Sachsen, Germany
Joined: April 13, 2014
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 279 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 14, 2018 - 07:54 AM UTC
Texas, United States
Joined: March 11, 2007
KitMaker: 977 posts
Armorama: 976 posts
Posted: Friday, October 19, 2018 - 01:21 AM UTC
Looks like you can't turn the wheels?
Gregovich "I paint all my Models in 4BO Green" Beckman
Holder of the Knight's Cross, Hero of the Soviet Union, Dragon Slayer and Slinger of Massive BS.

#490
Sofiya, Bulgaria
Joined: September 22, 2016
KitMaker: 1,432 posts
Armorama: 1,390 posts
Posted: Friday, October 19, 2018 - 05:12 AM UTC
First and last pair of wheels were steerable(and I see steering rods installed).
Whether these pairs can turn in the kit-I will know soon.
Will build a Luna M/Frog-7 for a friend of mine,
Sachsen, Germany
Joined: April 13, 2014
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 279 posts
Posted: Friday, October 19, 2018 - 07:21 AM UTC
Hello
As you've already realized, the wheels are not built to be mobile, they are in the straight ahead position. The steerability in the model is very difficult to realize and the construction cost is no use. Every model maker knows that the first and last axle was steerable on this vehicle. The model is a complicated kit and you should not complicate it as it already is. Here is a picture of the original vehicle, what the model will look like.


#465
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: September 12, 2014
KitMaker: 398 posts
Armorama: 394 posts
Posted: Friday, October 19, 2018 - 05:28 PM UTC
Hi Joachim,
Good progress so far on your Luna-M. I‘m currently building the same Trumpeter ZiL-135 chassis for a BM-27 Uragan (I have the Luna-M in the stash, too) as part of the Launchers campaign and it‘s been going together well - except for the steering rods and ties, whose fit wasn’t the greatest. I agree with you that it‘d be difficult to make this chassis steerable, and I also built mine with the front and rear wheels pointed straight ahead.
Anyway, I‘m looking forward to your continuing build.
Jerry

#490
Sofiya, Bulgaria
Joined: September 22, 2016
KitMaker: 1,432 posts
Armorama: 1,390 posts
Posted: Friday, October 19, 2018 - 06:56 PM UTC
I also took a look this morning to the 9K52 kit(Luna-M).
Will build it (with 2 friends) for another friend.
We discussed whether is it possible to make the rocket arm lifting, and combat possition supports deployable with the ultimate goal of engine bay being not glued, but removable to show off the 2 8-cylinder engines.
The guy, who will get the built kit, served on one of these Launchers and we want him to receive a nice present for his desk.
Sachsen, Germany
Joined: April 13, 2014
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 279 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 20, 2018 - 05:44 AM UTC
Sachsen, Germany
Joined: April 13, 2014
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 279 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 - 05:36 AM UTC
Sachsen, Germany
Joined: April 13, 2014
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 279 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 01, 2018 - 08:18 AM UTC
Now photos from the bottom of the model.



#521
Kentucky, United States
Joined: April 13, 2011
KitMaker: 9,465 posts
Armorama: 8,695 posts
Posted: Friday, November 02, 2018 - 03:51 AM UTC
No criticism is meant here, just making a comment - I have always found this automotive structure to be what appears to me to be a very strange machine. A bit of a departure from other Russian 8x8 vehicle designs.
Over rough terrain it seems either the first or the last axle would spend a lot of time totally off the ground.
Very good workmanship Joch!
Just one fool's opinion.

#465
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: September 12, 2014
KitMaker: 398 posts
Armorama: 394 posts
Posted: Friday, November 02, 2018 - 11:19 PM UTC
Joachim, that‘s a very clean, good-looking build and finish! Nice.
I agree with Michael, this seems like an anomaly in the very practically-oriented world of Soviet vehicle design. What puzzles me is the decision to have each engine power the axles on one side of the vehicle. If one engine conks out, would that mean the ZiL could drive around in circles Homer Simpson-style?
https://youtu.be/GWBLYRzuDsIOr like Curly, for that matter:
https://youtu.be/T2iZPRif2i4 Jerry
Sachsen, Germany
Joined: April 13, 2014
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 279 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 03, 2018 - 08:28 AM UTC
Yes, the thoughts are completely right. There were big problems on public roads with this vehicle. The problem was not the failure of an engine, but the switching of the two gears. It often happened that only one transmission was switched and the vehicle turned when releasing the clutch. Mostly defective or loose transmission parts were the cause. Russian technology is a story in itself. It must have proven to be, there were a lot of vehicles. Will introduce here other vehicles ZIL-135 as a model.

#521
Kentucky, United States
Joined: April 13, 2011
KitMaker: 9,465 posts
Armorama: 8,695 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 03, 2018 - 08:55 AM UTC
Difficult to comprehend why they would do that.
The US Stuarts had twin Cadillac V8 engines but they turned on a common transmission and if one conked out the tank was not stranded.
Often if just moving the vehicle around the motor pool it was common to only start one engine as the move would not require much power.
Sachsen, Germany
Joined: April 13, 2014
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 279 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 03, 2018 - 09:05 AM UTC

#465
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: September 12, 2014
KitMaker: 398 posts
Armorama: 394 posts
Posted: Monday, November 05, 2018 - 04:28 AM UTC
Joachim, that looks fantastic - nice work!
Jerry

#521
Kentucky, United States
Joined: April 13, 2011
KitMaker: 9,465 posts
Armorama: 8,695 posts
Posted: Monday, November 05, 2018 - 04:55 AM UTC
My comments referred to the unusual suspension arrangement with the center four tires closely grouped and with the exceedingly strange power arrangement of one engine driving only the wheels on one side of the vehicle, therefore requiring both engines to be running properly to drive the vehicle forward.
The aspect of gasoline versus diesel fuel never entered into my comments. Clearly gasoline is the better cold weather fuel.
Sachsen, Germany
Joined: April 13, 2014
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 279 posts
Posted: Monday, November 05, 2018 - 08:38 AM UTC
Yes, everything right write, the two motors must run correctly. But how is it when driving through curves? Since the correct running of the two engines also uses nothing. There is no differential between left and right. The wear on the drive parts will have been very large. But it worked, that was the main thing.

#521
Kentucky, United States
Joined: April 13, 2011
KitMaker: 9,465 posts
Armorama: 8,695 posts
Posted: Monday, November 05, 2018 - 11:12 AM UTC
Excellent point Joch! No need for differentials but still there must have been uneven strain on the two drivelines when moving through curves.
A challenging question!
Sachsen, Germany
Joined: April 13, 2014
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 279 posts
Posted: Friday, November 09, 2018 - 08:47 AM UTC
Hello model maker
First of all thank you for your answers. To the interesting question with the cornering of the ZIL-135, I can only imagine that a disc clutch in the two intermediate gears for the left and right side has been installed. It should balance the speed of the main gear when driving through bends. the principle of balancing over disc clutches was known in the Russian automotive industry. This saved a lot of space and material on gears. So much for that.
The construction with the rocket for the Luna-M did not go on, the paint has to be injected and the detailing has to be done. It was started with a new model ZIL-135, it is a training vehicle for the drivers of the launch pads. Here is a picture of the original and photos of the model in its current state.
Best regards truck MAN






#465
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: September 12, 2014
KitMaker: 398 posts
Armorama: 394 posts
Posted: Friday, November 09, 2018 - 09:50 PM UTC
Joachim, good to see that you‘ve already started on the companion build, and a very interesting one at that - I wasn‘t aware of a cargo/training version of the ZiL-135, so I‘m looking forward to your conversion.
Jerry
Sachsen, Germany
Joined: April 13, 2014
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 279 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 11, 2018 - 08:44 AM UTC
Sachsen, Germany
Joined: April 13, 2014
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 279 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 - 08:19 AM UTC
Here is the still-announced photo of the original

Sachsen, Germany
Joined: April 13, 2014
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 279 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 18, 2018 - 08:13 AM UTC
Sachsen, Germany
Joined: April 13, 2014
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 279 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 - 09:05 AM UTC

#521
Kentucky, United States
Joined: April 13, 2011
KitMaker: 9,465 posts
Armorama: 8,695 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 - 10:46 AM UTC
Now you are pushing MY buttons! I am much more likely to get into weird and unusual cargo trucks than rocket launchers.
Great work! Way Cool!
(Though I do like that reload crane on the launcher! - Hey, build a structural arch up and over the transmissions then mount the crane between them to service loading and unloading of the cargo box! Cut the sheet metal engine covers as necessary to accommodate the crane tower?????)
Just thinking out loud. I bet there is at least a design drawing somewhere at the ZIL factory proposing that!