Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
News
Amusing Hobby: Mörser BärPosted: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 - 07:04 PM UTC
Kept under wraps until the opening of the 2017 Nurember Toy Fair, Amusing Hobby has revealed another paper panzer -- the 30.5cm Morser Bar. Here we see initial built-up photos. More details soon!
Read the Full News Story
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 - 09:22 PM UTC
Another "What-if-and-never-was"!
ironelf
New York, United States
Joined: January 27, 2010
KitMaker: 235 posts
Armorama: 174 posts
Joined: January 27, 2010
KitMaker: 235 posts
Armorama: 174 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 - 09:41 PM UTC
Very cool looking vehicle. The tow cables look too thin though to tow that monster.
Taeuss
Manitoba, Canada
Joined: January 03, 2016
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 3,778 posts
Joined: January 03, 2016
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 3,778 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 - 03:08 AM UTC
Another silly attempt at entrancing us into buying something ridiculous. I'd prefer it greatly if the manufacturers spent as much time offering us better -and more reasonably priced- kits of vehicles that actually saw the light of day. Silly things we as a group can always kitbash. Wanna see my version of the helicopter/sub/spaceship that appeared in the Three Stooges Go To Mars? Same idea.
srmalloy
United States
Joined: April 15, 2012
KitMaker: 336 posts
Armorama: 298 posts
Joined: April 15, 2012
KitMaker: 336 posts
Armorama: 298 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 - 03:10 AM UTC
I wonder how long it will take Wargaming to implement it in World of Tanks as a premium arty... largely to everyone's disgust, given the current attitude toward artillery in the game.
flippen_waffles
California, United States
Joined: June 01, 2010
KitMaker: 143 posts
Armorama: 116 posts
Joined: June 01, 2010
KitMaker: 143 posts
Armorama: 116 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 - 09:21 AM UTC
Im excited to see this kit. I have been looking for one ever since New Connection models had their resin kit. Nice break from all the king tigers, panzer iv's, shermans, Panthers, Mausen (plural for Maus, lol), etc. that keep on being released, and re-released in some cases.
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 - 09:29 AM UTC
The set up on that vehicle is as ridiculous as putting a self propelled artillery piece in ambush scheme.
There's no room to handle the ammunition if it's closed top like that. And even less than no room for any ammunition. The concept is cool, but I would like to see panzer waffe '46 tanks that are practical !!!
There's no room to handle the ammunition if it's closed top like that. And even less than no room for any ammunition. The concept is cool, but I would like to see panzer waffe '46 tanks that are practical !!!
Vicious
Queensland, Australia
Joined: September 04, 2015
KitMaker: 1,517 posts
Armorama: 1,109 posts
Joined: September 04, 2015
KitMaker: 1,517 posts
Armorama: 1,109 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 - 01:53 PM UTC
Not my cup of tea but why not look a nice kit...
TigerTiger
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: January 19, 2017
KitMaker: 50 posts
Armorama: 31 posts
Joined: January 19, 2017
KitMaker: 50 posts
Armorama: 31 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 - 02:53 PM UTC
Not that I'll be getting one but some have missed the point, this was not your normal artillery it was an early (1943) plan for the Sturmtiger and was based on a Tiger I with leaf spring suspension not torsion bar. However it never left the drawing board.
This explains the enclosed crew compartment, as I'm sure you'd not want to be in an open crew compartment in a close quarters urban environment.
This explains the enclosed crew compartment, as I'm sure you'd not want to be in an open crew compartment in a close quarters urban environment.
thedutchie
Ontario, Canada
Joined: February 01, 2005
KitMaker: 1,299 posts
Armorama: 919 posts
Joined: February 01, 2005
KitMaker: 1,299 posts
Armorama: 919 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 - 04:24 PM UTC
Interesting subject. I have enjoyed Amusing Hobbys kits so far.
jon_a_its
England - East Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: April 29, 2004
KitMaker: 1,336 posts
Armorama: 1,137 posts
Joined: April 29, 2004
KitMaker: 1,336 posts
Armorama: 1,137 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 - 05:05 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Panthers, Mausen (plural for Maus, lol)
Mäusen or Mäuse
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 - 07:05 PM UTC
The idea of an enclosed fighting compartment for SP Artillery was to give protection to the crew from enemy counter battery fire as the SPG scooted to the next location. If it were in an urban area, the entire unit would be in a VERY bad way if there were enemy infantry or vehicles nearby. That would be a total mis-use of this sort of weapon -- save for the occasional direct fire bunker busting role. It was a bombardment weapon -- not tasked with urban fighting where enemy infantry or AFVs could fire upon it
TigerTiger
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: January 19, 2017
KitMaker: 50 posts
Armorama: 31 posts
Joined: January 19, 2017
KitMaker: 50 posts
Armorama: 31 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 - 09:48 PM UTC
Roy, this weapon was to be used just like the Sturmpanzer IV and SturmTiger just check the max range of the gun - 3Km, it was to be assault artillery.
Taeuss
Manitoba, Canada
Joined: January 03, 2016
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 3,778 posts
Joined: January 03, 2016
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 3,778 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 04:01 AM UTC
As to room inside an enclosed fighting compartment: admittedly its a larger shell, but how is this different than an M109? The shell is -undoubtedly- two-part with separate propellant charges, etc. So that makes sense. And only that....the rest is simply silly.
Posted: Sunday, February 26, 2017 - 08:28 AM UTC
Built-up photos from Amusing Hobby:
guni-kid
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: July 21, 2007
KitMaker: 521 posts
Armorama: 514 posts
Joined: July 21, 2007
KitMaker: 521 posts
Armorama: 514 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 26, 2017 - 02:37 PM UTC
Quoted Text
As to room inside an enclosed fighting compartment: admittedly its a larger shell, but how is this different than an M109? The shell is -undoubtedly- two-part with separate propellant charges, etc. So that makes sense. And only that....the rest is simply silly.
That's what I thought, but then I remembered seeing an M-109 in action once: Aren't they operating with open hatches in the back? It gives much more space to work the ammo and is still quick for the Crew to get in the vehicle and change position... I don't see those kinds of hatches on the Bär... but then again, the Sturmtiger also saw the light of day and worked (for the better or worse) somehow (with I think 6-7 rounds total when fully loaded?)
To the built-up pics: the tracks look a bit "off", especially in the rear section. But otherwise it looks nice (as a model kit I mean, the subject is obviously subject to debate )