheap and easy to assemble.



Those may be the "best" alternative at this point but the tracks were not the same; they are approximations.

KL



Sir
Thanks for the input. Before choosing the Bronco version I compared the Bronco links with the Hobby Boss links and they matched well in size with the HB being slightly thicker. Considering HB records of tracks that was not an issue. I also searched the internet for info with little luck. I know, according to the sources found, that A12 Matilda II was based on the Vickers Medium and the Matilda suspension was directly transfered from the late japanese export version of the Vickers Medium. Finally I tried to study and compare both period photos of the vehicles and the ones I personally have shot at the Bovington Vickers Medium and found no significant differences.
Based on the above I came to conclusion that the tracks were the same but if that is wrong I am more than happy that someone has the detailed information I was searching for.
Could you please Sir point out the differences between the track versions?

Regards
Mats
 _GOTOTOP