Hosted by Darren Baker
Please excuse my ignorance....
MEBM
Indiana, United States
Joined: July 19, 2003
KitMaker: 1,055 posts
Armorama: 530 posts
Joined: July 19, 2003
KitMaker: 1,055 posts
Armorama: 530 posts
Posted: Friday, March 12, 2004 - 01:52 PM UTC
I have heard the term "Softskins" thrown around a lot here. My question is: What is a softskin? I have complete ignorance in this area.......... Thanks for your time.
Posted: Friday, March 12, 2004 - 01:59 PM UTC
Ola Mebm
Softskins usually are things like trucks and other non armor plated vehicles. I`m sure Cliff (MrRoo) can tell you all about Softskins but Softskins are things like Trucks, Jeeps Etc.
Softskins usually are things like trucks and other non armor plated vehicles. I`m sure Cliff (MrRoo) can tell you all about Softskins but Softskins are things like Trucks, Jeeps Etc.
Paul
Kharkiv, Ukraine / Україна
Joined: August 21, 2003
KitMaker: 705 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: August 21, 2003
KitMaker: 705 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Friday, March 12, 2004 - 02:18 PM UTC
Softskins are also wheeled vehicles
gcdavidson
Ontario, Canada
Joined: August 05, 2003
KitMaker: 1,698 posts
Armorama: 1,563 posts
Joined: August 05, 2003
KitMaker: 1,698 posts
Armorama: 1,563 posts
Posted: Friday, March 12, 2004 - 04:06 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Softskins are also wheeled vehicles
Think the LAV-25 and BTR-80 guys may beg to differ.
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Friday, March 12, 2004 - 04:22 PM UTC
I think the WW2 German RSO fully tracked tractor is a softskin as well. Generally, a softskin is an unarmored vehicle, usually (but not always) wheeled. Obviously, just because a vehicle is wheeled, that doesn't necessarily make it a softskin.
blank
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: August 28, 2003
KitMaker: 190 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: August 28, 2003
KitMaker: 190 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Friday, March 12, 2004 - 07:55 PM UTC
Yup. Basically, if it doesn't have armor, it's a softskin - the vehicle's "skin" is "soft" enough to let bullets through.... #:-)
MrRoo
Queensland, Australia
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Posted: Friday, March 12, 2004 - 08:37 PM UTC
Quoted Text
sorry Paul but a lot of softskined vehicles are tracked or half tracks. Motorcycles are also classed as soft skin vehicles too. Softskins are also wheeled vehicles
greatbrit
United Kingdom
Joined: May 14, 2003
KitMaker: 2,127 posts
Armorama: 1,217 posts
Joined: May 14, 2003
KitMaker: 2,127 posts
Armorama: 1,217 posts
Posted: Friday, March 12, 2004 - 08:56 PM UTC
from my understanding, a softskin, is any vehicle, wheeled or tracked, thats basic construction does not include armour.
this includes,
motorbikes, jeeps, cars, lorries, halftracks, gun tractors etc etc
cheers
joe
this includes,
motorbikes, jeeps, cars, lorries, halftracks, gun tractors etc etc
cheers
joe
jackhammer
North Carolina, United States
Joined: November 12, 2002
KitMaker: 357 posts
Armorama: 310 posts
Joined: November 12, 2002
KitMaker: 357 posts
Armorama: 310 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 13, 2004 - 02:33 AM UTC
Also, softskin can also refer to the people who believe that non-tracked vehicles are NOT a sub-species of AFV. I don't mean (read: Ya I do!!!) to cause any upset, because the Militarys unfortunate leaning toward this misguided direction. As we all know (even the ones who are hiding from the truth), if it aint tracked, it's a truck (wink to Mr Roooooo). Now I am going to froloic in a field of vinyl tracks and discarded link and length. Weeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!
This post is the view of one of my multipule personalities and is not nessasarily held by all of them or the management herein.
This post is the view of one of my multipule personalities and is not nessasarily held by all of them or the management herein.
Paul
Kharkiv, Ukraine / Україна
Joined: August 21, 2003
KitMaker: 705 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: August 21, 2003
KitMaker: 705 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 13, 2004 - 03:04 AM UTC
Wow, guys I really didn't now there were a lot of tracked softskins
MEBM
Indiana, United States
Joined: July 19, 2003
KitMaker: 1,055 posts
Armorama: 530 posts
Joined: July 19, 2003
KitMaker: 1,055 posts
Armorama: 530 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 13, 2004 - 12:47 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Yup. Basically, if it doesn't have armor, it's a softskin - the vehicle's "skin" is "soft" enough to let bullets through....
Does that mean WWII Japanese Tanks,too? :-) No really, I know a couple of WWII veterans who were in the first big Japanese/American tank battles, and he told me that a 50 caliber (12.7 mm to those crazy people on the other side of the pond) machine gun could puncture some of their tanks. Crazy. #:-) Thanks for your time.
flitzer
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: November 13, 2003
KitMaker: 2,240 posts
Armorama: 808 posts
Joined: November 13, 2003
KitMaker: 2,240 posts
Armorama: 808 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 13, 2004 - 11:57 PM UTC
Hi all....
and things that have wheels AND armour i.e. armoured cars, are not softskins...???
Cheers
Peter
:-)
and things that have wheels AND armour i.e. armoured cars, are not softskins...???
Cheers
Peter
:-)
MrRoo
Queensland, Australia
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 14, 2004 - 01:19 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Hi all....
and things that have wheels AND armour i.e. armoured cars, are not softskins...???
Cheers
Peter
:-)
No they are not softskins but AFV's
Cuhail
Illinois, United States
Joined: February 10, 2004
KitMaker: 2,058 posts
Armorama: 791 posts
Joined: February 10, 2004
KitMaker: 2,058 posts
Armorama: 791 posts
Posted: Monday, April 05, 2004 - 05:43 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I like nutty armor fans...I like the TinMan...He he he he ha ha ho ho ho hee :-) Also, softskin can also refer to the people who believe that non-tracked vehicles are NOT a sub-species of AFV. I don't mean (read: Ya I do!!!) to cause any upset, because the Militarys unfortunate leaning toward this misguided direction. As we all know (even the ones who are hiding from the truth), if it aint tracked, it's a truck (wink to Mr Roooooo). Now I am going to froloic in a field of vinyl tracks and discarded link and length. Weeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!
This post is the view of one of my multipule personalities and is not nessasarily held by all of them or the management herein.
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Monday, April 05, 2004 - 09:04 PM UTC
It is really interesting where should we draw a line between softskins and AFVs.
Take Humvees:
- regular M998 are definitely softskins, as they have canvas doors and roof.
- typical M1025, M966, M1036 and similar are probably also softskins, as their metal shell can hardly be called an armor.
- what about M1045 and M1046? They are partially armored - are they already AFVs, or still softskins?
- fully armored Humvees, like M1114 should most likely be considered AFV's, but I think most people will still categorize them as softskins, simply because they are Humvees.
Similar questions arises about gun trucks - are they still softskins?...
Of course we need to think about definition of armor - each armor package is designed to stop only some caliber and type of projectiles. So the fact that the armor of M1045 Humvee does not stop RPG round, does not change the fact that it still is an armor - it was just meant to stop MG bullets, not RPG rounds. So probably the most precise (although not necessarily practical) definition of "softskin vehicle" should be, that it is a vehicle not containing any parts designed to protect vehicle interior against any kind of projectiles. Of course some parts can still protect the crew from bullets, like engine block or heavier components of vehicle frame and shell, but unless they were designed specifically to protect from bullets, they don't count as armor.
Cheers,
Pawel
Take Humvees:
- regular M998 are definitely softskins, as they have canvas doors and roof.
- typical M1025, M966, M1036 and similar are probably also softskins, as their metal shell can hardly be called an armor.
- what about M1045 and M1046? They are partially armored - are they already AFVs, or still softskins?
- fully armored Humvees, like M1114 should most likely be considered AFV's, but I think most people will still categorize them as softskins, simply because they are Humvees.
Similar questions arises about gun trucks - are they still softskins?...
Of course we need to think about definition of armor - each armor package is designed to stop only some caliber and type of projectiles. So the fact that the armor of M1045 Humvee does not stop RPG round, does not change the fact that it still is an armor - it was just meant to stop MG bullets, not RPG rounds. So probably the most precise (although not necessarily practical) definition of "softskin vehicle" should be, that it is a vehicle not containing any parts designed to protect vehicle interior against any kind of projectiles. Of course some parts can still protect the crew from bullets, like engine block or heavier components of vehicle frame and shell, but unless they were designed specifically to protect from bullets, they don't count as armor.
Cheers,
Pawel
geronimo
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: April 02, 2004
KitMaker: 136 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: April 02, 2004
KitMaker: 136 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, April 05, 2004 - 09:48 PM UTC
Hi guys !
What about the M113 APC ? During my army time (when I had to repair that piece of
%$&"$§), we were told that the aluminium-armor will be penetrated even by 7,65mm bullets, depending on the location. A soft skin ?
Btw, why couldn't you use our fantastic metric system for your AFVs ? Would have made my life easier ...
But generally I agree; soft-skin is every non-armored vehicel, tracked or wheeled (or "footed" ?)
frank
What about the M113 APC ? During my army time (when I had to repair that piece of
%$&"$§), we were told that the aluminium-armor will be penetrated even by 7,65mm bullets, depending on the location. A soft skin ?
Btw, why couldn't you use our fantastic metric system for your AFVs ? Would have made my life easier ...
But generally I agree; soft-skin is every non-armored vehicel, tracked or wheeled (or "footed" ?)
frank
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Monday, April 05, 2004 - 10:11 PM UTC
Quoted Text
What about the M113 APC ? During my army time (when I had to repair that piece of
%$&"$§), we were told that the aluminium-armor will be penetrated even by 7,65mm bullets, depending on the location. A soft skin ?
No, because the aluminum shell was designed to protect the vehicle interior from artilery shrapnel and small arms fire. If it was effective or not is other question, but the idea was to stop bullets. So it is definitely an AFV.
Cheers,
Pawel
Grumpyoldman
Consigliere
Florida, United States
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
Armorama: 7,297 posts
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
Armorama: 7,297 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 - 03:49 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Hi guys !
What about the M113 APC ?
I believe just the name.... Armoured Personal Carrier would put it in the Armour class.
Cuhail
Illinois, United States
Joined: February 10, 2004
KitMaker: 2,058 posts
Armorama: 791 posts
Joined: February 10, 2004
KitMaker: 2,058 posts
Armorama: 791 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 - 05:13 PM UTC
AHHH, straightforward sarcasm from a grumpy old man! :-)
geronimo
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: April 02, 2004
KitMaker: 136 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: April 02, 2004
KitMaker: 136 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 - 11:53 PM UTC
@Grumpy
APC - this is how you call it; in the German Army it's officially called MTW (=MannschaftsTransportWagen = personal carrier), without the A for armored, you get the point ? Its nickname was "lunch box". Maybe its armor was designed to be bulletproof, but in fact the side armor (driver compartiment) was penetrated by a salvo of 7,62mm MG-3 bullets. The MG-3 is the good old MG-42 with slightly smaller caliber and lower rate of fire. No joke, it worked. But ok, let's say it is an APC (and the Maus is a cruiser tank ...).
CU
Frank
APC - this is how you call it; in the German Army it's officially called MTW (=MannschaftsTransportWagen = personal carrier), without the A for armored, you get the point ? Its nickname was "lunch box". Maybe its armor was designed to be bulletproof, but in fact the side armor (driver compartiment) was penetrated by a salvo of 7,62mm MG-3 bullets. The MG-3 is the good old MG-42 with slightly smaller caliber and lower rate of fire. No joke, it worked. But ok, let's say it is an APC (and the Maus is a cruiser tank ...).
CU
Frank
MrRoo
Queensland, Australia
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 - 11:58 PM UTC
M113 and variants are classed as armor and not softskins
geronimo
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: April 02, 2004
KitMaker: 136 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: April 02, 2004
KitMaker: 136 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 - 01:01 AM UTC
I give up