Yes I found a store that had one left over Isu-152 and the JS-1 kit from dragon.m I wish they would do a SU-76 right!!!

I agree Denizen. Soviet armor is my favorite and it is rare to see Soviet kits. Like Linz pointed out, there are some kits out there, but compared to German subjects, Soviet vehicles have been relatively unexplored by the major manufacturers. I would like to see Tamiya or DML do some of the early war soviet vehicles such as the BT-5, BT-7, or a T-26. I know that there are kits out there of those vehicles (and they are pretty good), but I would like to see the big guys use their model making expertise to make a beautiful BT or T-26 kit.

Just because Tamiya or Dragon do not make a kit (and not all of theirs are perfect by a lonng stretch of the imagination) does not mean that there isn't an excellent kit out there. And if there is already, why bother duplicating them? Yes, it happens often (M26, M4, M1, PzKpfw IV, V, VI), but why tempt fate? After all, isn't there some demand for a good T-55 or Centurion?

Alan do a SU-76, also marketed by DML. Apparently its rather nice, needs a little work and isn't a shake and bake like some Tamiya kits, but still, a very nice one.

Quoted Text

---

Alan do a SU-76, also marketed by DML. Apparently its rather nice, needs a little work and isn't a shake and bake like some Tamiya kits, but still, a very nice one.

---

Yow, Linz. Have you built this? If so, "needs a little work" is the biggest understatement I have read in a long time.

If you're more into building than modeling, avoid this kit. Nothing fits and most of the parts are WAY overscale (too thick and simplified). Now, if you want to model an SU-76, and have decent references as well as a good stock of styrene sheet, rod and strip, plus some scratchbuilding skills, you may want to attempt this build. The individual track links (once you figure out how to carve them from the sprue without breaking them) have guide horns that are too tight to fit the road wheels. You have to either widen the gap in the tracks (what I did by shaving and test fitting each link) or make the road wheels narrower (got a lathe?). The SU-76 was nicknamed "Suka" -- Russian for "Bitch." This kit is definitely a Suka to build.

As for the availablity of Russian/Soviet WWII armor kits, they are out there -- if you're willing to look and do a little modeling. Some of them may seem crude, but remember the real things were pretty crude. Most only need a little TLC and some aftermarket tracks.

Got that RIGHT Take a look at my pics folderhttp://community.webshots.com/user/reef12 To see what Hollowpoint says is true 5 months have gone into this thing and just about nearing the light at the end of the tunnel.

Don't get me wrong here. I've built the Italeri/Zvezda T-26, some of the old Mirage T-26s, the Italeri/Zvezda BT-5, a couple Eastern Express BT-7s, and even the horrible AER T-38. The reason that I want someone like Tamiya or DML to do one of those vehicles is that sometimes I like to take a break from the major TLC type of kits where you use more putty than plastic and you have to scratchbuild tons of stuff and do a nice easy build sort of kit like the newest offerings from Tamiya or DML where the kits practically fall together.

I've got to go with Linz, there are more Soviet TDs than US TDs. I have the Tamiya SU-122 and SU-85 (old kits) as well as a DML ISU-152. The ISU-152 is a rather nice kit. There are also several Russian made kits in 1/30 scale of various Soviet TDs.

Quoted Text

---

Got that RIGHT Take a look at my pics folderhttp://community.webshots.com/user/reef12 To see what Hollowpoint says is true 5 months have gone into this thing and just about nearing the light at the end of the tunnel.

---

Way to go, Jeff.

For those who do not realize what Jeff's photos show -- the dark gray plastic is from the kit. Everything else is added from scratch. Those also look like aftermarket tracks, right? You took this a little farther than I did. I kept more of the original kit hull -- but often wish I had replaced more of it.

Again, hats off to you, Jeff

The SU-122 wasn't a TD either, it was an assault gun mounting a 122mm short barreled howitzer. So now we have the Tamiya SU-85 and the DML SU-100.

Quoted Text

---

Alan do a SU-76, also marketed by DML. Apparently its rather nice, needs a little work and isn't a shake and bake like some Tamiya kits, but still, a very nice one.

---

Yow, Linz. Have you built this? If so, "needs a little work" is the biggest understatement I have read in a long time.

Quoted Text

---

Quoted Text

---

Alan do a SU-76, also marketed by DML. Apparently its rather nice, needs a little work and isn't a shake and bake like some Tamiya kits, but still, a very nice one.

---

Yow, Linz. Have you built this? If so, "needs a little work" is the biggest understatement I have read in a long time.

---

No, hence the use of apparently . I was just going off a couple of reviews that I'd found, plus what Cookie Sewell had written.

Cheers,
Linz

Don't count the ISU-152 as it was really considered a Heavy assult gun as was the ISU-122. Got to have that suka in front of it. So this leaves the 2 SUs the 122 and 85 plus I forgot about the Dragon SU-100 .Okay three compared to how many Amercian ones?

Okay I can go along with that thinking. Have you seen this site Adam.
http://www.battlefield.ru/specific.html

Nice models there Adam I liked that M-41 are those the new tracks from AFV club if not Great Job of painting !!

Quoted Text

---

Don't count the ISU-152 as it was really considered a Heavy assult gun as was the ISU-122. Got to have that suka in front of it. So this leaves the 2 SUs the 122 and 85 plus I forgot about the Dragon SU-100 .Okay three compared to how many Amercian ones?

---

Jeff, great job on that SU-76, you really put a lot of work into it. As far as US WW2 tank destroyers, before the AFV Club and Academy Hellcat and the AFV Club and Academy M-10 (and derivitives like Achilles), there were only four US tank destroyers in total kit form (not counting conversions like the 75mm half-track). Two of the three, the Tamiya M-10 and M-36 Jackson are more nostalgic pieces than accurate representations. The other two are the Testors/Italeri M36B1 Jackson on the M4A3 chassis and the old Anti-Tank Dodge. I will admit that now US TD fans have much to look forward to with a Jackson being done on the horizon (and the variant someone can kit-bash by mounting it on an M4 chassis). But this took a long time in coming. I remember snatching up the Tamiy M-36 reissue a few years ago and thinking about all the neat things I was going to do with it. Then the M-18 and M-10 hit the shelves and the Jackson is just another kit that may never be built.

I'm just glad that we now have access to all those Eastern European kits that give us the ability to model relatively obscure Russian and Polish armor. BTW, is the support roller set by Model Point a good deal for the Toga ASU-57?