Okay so I'm at my hobby shop today and todays arrival was the M51. I didn't buy it only because I wasn't sure what kind of opinion its getting. Looks like a nice build up. Dimensions and such pretty accurate?
Thanks
Jim
Hosted by Darren Baker
DML M51 Super Sherman (Premium Edition)

jvazquez

Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 857 posts
Armorama: 811 posts

Posted: Thursday, March 29, 2007 - 05:12 AM UTC

toadman1
Vendor

Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 1,141 posts
Armorama: 950 posts

Posted: Thursday, March 29, 2007 - 05:30 AM UTC
Here's Mike Land's review of it along with the discussion about it here on Armorama:
M51 review
Another thing about it is that out of the box, the kit cannot be built as a vehicle for the '67 or '73 wars due to the engine deck configuration being incorrect for those conflicts. The engine deck in the kit is set up in a post '73 war configuration. That maybe because the vast majority of M51's in museums and in private collections are in this same configuration and that's what DML used for reference. However, the decals called out for in the instructions are for a vehicle in 1967.
Chris "toadman" Hughes
Toadman's Tank Pictures
M51 review
Another thing about it is that out of the box, the kit cannot be built as a vehicle for the '67 or '73 wars due to the engine deck configuration being incorrect for those conflicts. The engine deck in the kit is set up in a post '73 war configuration. That maybe because the vast majority of M51's in museums and in private collections are in this same configuration and that's what DML used for reference. However, the decals called out for in the instructions are for a vehicle in 1967.
Chris "toadman" Hughes
Toadman's Tank Pictures

beemerfan

Joined: March 26, 2005
KitMaker: 8 posts
Armorama: 6 posts

Posted: Thursday, March 29, 2007 - 06:02 AM UTC
So true. Try this link for info on backdating the kit.
http://www.mheaust.com.au/IDF/Reviews/M51/M51DML.htm
http://www.mheaust.com.au/IDF/Reviews/M51/M51DML.htm

Kelley

Joined: November 21, 2002
KitMaker: 1,966 posts
Armorama: 1,635 posts

Posted: Thursday, March 29, 2007 - 08:04 AM UTC
James, check out this post as well for a correction to the review.
https://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/95899&page=1
Mike
https://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/95899&page=1
Mike

jvazquez

Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 857 posts
Armorama: 811 posts

Posted: Thursday, March 29, 2007 - 05:38 PM UTC
Thanks guys!

![]() |