_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Modern - USA
Modern Armor, AFVs, and Support vehicles.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Humvee upper hatch
USArmy2534
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,716 posts
Armorama: 1,864 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 21, 2007 - 01:09 AM UTC
I gotcha on the rear panel. It is part of a gunner's protection kit. The idea is that it supposedly protects the gunner from ground level gunfire. The first time I saw it was on M1114s before they began installing the more common all around gunner's shield. You can still see them on uparmoreds that have the shield though.

Lucas, your argument may very well be true but I'm not entirely convinced that Blast just simplified and got it wrong, as numerous model companies sometimes do for whatever reasons. It looks good enough and by adding that little square piece, it'd look the part just fine.

Jeff
USArmy2534
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,716 posts
Armorama: 1,864 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 21, 2007 - 01:46 AM UTC
the Gunner Protective shield is 36mm x 17mm. I used a sheet of somewhere between .25mm - .75mm styrene. I then added the hinges by a really thin sheet of styrene cut to size and a tiny piece of rod on top of that.

Jeff
DeskJockey
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: July 17, 2006
KitMaker: 1,558 posts
Armorama: 1,159 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 21, 2007 - 02:42 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I gotcha on the rear panel. It is part of a gunner's protection kit. The idea is that it supposedly protects the gunner from ground level gunfire. The first time I saw it was on M1114s before they began installing the more common all around gunner's shield. You can still see them on uparmoreds that have the shield though.

Lucas, your argument may very well be true but I'm not entirely convinced that Blast just simplified and got it wrong, as numerous model companies sometimes do for whatever reasons. It looks good enough and by adding that little square piece, it'd look the part just fine.

Jeff



Ahhh! Thanks for clearing that nagging question up. I'd been puzzling over that shield for months and the only (and very lame) idea I could come up with was that it was designed to hold equipment. Even that didn't really make sense to me.

I agree with you on what Blast may have done--as you note, manufacturers do it all the time.
USArmy2534
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,716 posts
Armorama: 1,864 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 21, 2007 - 04:26 AM UTC
According to Concord's Humvees in Iraq book, some Soldiers took to calling it the "Don't shoot me!" panel.

Just as often as not, since Soldiers find about 263 uses for anything given to them, you will see the shield used, like you said, as a storage hold (which can only help protect the gunner from having rounds overpenetrate the shield), to hold a tire, as well as to mount the "Stop!" signs that you see often.

Jeff
Urutu_
Visit this Community
Albania
Joined: April 21, 2006
KitMaker: 216 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 21, 2007 - 06:03 AM UTC
Thanks guys!

That was my choice too, Lucas - a senseless gear holder. But the protection issue is far more inteligent for that design (after all, to hold equip Iīd chosse some kind of grile or something

Thanks all!

Marcelo
Urutu_
Visit this Community
Albania
Joined: April 21, 2006
KitMaker: 216 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 21, 2007 - 08:11 AM UTC
Look this one.

Itīs a darker color M1114 Humvee. (note the gunner shild in the common desert paint).

This pic shows some interesting details of the armor too.



Bye,

Marcelo
Urutu_
Visit this Community
Albania
Joined: April 21, 2006
KitMaker: 216 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 21, 2007 - 08:19 AM UTC
Underside armor?



Bye,

Marcelo
USArmy2534
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,716 posts
Armorama: 1,864 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 21, 2007 - 08:50 AM UTC
Yep, you can easily see the underside armor. The technical manuals are available online and you can easily see the underside armor on the bottom left and right sides. The transmission and all the "plumbing" is left open for maintenance and because they are able to absorb blast and protect the crew. I think though that there is an additional plate between the plumbing and the floor of the humvee.

Jeff
Epi
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 21, 2007 - 09:20 PM UTC
No problem on the pics guys,. If I had a problem with you all using them, i wouldn't have posted them. Just as long as you didn't say you took them, no that i want the credit, just the right thing to do.

Here is a theory on the Blast armor kit. Before the manufacturers starting suppling that peice of the add on armor, the pattern had to have come from somewhere. I know I saw a picture in one of the Concord books that show that peice made out of rusty colored steel and/or painted in the tan colored. maybe thats why it doesn't have the correct bolts.
Urutu_
Visit this Community
Albania
Joined: April 21, 2006
KitMaker: 216 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 21, 2007 - 10:00 PM UTC
Still on the upper hatch and Iraq...

An interesting pic of an 1st Acav Humvee in Iraq. Probably in the early months.. The model of the hatch is the older tipe and thare are no protection at all.

Bye the way, intersting composed pic



Note the hillbilly armor.

Pic from here: http://www.pigbird.com/images_war.html

Bye,

Marcelo
USArmy2534
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,716 posts
Armorama: 1,864 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 21, 2007 - 11:29 PM UTC
Marcelo, that is an interesting picture. You can see that it is an M1025-series vehicle. That little bit of addon armor in the shot is great. Interesting to note not necessarily the rust but the sand mixing in with the rust to create a creamish "drybrushing" over the rust.

Jeff
DeskJockey
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: July 17, 2006
KitMaker: 1,558 posts
Armorama: 1,159 posts
Posted: Monday, January 22, 2007 - 04:35 AM UTC
Marcelo--regarding the first picture you posted of the damaged M1114, I don't think the color is different. I think that what you are seeing is the blast residue and/or paint scorching from the flames/heat of the detonation. That's why the windows look like they are painted the same color, and why the rear smoke popper and rear hatch are painted the standard sand color.

The CAV picture you posted, as Jeff noted, is quite interesting because of what it shows about the hillbilly armor. Look at the armor on the driver's door--it's a diamond-pattern tread plate. These guys used pretty much anything that could help protect them--steel plates, tread plates, mesh, etc. I also remember seeing pictures of Humvees with a lot of sandbags on the floor to absorb blast energy (needless to say, the suspension on those vehicles probably lasted less than a month).
Urutu_
Visit this Community
Albania
Joined: April 21, 2006
KitMaker: 216 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Monday, January 22, 2007 - 04:46 PM UTC
Hi Lucas!

You are right about the humvee color. I didnīt note the wind color Woow! What a blast!

About the CAV Humvee, it probably was took inthe early months of the operation, because nowadays itīs suicide to ride like that!!! Specialy in a terain like this one

Bye,

Marcelo
Urutu_
Visit this Community
Albania
Joined: April 21, 2006
KitMaker: 216 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 - 04:18 AM UTC
Helo Hummernatics!

Take a look at this intersting pic on Prime Portal!

Note the second door armor. Is bolted in the original armored door and some inches from it, maybe to deflect the RPG blast.



Nice building option by the way!!

Bye,

Marcelo
18Bravo
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 - 04:44 AM UTC
Field Mod

DeskJockey
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: July 17, 2006
KitMaker: 1,558 posts
Armorama: 1,159 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 - 05:37 AM UTC
Marcelo, the pic you posted shows an M1114 with an add-on armor package. These add-on packages are the ones I was talking about in my first post that are now coming on-line in Iraq. Basically, as we get more heavily armored vehicles, the enemy builds bigger bombs to defeat the armor, and we in turn add on more armor. I remember seeing another one of the armor packages in an earlier thread here that looked even heavier and more substantial.
Urutu_
Visit this Community
Albania
Joined: April 21, 2006
KitMaker: 216 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 - 07:24 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I remember seeing another one of the armor packages in an earlier thread here that looked even heavier and more substantial.



Yes! I saw that one too! Itīs impressive!

The weight of the door must be amazing!!!

18Bravo!

Nice pic!!! But too "cute" in my opinion... nowadays, useless.

But good reference and for the records.

Bye,

Marcelo
SgtWilhite
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: July 07, 2004
KitMaker: 470 posts
Armorama: 362 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 - 08:45 AM UTC
Just to add my two cents worth. Here are some pics I posted earlier in another thread of the trucks my son is using in Iraq at this time. [url=https://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/89838#742185[/url]
SgtWilhite
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: July 07, 2004
KitMaker: 470 posts
Armorama: 362 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 - 08:46 AM UTC
Let me try the link again. https://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/89838#742185
PacoBofarul
Visit this Community
Barcelona, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: July 31, 2006
KitMaker: 9 posts
Armorama: 7 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 - 02:45 PM UTC
When I made the Mig Productions conversion kit for the beautiful Tamiya M1025 Humvee I realize that there are basicaly 2 different humvees chassis. The one used for the 1025 (among others) and the M1113 ECV (Extended Capacity Vehicle) used in the M1114, M1116, M1151, M1152 and newest versions. The main difference (I mean visual) is the extended nose. The latest versions I have seen are (I think) M1114 and M1152. The first one wich increased armor (just amazing!)and the second one with appearance on a M1025 but with thw extended nose and A/C unit in the rear.
BTW, the weapons ring is different and unique for the M1114 version (and M1116, of course)
Regards
2CAVTrooper
Visit this Community
Alabama, United States
Joined: October 21, 2005
KitMaker: 310 posts
Armorama: 302 posts
Posted: Friday, January 26, 2007 - 03:31 AM UTC
DeskJockey,

The M1109 uparmoreds (square backs) has the side fold hatch like it's unarmored sibilings



DeskJockey
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: July 17, 2006
KitMaker: 1,558 posts
Armorama: 1,159 posts
Posted: Friday, January 26, 2007 - 07:16 AM UTC
Good to know, 2CAVTrooper. It seems every Humvee variant is different from the others!
 _GOTOTOP