Thanks guys, I appreciate the time you take to comment. It seems I have not quite finished this figure yet......
Quoted Text
Could you tell me how you painted the coat and helmet? It seems youve mixed some different colors. Did you drybrushed them after a base coat or something?
Dolf: They were Humbrol enamel 111, darkened slightly with black for the shadows, and lightened slightly for highlights. Drybrushed with increasingly lighter shades (lightened using white) and lighter drybrushing each time. A little "earth" added at the end, but not very much.
Quoted Text
The only nits I would have are the overall "sheen" the figures appears to have, and the gloves. I know all my gloves that have spent any amount of time outside don't look that clean, they're dirty. But these are picky nits.
Steve: The sheen is partly camera/flash effect, and partly a little over-handling of the body of the figure. The gloves.... mmmmm. I forgot the gloves
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b074/5b07441be94dd408624b499f0c33cccee964de0d" alt=""
Thanks for pointing it out.
Quoted Text
2 thoughts, did the MG 34 have wooden pistol grip and butt? And may be shading of the belts. I'm sure the figure guys can expand on this.
Definately a very good first large figure, but what no pictures of the underside
Mal: The MG 42 (that's what it says on the box) is marked in the instructions as to be painted matt black. I did that with a little grey drybrushing. I did drybrush the belts, but maybe not enough compared to the rest. You don't really want to see him from beneath do you? You might get a surprise #:-)
Quoted Text
I like the face your experiment with oils came out very good
Robert: Thanks mate, I was overall quite happy, thanks to all the help I got form you guys :-)
Quoted Text
I would say that the wood (on the entrenching tool) could be toned down a little.
Martin: Yep, your're right, again it was drybrushed a bit, but it was not washed, that will make a big difference and I will go back and do that. Thanks.
Quoted Text
as you paint larger figures (going from 1:35 to 1:16) are you supposed to do more or less exaggerating of the shadows and highlights?
gr8voyager: mmmmmm, I'm the wrong one to ask really. I have only done 3 1/35 figures and this one at 1/16, so I have not got much experience. However, I found in 1/16 I had to work harder at the shading/drybrushing, there is more scope for several different shades, especially within the large folds of the greatcoat.
Quoted Text
You´ve made a good job in the joints of the great coat. None of them are visible in photos anyway! It was my first large scale figure also. I found the face easier than in 1/35 but the coat and shadows took abit more work.
Plasticbattle: Thanks, I did have to fill and sand the joins in the coat, but they came out OK. I agree, the face was easier and the coat harder than in 1/35. Win some lose some :-)
Thanks again one and all for the encouragement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b010d/b010df51404d847888d8e403fcd25068fa4ae91f" alt=""
Roger