Always good to see more choices out there.I did recently build Dragons excellent Tunisian Tiger,and I have their Tiger 131 in the stash,so I will have to refrain.
RobinNilsson
TOS Moderator KITMAKER NETWORK
Stockholm, Sweden Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
This one has a high bar to reach since David Byrden was the overseer on the Dragon version. I don't know what sort of accuracy this is going to have, or why we need another of a VERY limited style of Tiger I?
Bill Cross
Maki
Senior Editor ARMORAMA
Croatia Hrvatska Joined: February 13, 2002
KitMaker: 5,579 posts
Armorama: 2,988 posts
This one has a high bar to reach since David Byrden was the overseer on the Dragon version. I don't know what sort of accuracy this is going to have, or why we need another of a VERY limited style of Tiger I?
Rye Field tagged David Byrden in their Facebook announcement, so I expect he had something to do with this model as well.
Mario
alanmac
United Kingdom Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 3,033 posts
Armorama: 2,953 posts
This one has a high bar to reach since David Byrden was the overseer on the Dragon version. I don't know what sort of accuracy this is going to have, or why we need another of a VERY limited style of Tiger I?
You, me, we may not need it, for a specific selection of 'we'. Others may need it, different markets, Dragon might have become to expensive and have opened up a market opportunity for competitors who can undercut Dragons prices. A modeler looking for a Tunisian Tiger looks at Dragons kit for X USD and some competitors kit which only costs Y USD. If Y is less than X and reviews on the 'net says that competitor is almost as good or equally good as Dragon then the sale goes to the competitor. RFM seems to think that they need to, want to or must have one in their product catalog.
In memory of Al Superczynski:
"Build what YOU want, the way YOU want to....
and the critics will flame you every time"
alanmac
United Kingdom Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 3,033 posts
Armorama: 2,953 posts
This one has a high bar to reach since David Byrden was the overseer on the Dragon version. I don't know what sort of accuracy this is going to have, or why we need another of a VERY limited style of Tiger I?
Rye Field tagged David Byrden in their Facebook announcement, so I expect he had something to do with this model as well.
Is it me, or does the guy with the fez at right look like he's about to pee on the Tiger?
Well, under the "1/35" label in the bottom left corner, it does say 50 - 50. With that understanding, then what's the guy in the crouched position on the left doing??
IPMS number 506
AMPS number 711
Dioramartin
New South Wales, Australia Joined: May 04, 2016
KitMaker: 1,476 posts
Armorama: 1,463 posts
Robin alas now you may not be able to un-see what the guy on the commander’s cupola’s doing either, or the guy at the back carrying a can. All that aside what a superb piece of artwork, maybe even better than MiniArt’s Booth
Tim Martin
Scarred
Washington, United States Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 - 11:43 AM UTC
Quoted Text
RFM seems to think that they need to, want to or must have one in their product catalog.
Well, maybe. Based on what my friend, Raymond Chung, of Luckymodel has taught me about the Chinese plastics market and what drives these companies, it may just be a case of staying one jump ahead of bankruptcy.
Posted: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 - 06:25 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted Text
RFM seems to think that they need to, want to or must have one in their product catalog.
Well, maybe. Based on what my friend, Raymund Chung, of Luckymodel has taught me about the Chinese plastics market and what drives these companies, it may just be a case of staying one jump ahead of bankruptcy.
Does your post imply the possibility of seeing an upcoming bankruptcy of RFM? If so, I hope they will still release the whole bunch of Pz.IIIs first...
alanmac
United Kingdom Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 3,033 posts
Armorama: 2,953 posts
Does your post imply the possibility of seeing an upcoming bankruptcy of RFM? If so, I hope they will still release the whole bunch of Pz.IIIs first...
The post speaks for itself, please draw your own conclusions.
I've got the earlier Dragon/Cyber Hobby releases of the African Tiger so ho-hum...good for those who don't have these; indifferent for the rest of us who do. Market saturation and sheer exhaustion probably play within this reaction on the part of many others out there.
Headhunter506
New York, United States Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
I look at the RFM Tigers as a more affordable alternative to the excessively expensive Dragon kits. For the cost of two Dragon Tigers, I can pick up three and maybe, depending on the retailer, four RFMs. If you take a close look, the parts from both companies' kits are interchangeable which allows for some creativity in building various versions.
http://hitemlowandhard.blogspot.com
Headhunter506
New York, United States Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
The post speaks for itself, please draw your own conclusions.
Bill, is it so difficult to just say what you mean without the cryptic stuff? Simply writing what you meant is better than leaving it open to misinterpretation and adding grist to the rumor mill.
Does your post imply the possibility of seeing an upcoming bankruptcy of RFM? If so, I hope they will still release the whole bunch of Pz.IIIs first...
The post speaks for itself, please draw your own conclusions.
Okay, I will...
knewton
New Zealand Joined: June 19, 2013
KitMaker: 1,217 posts
Armorama: 1,092 posts
Does your post imply the possibility of seeing an upcoming bankruptcy of RFM? If so, I hope they will still release the whole bunch of Pz.IIIs first...
The post speaks for itself, please draw your own conclusions.
Okay, I will...
What I take from Bill’s post is that releasing Tigers keeps the doors open. Just without the subterfuge.