Armor/AFV: What If?
For those who like to build hypothetical or alternate history versions of armor/AFVs.
For those who like to build hypothetical or alternate history versions of armor/AFVs.
Hosted by Darren Baker
German armor in Korean War

PzDave

Joined: November 28, 2012
KitMaker: 319 posts
Armorama: 285 posts

Posted: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 - 11:59 PM UTC
And what if Napoleon had a B-52 bomber at the Battle of Waterloo.

Chuck4

Joined: November 13, 2013
KitMaker: 403 posts
Armorama: 401 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 26, 2017 - 01:00 AM UTC
Quoted Text
And what if Napoleon had a B-52 bomber at the Battle of Waterloo.
He wouldn't have the jet fuel to power it. 😖

hugohuertas

Joined: January 26, 2007
KitMaker: 1,024 posts
Armorama: 1,013 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 26, 2017 - 02:42 AM UTC
Quoted Text
And what if Napoleon had a B-52 bomber at the Battle of Waterloo.
Unlikely, and not the best attempt of a joke

At those years the only flying objects in France were the baloons of the Montgolfier brothers, Andre Garmerin, and a few others...
A feasible What If scenario might be starting with the French reinforcements reaching the battlefield in time, and changing the result of the battle.
No need for strategic bombers, laser weapons or multidimensional portals...


Bonaparte84

Joined: July 17, 2013
KitMaker: 338 posts
Armorama: 331 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 26, 2017 - 03:57 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextAnd what if Napoleon had a B-52 bomber at the Battle of Waterloo.
Unlikely, and not the best attempt of a joke![]()
At those years the only flying objects in France were the baloons of the Montgolfier brothers, Andre Garmerin, and a few others...
A feasible What If scenario might be starting with the French reinforcements reaching the battlefield in time, and changing the result of the battle.
No need for strategic bombers, laser weapons or multidimensional portals...![]()
back to Korea please


Bravo1102

Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 26, 2017 - 06:15 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextAnd what if Napoleon had a B-52 bomber at the Battle of Waterloo.
Unlikely, and not the best attempt of a joke![]()
![]()
It's not even an original joke. It's from a Saturday Night Live skit from 30 years ago. I always thought the other "What-if" skit was better. "What if Superman had landed in a country other than the US" That Nazi Uberman had me in stitches.
Back to Korea. I like the idea of the German armored cars. The ones with the 75s would have been useful.

m4sherman

Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 26, 2017 - 08:21 AM UTC
[quote]
A Puma type armored car would be reasonable given Germanys use of them through the war. I suspect any issues with them (if any) would be resolved by Korean war time, and the design could have lasted well past the 50's.
Quoted Text
Pumas, has anyone mentioned Pumas so far? They were a good design and could have lived on until the 50ies, couldn't they?
A Puma type armored car would be reasonable given Germanys use of them through the war. I suspect any issues with them (if any) would be resolved by Korean war time, and the design could have lasted well past the 50's.

mmeier

Joined: October 22, 2008
KitMaker: 1,280 posts
Armorama: 1,015 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 26, 2017 - 10:46 PM UTC
The germans liked wheeled scout vehicles even post WWII. The Luchs is basically "Puma on Steroids" and they even worked on a "Radpanzer 90" that used the Leopard 1A3/A4 turret (1 prototype build)
German Wiki
So variants of the 234 (maybe with closed roofed turrets - human waves and handgrenades are not funny with a cabrio) both with autocanon and more are quite possible. The 234 had good range and rifle-proof armor.
German Wiki
So variants of the 234 (maybe with closed roofed turrets - human waves and handgrenades are not funny with a cabrio) both with autocanon and more are quite possible. The 234 had good range and rifle-proof armor.

DG0542

Joined: March 04, 2015
KitMaker: 125 posts
Armorama: 125 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 26, 2017 - 11:48 PM UTC
Quoted Text
The germans liked wheeled scout vehicles even post WWII. The Luchs is basically "Puma on Steroids" and they even worked on a "Radpanzer 90" that used the Leopard 1A3/A4 turret (1 prototype build)
German Wiki
So variants of the 234 (maybe with closed roofed turrets - human waves and handgrenades are not funny with a cabrio) both with autocanon and more are quite possible. The 234 had good range and rifle-proof armor.
Maybe with the sheet metal or expanded metal screens, initial. Sheet metal roofs were used on M36B2 that the ROK got in real life, and the Heer used Expanded Metal Screens on some of their open topped turrets for their Armored Cars and I think I might have seen a paper Panzer Tank with the 2.0cm Open Turret with Expanded metal screens. Diesel wasn't the primary fuel in Korea, as most nations still used gas/petrol in their military vehicles.

BootsDMS

Joined: February 08, 2012
KitMaker: 978 posts
Armorama: 965 posts

Posted: Friday, January 27, 2017 - 01:02 AM UTC
Don't forget that any infantry figures, or indeed any others, could be depicted with the East German type helmet and the Leibermuster-type camouflage uniform, including helmet covers.
Personal weapons would be, as already identified in the original post, the Sturmgewehr 44; personal equipment mainly in canvas (which was happening I believe by the end of WW2 in any case).
'Could make for some interesting displays. All food for thought.
Personal weapons would be, as already identified in the original post, the Sturmgewehr 44; personal equipment mainly in canvas (which was happening I believe by the end of WW2 in any case).
'Could make for some interesting displays. All food for thought.
![]() |