data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c882/3c882b32c7afc0e322e3d3f865d3e1e122b9cd01" alt=""
Over on "The MODELLING NEWS" site- New information has been posted by MENG, regarding their new M4A3 76mm (Wet) kit- Worth a look!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b063e/b063eb65de86eda1db874fed1b9a2e9435e19358" alt=""
I hope people convince Meng to make a wet M4A1 by buying this.
I hope people convince Meng to make a wet M4A1 by buying this.
Only Italeri, Dragon and Asuka/Tasca make this type of Sherman.
But the Dragon is getting hard to find, the Italeri is from the 1980s and the Asuka requires a second mortgage.
There are more Kursk Panther D than this, tons of Tigers, whole prides of Panthers and Pzkpfw IV G/H. (Five -six different kits)
And Asuka's kit makes no money for Meng. So why the heck not?
Only two companies make loads of Shermans. Everybody and their brother makes a Tiger. (Academy, Tamiya, Trumpeter, Dragon, RFM, Zvezda, Italeri)
How many companies make a Sherman; Tamiya, Academy, Asuka, Dragon, Italeri. But only one variant or another as opposed to everyone out doing themselves with ever more variants.
When a model company doing Sherman's get as obscure as a single company as used by Gruppe Fehrman maybe there'll be enough Sherman's-- like Pakistan M4A1E6 1965? Or actually differentiate between the versions of Israeli M51?
Now if only I hadn't just gotten another kit of this specific variant--
With 50,000 Sherman's produced versus 3000 Tigers? If there were seven times as many Sherman kits as there are Tiger kits then it still wouldn't be be too many.![]()
Maybe 16 times as many ---
Avoid Hobbyeasy, there customer communication is terrible.
![]() |