Take a close look at the latest kit from dragon, the beautiful Pz.Kpfw.I Ausf A!
Dragon: Pz.Kpfw.I Ausf A (early production)
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
REVIEW
Pz.Kpfw.I Ausf.A (Early)Teacher
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 05, 2003
KitMaker: 4,924 posts
Armorama: 3,679 posts
Joined: April 05, 2003
KitMaker: 4,924 posts
Armorama: 3,679 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 - 10:30 PM UTC
shonen_red
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: February 20, 2003
KitMaker: 5,762 posts
Armorama: 2,283 posts
Joined: February 20, 2003
KitMaker: 5,762 posts
Armorama: 2,283 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 - 10:54 PM UTC
And finally! Magic tracks for the PZI! Awesome!
Grumpyoldman
Consigliere
Florida, United States
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
Armorama: 7,297 posts
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
Armorama: 7,297 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 - 12:33 AM UTC
It certainly looks good, and I also would like to see the track links sold separately.
barron
Virginia, United States
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 666 posts
Armorama: 598 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 666 posts
Armorama: 598 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 - 01:53 AM UTC
I like the detail that is molded into the kit. It's on my future list to build
mightymouse
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: June 25, 2006
KitMaker: 104 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: June 25, 2006
KitMaker: 104 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 - 01:54 AM UTC
Great review of a great "tank" model, Vinnie. I felt my credit card tinging in my wallet as I was reading the review.
I put the word tank within quotation marks as I still somewhat regard the Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. A as an "industrial tractor" (Landwirtschäftlicher Schlepper.) :-)
I put the word tank within quotation marks as I still somewhat regard the Pz.Kpfw. I Ausf. A as an "industrial tractor" (Landwirtschäftlicher Schlepper.) :-)
Posted: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 - 01:59 AM UTC
Good review and great photos again Vinnie!
Any chance dragon could organise some "time" in a box? Thats the part Im looking most for, now.
Im another who´d love to see the magic tracks released seperatly.
Cheers!
Any chance dragon could organise some "time" in a box? Thats the part Im looking most for, now.
Im another who´d love to see the magic tracks released seperatly.
Cheers!
Posted: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 - 02:07 AM UTC
Thank you very much for the review. I have always had a soft spot in my heart for the Panzer I for some reason.
HARV
HARV
wbill76
Texas, United States
Joined: May 02, 2006
KitMaker: 5,425 posts
Armorama: 4,659 posts
Joined: May 02, 2006
KitMaker: 5,425 posts
Armorama: 4,659 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 - 03:58 AM UTC
I'll add my hopeful voice to the links being sold separately, they are beautiful!
Thanks for the review Vinnie.
Thanks for the review Vinnie.
mightymouse
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: June 25, 2006
KitMaker: 104 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: June 25, 2006
KitMaker: 104 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 - 04:07 AM UTC
If Dragon were to sell their Magic Tracks seperately, they might stand a chance taking a good share of the AM track market from Modelkasten (unless people want moveable tracks, which I still think is kind of useless on a static model kit...)
Negrillo
England - North East, United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2006
KitMaker: 58 posts
Armorama: 54 posts
Joined: September 06, 2006
KitMaker: 58 posts
Armorama: 54 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 - 04:40 AM UTC
Looks like a nice kit Vinnie, however I`m a bit puzzled as to Dragon`s choice of boxtop and most of the markings, according to Tom Jentz`s Panzer 1 book ,most Panzer 1a`s were retro fitted with armoured cowlings over the engine air intakes and oil cooler, the majority were also fitted with a smoke candle rack, all this was done in the late thirties, Dragon`s kit is what it declares to be an early Panzer 1a ie pre-war which doesn`t tie into a 1941 5th Leichte Division vehicle which would have most of the above retro fittings ( plus Notek light ) the kit looks good but the markings are a bit out of place
cheyenne
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 05, 2005
KitMaker: 2,185 posts
Armorama: 1,813 posts
Joined: January 05, 2005
KitMaker: 2,185 posts
Armorama: 1,813 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 - 04:43 AM UTC
Very nice Vinnie, I love North African stuff.
Frank, if Dragon releases " time in a box " over by you before here in the states, can you send me about seven months worth,..... the check is in the mail.
Cheyenne
Frank, if Dragon releases " time in a box " over by you before here in the states, can you send me about seven months worth,..... the check is in the mail.
Cheyenne
dpwhite
California, United States
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 40 posts
Armorama: 29 posts
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 40 posts
Armorama: 29 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 - 03:05 PM UTC
I am finishing the assembly of this kit now. After the last Maquette kit I just finished, this Dragon kit has gone together virtually perfect and has been really, really fun. All of the hull parts fit great and the tracks are really nice.
My only criticism is the delicate hatch mechanisms on the hull and the turret. The arms come from inside the turret to hold up the exterior visor plates, they look good but because they are clear, it is really hard to see the mating detents that they are to fit into. I have had to solve this by filing the hinge pins down enough such that they fit in and then I have to glue them. I think this would have worked better if the parts were not cast in clear. Also the clear is much more brittle than the grey plastic.
I am taking the time to write this even though Vinnie's review was some time ago. With the new modified version that Dragon has just released it seems that they have the same set up, and I want folks to know that they are a serious challenge. I struggled quite a while with them and only because I wanted the visors to be open because I think the tank has a more detailed and cool look that way. If they are going to be closed, then dont even mess with them at all and just glue the exterior visors on the outside.
My only criticism is the delicate hatch mechanisms on the hull and the turret. The arms come from inside the turret to hold up the exterior visor plates, they look good but because they are clear, it is really hard to see the mating detents that they are to fit into. I have had to solve this by filing the hinge pins down enough such that they fit in and then I have to glue them. I think this would have worked better if the parts were not cast in clear. Also the clear is much more brittle than the grey plastic.
I am taking the time to write this even though Vinnie's review was some time ago. With the new modified version that Dragon has just released it seems that they have the same set up, and I want folks to know that they are a serious challenge. I struggled quite a while with them and only because I wanted the visors to be open because I think the tank has a more detailed and cool look that way. If they are going to be closed, then dont even mess with them at all and just glue the exterior visors on the outside.
jvazquez
New Jersey, United States
Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 857 posts
Armorama: 811 posts
Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 857 posts
Armorama: 811 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 - 01:18 AM UTC
Geez Pat, talk about pulling a thread out of mothballs! lol
kevinb120
Virginia, United States
Joined: May 09, 2006
KitMaker: 1,349 posts
Armorama: 1,267 posts
Joined: May 09, 2006
KitMaker: 1,349 posts
Armorama: 1,267 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 - 01:20 AM UTC
Wow Pat Make a thread in the constructive feedback thread with some pics of your build!
And I hate all the clear periscopes, particulary the PIV where they make ALL the parts in clear, kinda stupid actually. I'd rather just paint them and just put a little gloss clear where the lens is.
And I hate all the clear periscopes, particulary the PIV where they make ALL the parts in clear, kinda stupid actually. I'd rather just paint them and just put a little gloss clear where the lens is.
dpwhite
California, United States
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 40 posts
Armorama: 29 posts
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 40 posts
Armorama: 29 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 - 04:08 AM UTC
Will do Kevin, thanks for the suggestion.