_GOTOBOTTOM
Dioramas
Do you love dioramas & vignettes? We sure do.
Modelling smoke and fire
rosenberg
Visit this Community
Denmark
Joined: April 12, 2004
KitMaker: 1 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 11, 2004 - 08:23 PM UTC
I'm making a 1/72 diorama and need a few hints how to modelling smoke and fire (flames). I have an idea for the smoke - painted cotten if that is possible. I have no ideas for the flames.
MATTTOMLIN
Visit this Community
Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Joined: June 01, 2003
KitMaker: 431 posts
Armorama: 388 posts
Posted: Sunday, April 11, 2004 - 11:11 PM UTC
roesnberge, thats good ( cottona for smoke) but you can aslo have painted cotton for fire, i have seen this been done beofore

good luck

Bus
Visit this Community
Sao Paulo, Brazil
Joined: December 11, 2003
KitMaker: 846 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, April 12, 2004 - 05:20 AM UTC
Look at this:



Hope it helps!
Bus
Visit this Community
Sao Paulo, Brazil
Joined: December 11, 2003
KitMaker: 846 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, April 12, 2004 - 05:30 AM UTC
Here´s how the modeller, SAm Garcia did it:
fire


The fire on the engine deck of the tank was sculpted from Milliput epoxy putty. It was rolled into thin, snake like strands that come to a sharp point at one end. These strands were then carefully added together a few at a time letting each group dry to have something solid to add subsequent strands to. The strands were sculpted on the direction I wanted the fire to burn. The "fire" was painted with Humbrol paints using red, orange and yellow applied with a brush.


smoke

The smoke for the fire was made from cotton balls. The cotton was shredded some then soaked in a solution of water, white glue and some flat black acrylic paint for color. After the cotton was thoroughly soaked in the solution, I squeezed out most of the excess liquid and let the cotton dry part way so it was just about at the point of getting stiff but still flexible. Then I molded this into position between the fire on the engine deck up into the tree. The smoke is made up of 4 to 6 different sized groups of cotton which were glued together with white glue. After all the cotton dried it was airbrushed in some areas, but not all, using black, dark gray and gray.
Hope it helps!
Major_Goose
Visit this Community
Kikladhes, Greece / Ελλάδα
Joined: September 30, 2003
KitMaker: 6,871 posts
Armorama: 2,071 posts
Posted: Monday, April 12, 2004 - 05:42 PM UTC
modelling smoke and fire is always a challenge. I hope u post some when you finish your tries, or even on the way !! Good luck
MATTTOMLIN
Visit this Community
Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Joined: June 01, 2003
KitMaker: 431 posts
Armorama: 388 posts
Posted: Monday, April 12, 2004 - 07:08 PM UTC
this method is good, but in my opinion the whole idea is not very satisifing, i still cant get past the reality thats its not real even though this is good as it gets,

just an opinion

matt
jonasaberg
Visit this Community
Vaasa, Finland
Joined: April 05, 2004
KitMaker: 66 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, April 12, 2004 - 09:10 PM UTC
I have to agree with the above poster. IMHO, the fire from that tank does not look as good as the tank. It is not anywhere near as realistic looking which is bad for the entire model.
I don´t think there has been a satisfactory way of making fire so far.

I suggest you study fire before you attempt modelling it. Take tons of pictures. Study colour, composition, everything you can think of. What makes fire look the way it does? How does it behave?
When you build a tank or something you study books and articles to find out what it looked like, where the machine operated, the crew etc etc. You should do the same for fire and any other feature you wish to add.
Paul_Owen
Visit this Community
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: May 11, 2002
KitMaker: 140 posts
Armorama: 108 posts
Posted: Monday, April 12, 2004 - 10:05 PM UTC
I've used the clear cellophane red-orange hard candy wrappers to make small camp fires in a diorama. It looks perfect. I suppose for bigger flames you'd have to fiddle around to get a realistic shape, but at least with this material the quality of fire is there.

Paul.
Golikell
Visit this Community
Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: October 25, 2002
KitMaker: 1,757 posts
Armorama: 914 posts
Posted: Monday, April 12, 2004 - 10:26 PM UTC
One should also keep in mind the material that is burning: magnesium burns white, copper green, etc!
slodder
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: February 22, 2002
KitMaker: 11,718 posts
Armorama: 7,138 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 - 12:10 AM UTC
I have to admit - I stay away from fire and smoke if at all possible. You are trying to make a Static representation of a thing that is in constant motion. To top it off you are trying to model vapors.
Pauls camp fire idea is a good one - for small fires. If you get very big that concept will break down and not give you good results. In 1/72 you might get away with it.
Also you need a light source, try to work in a small wheat bulb into the fire.

Sheps 2nd edition has a flint lock pistol going off in a dark room and the darkness adds to the affect. Basically it shadows the overall scene and lets your mind "fill in the blacks" of the fire.

Tough one to model. But you've seen the main ideas.
MATTTOMLIN
Visit this Community
Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Joined: June 01, 2003
KitMaker: 431 posts
Armorama: 388 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 - 12:45 AM UTC
i think that fire and smoke is simply an element of the earth that we cannot simulate to trick the authors eye, it is something that should stay away from modeling. i think we can only go as far as water, water is similar to the extent of fire, it has to be in motion all the time but unlike simulating fire and smoke i dont know what it is about it, it can still satisife us all for some reason i can not come up with.

matt
Stormbringer
Visit this Community
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: January 20, 2002
KitMaker: 1,667 posts
Armorama: 1,116 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 - 06:11 PM UTC
hi Guys
I have seen in the model railway world, fires simulated with the use of flickering led's, also you can actually use locomotive smoke generator units to give off smoke.My lhs has one in a burnt out house on a layout in the window.
The one they are using is made by a company called "Seuthe" and is for an O gauge loco.
HTH
Pete
GeneralFailure
Visit this Community
European Union
Joined: February 15, 2002
KitMaker: 2,289 posts
Armorama: 1,231 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 17, 2004 - 11:45 AM UTC
I've seen fine examples of smoke made from stretched cotton bud. The nicest results are flimsy plumes of smokes, rather than thick ones. Mixing grey and white paint on the smoke makes it look better.
The bottom of the very same bud can have a spark of orange, and you could place a flickering LED in it. I never tried it myself, but I've seen it in pictures and the result did not at all look as grotesque as some thick fires do in models.

 _GOTOTOP