Hi all
can anyone tell me the difference between the two kits Dragon has made of the Su100, kit numbers 6075 and 6096.
Cheers
Hosted by Jacques Duquette
Dragon Su100 kits
![](../../images/avatar/montgomery.jpg)
sxeandy
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/uk_1524.gif)
Joined: October 25, 2005
KitMaker: 55 posts
Armorama: 42 posts
![2nd Lieutenant](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.2nd_lt.gif)
Posted: Thursday, January 04, 2007 - 01:22 AM UTC
![](../../images/avatar/montgomery.jpg)
sxeandy
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/uk_1524.gif)
Joined: October 25, 2005
KitMaker: 55 posts
Armorama: 42 posts
![2nd Lieutenant](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.2nd_lt.gif)
Posted: Thursday, January 04, 2007 - 01:24 AM UTC
In fact now Ive checked properly on is a Su85! Its been a long day at work........
Anyway whats the quality of the Su100 likee? Any pitfalls?
Anyway whats the quality of the Su100 likee? Any pitfalls?
![](../../images/avatar/000.gif)
MiG-17
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/us.gif)
Joined: September 01, 2006
KitMaker: 123 posts
Armorama: 107 posts
![1st Lieutenant](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.lieutenant.gif)
Posted: Thursday, January 04, 2007 - 02:05 PM UTC
![](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/smilies/hello.gif)
Rob-
MiG-17
![](../../images/avatar/405.jpg)
Drader
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/uk_1413.gif)
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
![](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/blank.gif)
Posted: Thursday, January 04, 2007 - 02:10 PM UTC
Like Rob says, the Dragon SU-100 is very good. The SU-85 is really an SU-85M, which is an SU-100 fitted with an 85mm gun, there are differences to the basic SU-85 modelled by Tamiya. Have a look at Tankmaster's site for SU-100 photographs.
David
David
![](../../images/avatar/montgomery.jpg)
sxeandy
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/uk_1524.gif)
Joined: October 25, 2005
KitMaker: 55 posts
Armorama: 42 posts
![2nd Lieutenant](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.2nd_lt.gif)
Posted: Thursday, January 04, 2007 - 03:00 PM UTC
Thanks guys, Im gonna pep up the 100 and 85 with Armorscale mantlets and barrels, just as soon as Ive finished my T34 85, T34 76, IV/70 A......
![](../../images/avatar/rommel.gif)
shado67
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/us.gif)
Joined: October 16, 2003
KitMaker: 220 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
![Captain](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.captain.gif)
Posted: Thursday, January 04, 2007 - 09:31 PM UTC
Quoted Text
In fact now Ive checked properly on is a Su85! Its been a long day at work........
Anyway whats the quality of the Su100 likee? Any pitfalls?
I have recently completed the DML Su-100
https://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/90901#751105
The kit is very good...but:
With that said, it does have a a nice clear lens cover for the light, twine for the tow cable, good decals (although I had a BAD silvering problem), a very nice mantlet with great texture, nice finely detailed grab handles and nice hatch details.
Overall it is an easy build and good kit when finished. Considering there is not really much out there in a SU-100 (Zvesda/Italeri is the only other one I am aware of), it is a strong recommendation.
I would recommend you pick up the Eduard PE set for the kit and an aluminum barrel if budget allows. This well add some nice details for your build. As with all DML kits there are no crewmne or stowage items.
![]() |